• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循环 T 细胞的功能生物标志物特征及其与麻风病患者不同临床状态及其各自家庭接触者的关联。

Functional biomarker signatures of circulating T-cells and its association with distinct clinical status of leprosy patients and their respective household contacts.

机构信息

Universidade Vale do Rio Doce - Univale, Governador Valadares, MG, Brazil.

Grupo Integrado de Pesquisas em Biomarcadores, Instituto René Rachou, FIOCRUZ-Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Dec 20;9(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00763-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40249-020-00763-7
PMID:33341111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7749990/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease classified into two subgroups for therapeutic purposes: paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB), closely related to the host immune responses. In this context it is noteworthy looking for immunological biomarkers applicable as complementary diagnostic tools as well as a laboratorial strategy to follow-up leprosy household contacts.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study enrolled 49 participants, including 19 patients and 30 healthy controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated and incubated in the presence of Mycobacterium leprae bacilli. The cells were prepared for surface (CD4 and CD8) and intracytoplasmic cytokine staining (IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10). Multiple comparisons amongst groups were carried out by ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Student T or Mann-Whitney test. Comparative analysis of categorical variables was performed by Chi-square. Functional biomarker signature analysis was conducted using the global median values for each biomarker index as the cut-off edge to identify the proportion of subjects with high biomarker levels.

RESULTS

The cytokine signature analysis demonstrated that leprosy patients presented a polyfunctional profile of T-cells subsets, with increased frequency of IFN-γ T-cell subsets along with IL-10 and IL-4 from CD4 T-cells, as compared to health Controls (Venn diagram report). Moreover, statistical analysis was carried out using parametric or non-parametric variance analysis followed by pairwise multiple comparisons, according to the data normality distribution. L(PB) displayed a polyfunctional profile characterized by enhanced percentage of IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4 produced by most T-cell subsets, as compared to L(MB) that presented a more restricted cytokine functional profile mediated by IL-10 and IL-4 T-cells with minor contribution of IFN-γ produced by CD4 T-cells. Noteworthy was that HHC(MB) exhibited enhanced frequency of IFN-γ T-cells, contrasting with HHC(PB) that presented a cytokine profile limited to IL-10 and IL-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated that L(PB) displayed enhanced percentage of IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-4 as compared to L(MB) that presented functional profile mediated by IL-10 and IL-4 T-cells and HHC(MB) exhibited enhanced frequency of IFN-γ T-cells, contrasting with HHC(PB). Together, our findings provide additional immunological features associated with leprosy and household contacts. These data provide evidence that biomarkers of immune response can be useful complementary diagnostic/prognostic tools as well as insights that household contacts should be monitored to access putative subclinical infection.

摘要

背景

麻风病是一种慢性传染病,根据宿主免疫反应,分为少菌型(PB)和多菌型(MB)两种亚型,与宿主免疫反应密切相关。在这种情况下,寻找可作为辅助诊断工具的免疫生物标志物以及麻风病家庭接触者的实验室监测策略是值得关注的。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了 49 名参与者,包括 19 名患者和 30 名健康对照者。分离外周血单核细胞(PBMC),并在麻风分枝杆菌存在的情况下孵育。对细胞进行表面(CD4 和 CD8)和细胞内细胞因子染色(IFN-γ、IL-4 和 IL-10)。采用方差分析、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验、学生 t 检验或曼-惠特尼检验对各组间进行多重比较。采用卡方检验比较分类变量。使用每个生物标志物指标的全局中位数作为截点值进行功能生物标志物特征分析,以确定高生物标志物水平的受试者比例。

结果

细胞因子特征分析表明,与健康对照组相比,麻风病患者的 T 细胞亚群呈现出多能性特征,CD4 T 细胞中 IFN-γ T 细胞亚群的频率增加,同时伴有 IL-10 和 IL-4。此外,根据数据正态分布,采用参数或非参数方差分析进行统计分析,然后进行两两多重比较。L(PB)表现出多能性特征,与 L(MB)相比,大多数 T 细胞亚群产生的 IFN-γ、IL-10 和 IL-4 百分比增加,而 L(MB)表现出由 IL-10 和 IL-4 T 细胞介导的更受限的细胞因子功能特征,仅由 CD4 T 细胞产生少量 IFN-γ。值得注意的是,HHC(MB)表现出 IFN-γ T 细胞频率增加,而 HHC(PB)则表现出仅局限于 IL-10 和 IL-4 的细胞因子特征。

