Suppr超能文献

降压药物临床试验对伴有心血管疾病的真实世界患者的适用性。

Applicability of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drug Trials to Real-World Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

机构信息

From the Department of Vascular Medicine (N.E.B., W.S., F.L.J.V., J.W.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology (H.M.N.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):357-366. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15965. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess applicability of blood pressure-lowering drug trials to real-world secondary preventive care. We applied the eligibility criteria of the landmark blood pressure-lowering drug trials (EUROPA, PEACE, HOPE-peripheral arterial disease [PAD], PRoFESS, and PROGRESS) to patients with coronary artery disease (CAD; n=5155), peripheral arterial disease (PAD; n=1487), and cerebrovascular disease (n=2515) participating in the UCC-SMART cohort. Baseline differences according to trial eligibility were assessed. Differences in risk of all-cause mortality and a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular event) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Seventy-five percent of UCC-SMART patients with CAD would have been eligible for EUROPA, 84% for PEACE, 59% of patients with PAD for HOPE-PAD, 17% of patients with cerebrovascular disease for PRoFESS, and 100% for PROGRESS. Eligible patients were older (average difference ranging 1.4-14.6 years across trials). Eligible patients with CAD were at lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular event after adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors in PEACE (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.53-0.79]) and of mortality in both EUROPA (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.82]) and PEACE (0.63 [95% CI, 0.51-0.78]). Adjusted mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risks were not different between eligible and ineligible patients with PAD and cerebrovascular disease in HOPE-PAD, PRoFESS, and PROGRESS. The majority of real-world patients with CAD, PAD, or cerebrovascular disease would be eligible for landmark trials on blood pressure-lowering drugs. Patients with CAD ineligible for the EUROPA and PEACE trials are at higher adjusted mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risks, which may limit applicability of their results to ineligible patients.

摘要

本研究旨在评估降压药物试验在真实世界二级预防护理中的适用性。我们将具有里程碑意义的降压药物试验(EUROPA、PEACE、HOPE-外周动脉疾病[PAD]、PROGRESS 和 PROGRESS)的入选标准应用于冠状动脉疾病(CAD;n=5155)、外周动脉疾病(PAD;n=1487)和脑血管疾病(n=2515)患者的 UCC-SMART 队列中。根据试验入选标准评估了基线差异。使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算全因死亡率和心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中(主要不良心血管事件)复合终点的风险差异,调整了年龄、性别和心血管危险因素。UCC-SMART 中 75%的 CAD 患者将符合 EUROPA 的入选标准,84%的 PAD 患者符合 PEACE 的入选标准,59%的 PAD 患者符合 HOPE-PAD 的入选标准,17%的脑血管疾病患者符合 PRoFESS 的入选标准,而 100%的患者符合 PROGRESS 的入选标准。符合条件的患者年龄较大(各试验之间平均差异为 1.4-14.6 岁)。在调整了年龄、性别和心血管危险因素后,符合条件的 CAD 患者在 PEACE 中的主要不良心血管事件风险较低(风险比,0.65 [95%CI,0.53-0.79]),在 EUROPA 中的死亡率风险较低(风险比,0.72 [95%CI,0.62-0.82])和 PEACE(0.63 [95%CI,0.51-0.78])。在 HOPE-PAD、PROGRESS 和 PRoFESS 中,符合条件的 PAD 和脑血管疾病患者与不符合条件的患者之间,调整后的死亡率和主要不良心血管事件风险无差异。大多数患有 CAD、PAD 或脑血管疾病的真实世界患者将符合降压药物里程碑试验的入选标准。不符合 EUROPA 和 PEACE 试验入选标准的 CAD 患者的调整死亡率和主要不良心血管事件风险较高,这可能限制了其结果在不符合条件的患者中的适用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验