Wang Z Y, Lin Y, Suo H N, Zhang Z R, Wang H J, Hao X P, Li Y X, Yang B T
Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China (Wang Ziyi is now working at the Department of Radiology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijing 102600, China).
CT/MR Room, Yantaishan Hospital of Yantai City, Shandong Province, Yantai 264001, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 15;100(46):3674-3679. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200720-02164.
To explore the value of speculating etiology of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) labyrinthine high signal ratio in patients with unilateral sudden deafness accompanied by vertigo and tinnitus and its relationship with hearing prognosis. Fifty-two patients with unilateral sudden deafness accompanied by vertigo and tinnitus who were admitted to Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from January 2016 to July 2019 were collected, including 27 males and 25 females, aged (47.7±15.1) years. The inner ear MRI data of 52 patients (17 plain scan, 35 enhanced scan) with unilateral sudden deafness were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists independently measured the labyrinthine high signal intensity of the affected side and the contralateral normal side on T1WI and enhanced T1WI and calculated the signal ratio (the normal labyrinth signal was subtracted from the affected signal and then divided by the normal signal). The etiology of the enhanced group was judged based on two methods, including whether the abnormal high signal was enhanced or not (unenhancement indicated hemorrhage and enhancement indicated inflammation), and the locations of labyrinthine involvement on enhanced three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) (inflammation usually involved the perilymph spaces, while hemorrhage involved the perilymph and endolymph spaces). In the plain group, the locations of labyrinthine involvement on 3D-FLAIR was applied to infer the potential etiology. The two methods presumed that 8 cases might be hemorrhage (22.9%, 8/35) and 27 be inflammation (77.1%, 27/35) in the enhanced group, which had a high consistency, while it was speculated that 7 patients might be hemorrhage (7/17) and 10 patients be inflammation (10/17) in the plain group. The measurement results of the two radiologists were highly consistent within and between the groups [the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were greater than 0.800]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the T1WI high signal ratio in the enhanced group for speculating etiology was 0.949 (<0.01), when the predictive threshold value was 0.467, with a sensitivity of 96.3% and a specificity of 87.5%. It might be hemorrhage when the ratio was higher than the threshold value, otherwise it was inflammation. The T1WI labyrinthine high signal ratio was higher in the hemorrhage group than that of the inflammation group, and the hearing prognosis was worse (all <0.05). The T1WI labyrinthine high signal ratio of the unrecovered group was higher than that of the recovered group (=0.034). The etiology of labyrinthine high signal formation can be inferred by quantitative values combined with the involved sites. The high signal in the labyrinth indicates poor hearing prognosis, the higher the signal intensity, the greater the possibility of hemorrhage and the worse the hearing prognosis.
探讨磁共振成像(MRI)T1加权成像(T1WI)内耳高信号率对单侧突发性聋伴眩晕耳鸣患者病因推测的价值及其与听力预后的关系。收集2016年1月至2019年7月首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院收治的52例单侧突发性聋伴眩晕耳鸣患者,其中男27例,女25例,年龄(47.7±15.1)岁。回顾性分析52例单侧突发性聋患者的内耳MRI资料(17例平扫,35例增强扫描)。两名放射科医师独立测量T1WI及增强T1WI上患侧及对侧正常侧内耳高信号强度,并计算信号率(患侧信号减去正常内耳信号后除以正常信号)。增强组病因判断基于两种方法,包括异常高信号是否强化(无强化提示出血,强化提示炎症)以及增强三维液体衰减反转恢复序列(3D-FLAIR)上内耳受累部位(炎症通常累及外淋巴间隙,出血累及外淋巴和内淋巴间隙)。平扫组应用3D-FLAIR上内耳受累部位推断潜在病因。两种方法推测增强组8例可能为出血(22.9%,8/35),27例为炎症(77.1%,27/35),一致性较高;平扫组推测7例可能为出血(7/17),10例为炎症(10/17)。两名放射科医师组内及组间测量结果一致性高[组内相关系数(ICC)值均大于0.800]。增强组T1WI高信号率推测病因的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.949(<0.01),预测阈值为0.467时,敏感度为96.3%,特异度为87.5%。比值高于阈值可能为出血,反之为炎症。出血组T1WI内耳高信号率高于炎症组,且听力预后更差(均<0.05)。未恢复组T1WI内耳高信号率高于恢复组(=0.034)。结合受累部位的定量值可推断内耳高信号形成的病因。内耳高信号提示听力预后差,信号强度越高,出血可能性越大,听力预后越差。