结论

与 L(MB)相比,L(PB)表现出更高百分比的 IFN-γ、IL-10 和 IL-4,而 L(MB)表现出由 IL-10 和 IL-4 T 细胞介导的功能特征,HHC(MB)表现出更高频率的 IFN-γ T 细胞,而 HHC(PB)则相反。综上所述,我们的研究结果提供了与麻风病和家庭接触者相关的额外免疫特征。这些数据表明,免疫反应的生物标志物可以作为有用的辅助诊断/预后工具,并且家庭接触者应该受到监测,以评估潜在的亚临床感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/f913d729b284/40249_2020_763_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/d5a646294812/40249_2020_763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/9198374c1dc1/40249_2020_763_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/52b2140b46e7/40249_2020_763_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/f913d729b284/40249_2020_763_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/d5a646294812/40249_2020_763_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/9198374c1dc1/40249_2020_763_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/52b2140b46e7/40249_2020_763_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a7/7749990/f913d729b284/40249_2020_763_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional biomarker signatures of circulating T-cells and its association with distinct clinical status of leprosy patients and their respective household contacts.循环 T 细胞的功能生物标志物特征及其与麻风病患者不同临床状态及其各自家庭接触者的关联。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Dec 20;9(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00763-7.
2
CCL2 and IFN-γ serum levels as biomarkers for subclinical infection in household contacts of leprosy patients.CCL2 和 IFN-γ 血清水平作为麻风病患者家庭接触者亚临床感染的生物标志物。
Microb Pathog. 2021 Jan;150:104725. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104725. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Distinct Roles of Th17 and Th1 Cells in Inflammatory Responses Associated with the Presentation of Paucibacillary Leprosy and Leprosy Reactions.辅助性T细胞17(Th17)和辅助性T细胞1(Th1)在与少菌型麻风及麻风反应相关的炎症反应中的不同作用
Scand J Immunol. 2017 Jul;86(1):40-49. doi: 10.1111/sji.12558.
4
Interplay among differential exposure to and TLR4 polymorphism impacts the immune response in household contacts of leprosy patients.不同的接触 和 TLR4 多态性之间的相互作用影响麻风病患者家庭接触者的免疫反应。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 28;14:1130137. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130137. eCollection 2023.
5
Differential development of CD4 and CD8 cytotoxic T cells (CTL) in PBMC across the leprosy spectrum; IL-6 with IFN-gamma or IL-2 generate CTL in multibacillary patients.麻风病谱中PBMC内CD4和CD8细胞毒性T细胞(CTL)的差异发育;白细胞介素-6与干扰素-γ或白细胞介素-2在多菌型患者中产生CTL。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Mar;65(1):45-55.
6
Immunological cytokine correlates of protective immunity and pathogenesis in leprosy.麻风病中保护性免疫和发病机制的免疫细胞因子关联
Scand J Immunol. 2000 Apr;51(4):419-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2000.00703.x.
7
Recombinant Antigen Induces High Expression of Multifunction T Lymphocytes and Is Promising as a Specific Vaccine for Leprosy.重组抗原诱导多功能 T 淋巴细胞高表达,有望成为麻风病特异性疫苗。
Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 12;9:2920. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02920. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluation of various cytokines elicited during antigen-specific recall as potential risk indicators for the differential development of leprosy.评价抗原特异性回忆过程中引发的各种细胞因子,作为麻风病不同发展的潜在风险指标。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1443-51. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1462-0. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
9
Evaluation of antigen-specific immune responses for leprosy diagnosis in a hyperendemic area in China.中国高流行地区麻风病诊断的抗原特异性免疫反应评估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Sep 24;12(9):e0006777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006777. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Immunological biomarkers of subclinical infection in household contacts of leprosy patients.麻风病患者家庭接触者亚临床感染的免疫生物标志物。
Immunobiology. 2019 Jul;224(4):518-525. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The landscape of chemokine and cytokine is associated with the distinct clinical status of leprosy patients and their respective household contacts.趋化因子和细胞因子的情况与麻风病患者及其各自家庭接触者的不同临床状况相关。
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1476450. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1476450. eCollection 2024.
2
Cytokines profile in pure neural leprosy.单纯型麻风的细胞因子谱。
Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 5;14:1272471. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1272471. eCollection 2023.
3
