Zhu S C, Li Q F, Zhang X Y, Deng W Z, Song C Y, Wang X, Yan K
Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Department of Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050011, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 23;42(12):1040-1047. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191225-00842.
To explore the therapeutic efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved field irradiation (IFI) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, screen the patients suitable to undergo ENI radiotherapy and provide evidences for individual treatment of esophageal cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 924 patients with esophageal cancer who received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our hospital from January 2006 to December 2015. Among them, 272 patients received ENI and the other 652 patients received IFI. The clinicopathologic characteristics of 272 cases in ENI group and 652 cases in IFI group, who were recruited according to the balance of propensity score matching method, were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 1-year, 3-years and 5-years local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. The univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were also determined by Cox proportional hazard model and Long-rank test. The clinicopathologic characteristics of these two group were not significantly different (>0.05). The median follow-up time was 85.9 months and the follow-up rate was 95.9%. The 1-year, 3-years, 5-years PFS rates of the ENI groups were 65.3%, 31.7%, 18.4%, respectively, higher than 54.0%, 20.9%, 12.7% of the IFI group (=0.001). The 1-year, 3-years, 5-years OS rates of the ENI groups were 79.0%, 43.7%, 24.9%, respectively, higher than 75.0%, 31.8%, 17.2% of the IFI group (=0.003). In multivariate analysis, the sex, tumor volume, N stage and radiation field were independent factors for PFS and OS (<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with male, age≤66 year, cervical and upper-thoracic location, tumor length≤6 cm, T1-2 stage, N0-1 stage, Ⅰ-Ⅱ stage, tumor volume≤50 cm(3), dosage>60 Gy and≤2 cycles of chemotherapy in the ENI group had a better survival rate than those in the IFI group (<0.05). The total failure rate, local-regional failure rate in ENI group were significantly lower than those of IFI group (=0.001, =0.004). The incidence of bone marrow depression≥ grade 2 and 3 in ENI group was higher than that of the IFI group (<0.05). However, the incidences of radioactive esophagitis≥ grade 3, radioactive pneumonia and late adverse reactions were not significantly different between these two groups (>0.05). Compared with IFI, ENI can significantly improve the long-term survival for young, early TN stage and cervical/upper-thoracic esophageal cancer patients underwent chemotherapy.
探讨选择性淋巴结照射(ENI)与累及野照射(IFI)在食管癌调强放疗中的疗效及安全性,筛选适合ENI放疗的患者,为食管癌个体化治疗提供依据。回顾性分析2006年1月至2015年12月在我院接受根治性调强放疗的924例食管癌患者的临床资料。其中,272例接受ENI,另外652例接受IFI。采用倾向评分匹配法平衡后,比较ENI组272例和IFI组652例的临床病理特征。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算1年、3年和5年局部区域无失败生存率(LRFFS)、无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)。通过Cox比例风险模型和Long-rank检验对预后因素进行单因素和多因素分析。两组临床病理特征差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。中位随访时间为85.9个月,随访率为95.9%。ENI组1年、3年、5年PFS率分别为65.3%、31.7%、18.4%,高于IFI组的54.0%、20.9%、12.7%(=0.001)。ENI组1年、3年、5年OS率分别为79.0%、43.7%、24.9%,高于IFI组的75.0%、31.8%、17.2%(=0.003)。多因素分析显示,性别、肿瘤体积、N分期和照射野是PFS和OS的独立因素(<0.05)。亚组分析显示,ENI组中男性、年龄≤66岁、颈段和胸上段、肿瘤长度≤6 cm、T1-2期、N0-1期、Ⅰ-Ⅱ期、肿瘤体积≤50 cm³、剂量>60 Gy且化疗≤2周期的患者生存率优于IFI组(<0.05)。ENI组总失败率、局部区域失败率显著低于IFI组(=0.001,=0.004)。ENI组≥2级和3级骨髓抑制发生率高于IFI组(<0.05)。然而,两组≥3级放射性食管炎、放射性肺炎及晚期不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。与IFI相比,ENI可显著提高接受化疗的年轻、早期TN分期及颈段/胸上段食管癌患者的长期生存率。