Kürzinger Marie-Laure, Douarin Ludivine, Uzun Ievgeniia, El-Haddad Chantal, Hurst William, Juhaeri Juhaeri, Tcherny-Lessenot Stéphanie
Global Epidemiology & Benefit-Risk Evaluation, Sanofi, 1, Avenue Pierre Brossolette - 91385 Chilly-Mazarin, 91000, France.
Global Epidemiology & Benefit-Risk Evaluation, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Dec 8;11:2042098620976951. doi: 10.1177/2042098620976951. eCollection 2020.
A favorable benefit-risk profile remains an essential requirement for marketing authorization of medicinal drugs and devices. Furthermore, prior subjective, implicit and inconsistent ad hoc benefit-risk assessment methods have rightly evolved towards more systematic, explicit or "structured" approaches. Contemporary structured benefit-risk evaluation aims at providing an objective assessment of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products and a higher transparency for decision making purposes. The use of a descriptive framework should be the preferred starting point for a structured benefit-risk assessment. In support of more precise assessments, quantitative and semi-quantitative methodologies have been developed and utilized to complement descriptive or qualitative frameworks in order to facilitate the structured evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products. In addition, quantitative structured benefit-risk analysis allows integration of patient preference data. Collecting patient perspectives throughout the medical product development process has become increasingly important and key to the regulatory decision-making process. Both industry and regulatory authorities increasingly rely on descriptive structured benefit-risk evaluation and frameworks in drug, vaccine and device evaluation and comparison. Although varied qualitative methods are more commonplace, quantitative approaches have recently been emphasized. However, it is unclear how frequently these quantitative frameworks have been used by pharmaceutical companies to support submission dossiers for drug approvals or to respond to the health authorities' requests. The objective of this study has been to identify and review, for the first time, currently available, published, structured, quantitative benefit-risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval.
The review of the benefits and the risks associated with a medicinal product is called benefit-risk assessment. One of the conditions for a medicinal product to receive marketing authorization is to demonstrate a positive benefit-risk balance in which the benefits outweigh the risks. In order to enhance the transparency and consistency in the assessment of benefit-risk balance, frameworks and quantitative methods have been developed for decision making purposes and regulatory approvals of medicinal products. This article considers published quantitative benefit-risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval.
有利的效益风险状况仍然是药品和器械上市许可的一项基本要求。此外,先前主观、隐含且不一致的临时效益风险评估方法已合理地朝着更系统、明确或“结构化”的方法发展。当代结构化效益风险评估旨在对药品的效益风险状况进行客观评估,并提高决策的透明度。使用描述性框架应是结构化效益风险评估的首选起点。为支持更精确的评估,已开发并利用定量和半定量方法来补充描述性或定性框架,以促进对药品效益风险状况的结构化评估。此外,定量结构化效益风险分析允许整合患者偏好数据。在整个医疗产品开发过程中收集患者观点已变得越来越重要,并且是监管决策过程的关键。行业和监管机构在药品、疫苗和器械评估及比较中越来越依赖描述性结构化效益风险评估和框架。尽管各种定性方法更为常见,但最近定量方法受到了强调。然而,尚不清楚制药公司使用这些定量框架来支持药品批准申报文件或回应卫生当局要求的频率有多高。本研究的目的是首次识别和审查目前可用的、已发表的、结构化的定量效益风险评估,这些评估可能为医疗保健专业人员和/或付款人提供了信息,并有助于药品、疫苗和/或器械批准监管环境中的决策。
对药品相关的效益和风险进行审查称为效益风险评估。药品获得上市许可的条件之一是证明积极的效益风险平衡,即效益大于风险。为了提高效益风险平衡评估的透明度和一致性,已开发出框架和定量方法用于药品的决策和监管批准。本文考虑了已发表的定量效益风险评估,这些评估可能为医疗保健专业人员和/或付款人提供了信息,并有助于药品、疫苗和/或器械批准监管环境中的决策。