Characterization of Rongchang piglets after infection with type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains differing in pathogenicity.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel integrated molecular and serological analysis method to predict new cases of leprosy amongst household contacts.一种新型的综合分子与血清学分析方法,用于预测家庭接触者中新发麻风病例。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jun 10;13(6):e0007400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007400. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Immunological biomarkers of subclinical infection in household contacts of leprosy patients.麻风病患者家庭接触者亚临床感染的免疫生物标志物。
Immunobiology. 2019 Jul;224(4):518-525. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 8.
3
Evaluation of monocyte subsets and markers of activation in leprosy reactions.
致病性不同的2型猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒株感染后荣昌仔猪的特征分析
Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1283039. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1283039. eCollection 2023.
4
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid-Derived Lipid Mediators as Potential Biomarkers for Leprosy Among Individuals with Asymptomatic Infection.多不饱和脂肪酸衍生的脂质介质作为无症状感染个体中麻风病的潜在生物标志物。
ACS Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 11;9(8):1458-1469. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00585. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Interplay among differential exposure to and TLR4 polymorphism impacts the immune response in household contacts of leprosy patients.不同的接触 和 TLR4 多态性之间的相互作用影响麻风病患者家庭接触者的免疫反应。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 28;14:1130137. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130137. eCollection 2023.
6
Adaptive Immune Response to Complex (MABSC) in Cystic Fibrosis and the Implications of Cross-Reactivity.对囊性纤维化中复杂(MABSC)的适应性免疫反应及交叉反应的意义。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Apr 20;12:858398. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.858398. eCollection 2022.
7
Algorithm Design for a Cytokine Release Assay of Antigen-Specific In Vitro Stimuli of Circulating Leukocytes to Classify Leprosy Patients and Household Contacts.用于循环白细胞抗原特异性体外刺激的细胞因子释放测定以对麻风病患者和家庭接触者进行分类的算法设计
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 30;9(3):ofac036. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac036. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Identification of sensitive indicators in immune response for leprosy affected patients: An observational clinical study of safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccine.免疫反应中麻风病患者敏感指标的鉴定:流感疫苗安全性和免疫原性的观察性临床研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Aug 6;100(31):e26744. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026744.
评价麻风反应中单核细胞亚群及其激活标志物。
Microbes Infect. 2019 Mar;21(2):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Detection of in patients with leprosy in India.印度麻风病患者中[此处缺失具体检测内容]的检测。
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Oct 10;11:1677-1683. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S166035. eCollection 2018.
5
Minimum requirements and optimal testing strategies of a diagnostic test for leprosy as a tool towards zero transmission: A modeling study.麻风病诊断检测的最低要求和最佳检测策略:一种实现零传播的工具:建模研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 May 25;12(5):e0006529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006529. eCollection 2018 May.
6
World leprosy day 2018: How forward respecting the past?2018年世界麻风病日:如何在尊重过去的基础上向前迈进?
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Jan;147(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_109_18.
7
High frequency of M. leprae DNA detection in asymptomatic household contacts.在无症状的家庭接触者中频繁检测到麻风分枝杆菌 DNA。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3056-2.
8
Utility of immunoglobulin isotypes against LID-1 and NDO-LID for, particularly IgG1, confirming the diagnosis of multibacillary leprosy.针对LID-1和NDO-LID的免疫球蛋白同种型的效用,尤其是IgG1,对于确诊多菌型麻风具有重要意义。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(5):e170467. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760170467. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Leprosy As a Complex Infection: Breakdown of the Th1 and Th2 Immune Paradigm in the Immunopathogenesis of the Disease.麻风病作为一种复杂感染:疾病免疫发病机制中Th1和Th2免疫范式的瓦解
Front Immunol. 2017 Nov 28;8:1635. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01635. eCollection 2017.
10
Cytokines as biomarkers to monitoring the impact of multidrug therapy in immune response of leprosy patients.细胞因子作为生物标志物,监测麻风病患者免疫反应中多药治疗的影响。
Cytokine. 2017 Sep;97:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 29.