Suppr超能文献

药品的结构化效益-风险评估:文献中定量效益-风险评估结果综述

Structured benefit-risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit-risk assessment findings in the literature.

作者信息

Kürzinger Marie-Laure, Douarin Ludivine, Uzun Ievgeniia, El-Haddad Chantal, Hurst William, Juhaeri Juhaeri, Tcherny-Lessenot Stéphanie

机构信息

Global Epidemiology & Benefit-Risk Evaluation, Sanofi, 1, Avenue Pierre Brossolette - 91385 Chilly-Mazarin, 91000, France.

Global Epidemiology & Benefit-Risk Evaluation, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Dec 8;11:2042098620976951. doi: 10.1177/2042098620976951. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

A favorable benefit-risk profile remains an essential requirement for marketing authorization of medicinal drugs and devices. Furthermore, prior subjective, implicit and inconsistent ad hoc benefit-risk assessment methods have rightly evolved towards more systematic, explicit or "structured" approaches. Contemporary structured benefit-risk evaluation aims at providing an objective assessment of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products and a higher transparency for decision making purposes. The use of a descriptive framework should be the preferred starting point for a structured benefit-risk assessment. In support of more precise assessments, quantitative and semi-quantitative methodologies have been developed and utilized to complement descriptive or qualitative frameworks in order to facilitate the structured evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products. In addition, quantitative structured benefit-risk analysis allows integration of patient preference data. Collecting patient perspectives throughout the medical product development process has become increasingly important and key to the regulatory decision-making process. Both industry and regulatory authorities increasingly rely on descriptive structured benefit-risk evaluation and frameworks in drug, vaccine and device evaluation and comparison. Although varied qualitative methods are more commonplace, quantitative approaches have recently been emphasized. However, it is unclear how frequently these quantitative frameworks have been used by pharmaceutical companies to support submission dossiers for drug approvals or to respond to the health authorities' requests. The objective of this study has been to identify and review, for the first time, currently available, published, structured, quantitative benefit-risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

The review of the benefits and the risks associated with a medicinal product is called benefit-risk assessment. One of the conditions for a medicinal product to receive marketing authorization is to demonstrate a positive benefit-risk balance in which the benefits outweigh the risks. In order to enhance the transparency and consistency in the assessment of benefit-risk balance, frameworks and quantitative methods have been developed for decision making purposes and regulatory approvals of medicinal products. This article considers published quantitative benefit-risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval.

摘要

未标注

有利的效益风险状况仍然是药品和器械上市许可的一项基本要求。此外,先前主观、隐含且不一致的临时效益风险评估方法已合理地朝着更系统、明确或“结构化”的方法发展。当代结构化效益风险评估旨在对药品的效益风险状况进行客观评估,并提高决策的透明度。使用描述性框架应是结构化效益风险评估的首选起点。为支持更精确的评估,已开发并利用定量和半定量方法来补充描述性或定性框架,以促进对药品效益风险状况的结构化评估。此外,定量结构化效益风险分析允许整合患者偏好数据。在整个医疗产品开发过程中收集患者观点已变得越来越重要,并且是监管决策过程的关键。行业和监管机构在药品、疫苗和器械评估及比较中越来越依赖描述性结构化效益风险评估和框架。尽管各种定性方法更为常见,但最近定量方法受到了强调。然而,尚不清楚制药公司使用这些定量框架来支持药品批准申报文件或回应卫生当局要求的频率有多高。本研究的目的是首次识别和审查目前可用的、已发表的、结构化的定量效益风险评估,这些评估可能为医疗保健专业人员和/或付款人提供了信息,并有助于药品、疫苗和/或器械批准监管环境中的决策。

通俗易懂的总结

对药品相关的效益和风险进行审查称为效益风险评估。药品获得上市许可的条件之一是证明积极的效益风险平衡,即效益大于风险。为了提高效益风险平衡评估的透明度和一致性,已开发出框架和定量方法用于药品的决策和监管批准。本文考虑了已发表的定量效益风险评估,这些评估可能为医疗保健专业人员和/或付款人提供了信息,并有助于药品、疫苗和/或器械批准监管环境中的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b208/7727082/a54c0c349b3b/10.1177_2042098620976951-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Structured benefit-risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit-risk assessment findings in the literature.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Dec 8;11:2042098620976951. doi: 10.1177/2042098620976951. eCollection 2020.
3
Regulatory requirements and optimization of multiple criteria decision analysis to quantify the benefit-risk assessment of medical devices.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Apr;20(4):273-281. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2190021. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
A Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Operating Model for Investigational Medicinal Products in the Pharmaceutical Industry.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):849-864. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00508-2. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
9
10
Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment: State of the Practice Within Industry.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Mar;55(2):415-425. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00230-3. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Additional Monitoring on Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacists' Role: A Scoping Review.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70201. doi: 10.1002/pds.70201.
2
Pharmacovigilance processes in low- and middle-income countries: moving from data collection to data analysis and interpretation.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Jun 11;16:20420986241300006. doi: 10.1177/20420986241300006. eCollection 2025.
3
Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision-making: A scoping review.
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1926-1939. doi: 10.1111/risa.17715. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
4
Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70099. doi: 10.1002/pds.70099.
6
Exploring different objectives in non-inferiority trials.
BMJ. 2024 Jun 17;385:e078000. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078000.
9
Competing Benefits and Competing Hazards: The Benefit to Harm Balance in Individual Patients in Rational Therapeutics.
Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;47(8):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01428-2. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
Drug Repurposing Using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
Curr Drug Targets. 2024;25(7):454-464. doi: 10.2174/0113894501290296240327081624.

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing structured decision-making in drug regulation at the FDA and EMA.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;87(2):395-405. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14425. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Multicriteria Decision Analysis Applied to the Clinical Use of Pharmacotherapy for Overactive Bladder Symptom Complex.
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):522-530. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.020. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
Benefit-risk evaluation: the past, present and future.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Aug 26;10:2042098619871180. doi: 10.1177/2042098619871180. eCollection 2019.
4
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jul;24(7):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.
7
Benefit, risk and cost of new oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation; A multicriteria decision analysis.
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0196361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196361. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparison of Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis.
Value Health. 2017 Dec;20(10):1394-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
Use of multicriteria decision analysis for assessing the benefit and risk of over-the-counter analgesics.
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;69(10):1364-1373. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12770. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验