• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人对全自动驾驶车辆停车意图的理解:随时间推移的学习效应

Pedestrians' Understanding of a Fully Autonomous Vehicle's Intent to Stop: A Learning Effect Over Time.

作者信息

Hochman Michal, Parmet Yisrael, Oron-Gilad Tal

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 3;11:585280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585280. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585280
PMID:33343458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7744601/
Abstract

This study explored pedestrians' understanding of Fully Autonomous Vehicles (FAVs) intention to stop and what influences pedestrians' decision to cross the road over time, i.e., learnability. Twenty participants saw fixed simulated urban road crossing scenes with a single FAV on the road as if they were pedestrians intending to cross. Scenes differed from one another in the FAV's, distance from the crossing place, its physical size, and external Human-Machine Interfaces (e-HMI) message by background color (red/green), message type (status/advice), and presentation modality (text/symbol). Eye-tracking data and decision measurements were collected. Results revealed that pedestrians tend to look at the e-HMI before making their decision. However, they did not necessarily decide according to the e-HMIs' color or message type. Moreover, when they complied with the e-HMI proposition, they tended to hesitate before making the decision. Overall, a learning effect over time was observed in all conditions regardless of e- HMI features and crossing context. Findings suggest that pedestrians' decision making depends on a combination of the e-HMI implementation and the car distance. Moreover, since the learning curve exists in all conditions and has the same proportion, it is critical to design an interaction that would encourage higher probability of compatible decisions from the first phase. However, to extend all these findings, it is necessary to further examine dynamic situations.

摘要

本研究探讨了行人对全自动驾驶汽车(FAV)停车意图的理解,以及随着时间推移,哪些因素会影响行人过马路的决定,即学习能力。20名参与者观看了固定的模拟城市道路交叉场景,道路上有一辆FAV,就好像他们是打算过马路的行人。场景之间的差异在于FAV与交叉路口的距离、其物理尺寸以及通过背景颜色(红色/绿色)、消息类型(状态/建议)和呈现方式(文本/符号)的外部人机界面(e-HMI)消息。收集了眼动追踪数据和决策测量数据。结果显示,行人在做出决定之前倾向于查看e-HMI。然而,他们不一定根据e-HMI的颜色或消息类型来做决定。此外,当他们遵循e-HMI的提议时,往往会在做出决定前犹豫不决。总体而言,无论e-HMI特征和交叉路口情况如何,在所有条件下都观察到了随着时间推移的学习效应。研究结果表明,行人的决策取决于e-HMI的实施情况和汽车距离的综合因素。此外,由于在所有条件下都存在学习曲线且比例相同,因此设计一种能够在第一阶段鼓励更高概率做出兼容决策的交互方式至关重要。然而,为了扩展所有这些发现,有必要进一步研究动态情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/1db74a9e48ea/fpsyg-11-585280-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/aa5c57d15e1d/fpsyg-11-585280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/a3f120d1d04f/fpsyg-11-585280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/4022d3fa6739/fpsyg-11-585280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/f38022869793/fpsyg-11-585280-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/c2b81ece326e/fpsyg-11-585280-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/26d448006324/fpsyg-11-585280-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/63afbbf142d6/fpsyg-11-585280-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/27c04d6e95c4/fpsyg-11-585280-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/1db74a9e48ea/fpsyg-11-585280-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/aa5c57d15e1d/fpsyg-11-585280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/a3f120d1d04f/fpsyg-11-585280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/4022d3fa6739/fpsyg-11-585280-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/f38022869793/fpsyg-11-585280-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/c2b81ece326e/fpsyg-11-585280-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/26d448006324/fpsyg-11-585280-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/63afbbf142d6/fpsyg-11-585280-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/27c04d6e95c4/fpsyg-11-585280-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75d9/7744601/1db74a9e48ea/fpsyg-11-585280-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Pedestrians' Understanding of a Fully Autonomous Vehicle's Intent to Stop: A Learning Effect Over Time.行人对全自动驾驶车辆停车意图的理解:随时间推移的学习效应
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 3;11:585280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585280. eCollection 2020.
2
Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.行人为配备 eHMI 的自动驾驶车辆在分隔和混合交通条件下的过街行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107115. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107115. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles from Pedestrians' Perspective: A Survey Study.面向行人的自动驾驶车辆外部人机界面:调查研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;22(9):3339. doi: 10.3390/s22093339.
4
Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.理解复杂的交通道路场景:以儿童行人危险感知为例。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:111-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle's Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles.迈向自动驾驶车辆与行人通信的整体通信方法:将车辆运动学与不同尺寸自动驾驶车辆的外部人机界面相结合。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:882394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882394. eCollection 2022.
6
External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.自动驾驶车辆外部人机界面:对行人穿越决策的影响。
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1353-1370. doi: 10.1177/0018720819836343. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.提高行人和自动驾驶车辆交互体验:外部人机界面的工效学比较。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Oct;96:103478. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103478. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Hello, is it me you're Stopping for? The Effect of external Human Machine Interface Familiarity on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour in an Ambiguous Situation.你好,你停下脚步是因为我吗?外部人机交互熟悉度对行人在模糊情境中过街行为的影响。
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar;67(3):264-279. doi: 10.1177/00187208241272070. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
9
How to improve pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles: new road infrastructure, external human-machine interface with anthropomorphism, or conventional road signaling?如何提高行人对自动驾驶车辆的信任:新型道路基础设施、具有拟人化的外部人机交互界面,还是传统道路信号?
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1129341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129341. eCollection 2023.
10
Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.作为行人过马路决策和自动驾驶车辆行为估计的隐式通信信号的减速参数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Sep;190:107173. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107173. Epub 2023 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of LSTM, Transformers, and MLP-mixer neural networks for gaze based human intention prediction.用于基于注视的人类意图预测的长短期记忆网络、变换器和多层感知器混合神经网络的比较
Front Neurorobot. 2023 May 25;17:1157957. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1157957. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
How should external human-machine interfaces behave? Examining the effects of colour, position, message, activation distance, vehicle yielding, and visual distraction among 1,434 participants.外部人机界面应如何表现?在 1434 名参与者中,考察了颜色、位置、信息、激活距离、车辆避让和视觉干扰对其的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Sep;95:103450. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103450. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Pedestrian distraction: The effects of road environment complexity and age on pedestrian's visual attention and crossing behavior.行人分心:道路环境复杂性和年龄对行人视觉注意和穿行行为的影响。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
3
External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work.
用于自动驾驶车辆与行人通信的外部人机界面:实证研究综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02757. eCollection 2019.
4
An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?一项关于设计和评估标准的实验研究:行人和自动驾驶车辆之间的交流什么是重要的?
Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:272-282. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart.一种新型对比敏感度视力测试图。
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984 Jun;61(6):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198406000-00011.