Honey Robert C, Dwyer Dominic M, Iliescu Adela F
Cardiff University, UK.
Learn Motiv. 2020 Nov;72:101658. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101658.
Pavlovian conditioning results in individual variation in the vigor and form of acquired behaviors. Here, we describe a general-process model of associative learning (HeiDI; How excitation and inhibition determine ideo-motion) that provides an analysis for such variation together with a range of other important group-level phenomena. The model takes as its starting point the idea that pairings of a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) result in the formation of reciprocal associations between their central representations. The asymptotic values of these associations and the rate at which these are reached are held to be influenced by the perceived salience of the CS (α) and US (β). Importantly, whether this associative knowledge is exhibited in behavior that reflects the properties of the CS (e.g., sign-tracking) or US (e.g., goal-tracking) is also influenced by the relative values of α and β. In this way, HeiDI provides an analysis for both quantitative and qualitative individual differences generated by Pavlovian conditioning procedures.
经典条件作用会导致习得行为的活力和形式出现个体差异。在此,我们描述了一种联想学习的通用过程模型(HeiDI;兴奋和抑制如何决定观念运动),该模型对这种差异以及一系列其他重要的群体层面现象进行了分析。该模型的出发点是这样一种观点,即条件刺激(CS)和无条件刺激(US)的配对会导致它们在中枢表征之间形成相互关联。这些关联的渐近值以及达到这些值的速率被认为受到CS(α)和US(β)的感知显著性的影响。重要的是,这种联想知识是否会在反映CS属性(例如,信号追踪)或US属性(例如,目标追踪)的行为中表现出来,也受到α和β相对值的影响。通过这种方式,HeiDI对经典条件作用程序产生的定量和定性个体差异都进行了分析。