Hammer Maximilian, Santer Peter, Schaefer Maximilian S, Althoff Friederike C, Wongtangman Karuna, Frey Ulrich H, Xu Xinling, Eikermann Matthias, Fassbender Philipp
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anaesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;126(3):738-745. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.040. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
We examined the association between emergent postoperative tracheal intubation and the use of supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) vs tracheal tubes.
We included data from adult noncardiac surgical cases under general anaesthesia between 2008 and 2018. We only included cases (n=59 991) in which both airways were deemed to be feasible options. Multivariable logistic regression, instrumental variable analysis, propensity matching, and mediation analysis were used.
Use of a tracheal tube was associated with a higher risk of emergent postoperative intubation (adjusted absolute risk difference [ARD]=0.80%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.97; P<0.001), and a higher risk of post-extubation hypoxaemia (ARD=3.9%; 95% CI, 3.4-4.4; P<0.001). The effect was modified by the use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs); mediation analyses revealed that 28.9% (95% CI, 14.4-43.4%; P<0.001) of the main effect was attributable to NMBA. Airway management modified the association of NMBA and risk of emergent postoperative intubation (P=0.02). Patients managed with an SGA had higher odds of NMBA-associated reintubation compared to patients managed with a tracheal tube (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=3.65, 95% CI, 1.99-6.67 vs aOR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.29-2.18 [P<0.001], respectively).
In patients undergoing procedures under general anaesthesia that could be managed with either SGA or tracheal tube, use of an SGA was associated with lower risk of emergent postoperative intubation. The effect can partly be explained by use of NMBAs. Use of NMBAs in patients with an SGA appears to increase the risk of emergent postoperative intubation.
我们研究了术后紧急气管插管与声门上气道装置(SGA)和气管导管使用之间的关联。
我们纳入了2008年至2018年期间接受全身麻醉的成年非心脏手术病例的数据。我们仅纳入了两种气道均被认为是可行选择的病例(n = 59991)。使用了多变量逻辑回归、工具变量分析、倾向匹配和中介分析。
使用气管导管与术后紧急插管风险较高相关(调整后的绝对风险差异[ARD]=0.80%;95%置信区间[CI],0.64 - 0.97;P<0.001),以及拔管后低氧血症风险较高相关(ARD = 3.9%;95% CI,3.4 - 4.4;P<0.001)。该效应因使用非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)而有所改变;中介分析显示,主要效应的28.9%(95% CI,14.4 - 43.4%;P<0.001)可归因于NMBA。气道管理改变了NMBA与术后紧急插管风险之间的关联(P = 0.02)。与使用气管导管管理的患者相比,使用SGA管理的患者NMBA相关再插管的几率更高(调整后的优势比[aOR]=3.65,95% CI,1.99 - 6.67,而aOR = 1.68,95% CI,1.29 - 2.18[分别为P<0.001])。
在接受全身麻醉且可使用SGA或气管导管管理的手术患者中,使用SGA与术后紧急插管风险较低相关。该效应部分可通过使用NMBA来解释。在使用SGA的患者中使用NMBA似乎会增加术后紧急插管的风险。