Suppr超能文献

肿瘤学高级执业提供者的多样性意识与记录实践

Diversity Awareness and Documentation Practices Among Oncology Advanced Practice Providers.

作者信息

Poillucci Victoria, Page Christina Z

机构信息

Duke Cancer Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 May-Jun;10(4):347-354. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.4.3. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

Advanced practice providers (APPs) care for widely diverse populations. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) states that bias, prejudice, and stereotyping by a health-care provider may contribute to disparities, which are associated with worse outcomes. The IOM called for efforts to increase awareness among health-care providers. The objective of this study is to assess the cultural self-awareness of oncology APPs who practice in a community-based outpatient cancer center and investigate the extent to which APPs include cultural care into patient assessments and document this data. Oncology APPs completed a questionnaire evaluating cultural self-awareness. A prospective, quality improvement chart review was performed to analyze the extent to which cultural themes were addressed during oncology clinic visits. A list of cultural keywords was used as a guide. About 10% of the 2015 cancer population at the institution was examined, which included a stratified sample of the top six disease groups. Responses were analyzed. All APPs demonstrated average or above-average cultural awareness. Documentation of cultural assessment was low. Of the 28 cultural keyword items, an average of 4.88 items were addressed during each visit. Multiple cultural items, including literacy, language, insurance status, and belief about the disease were addressed less than 5% of the time.

摘要

高级执业提供者(APPs)为广泛多样的人群提供护理。医学研究所(IOM)指出,医疗保健提供者的偏见、歧视和刻板印象可能会导致差异,而这些差异与更差的结果相关。IOM呼吁努力提高医疗保健提供者的意识。本研究的目的是评估在社区门诊癌症中心执业的肿瘤学APPs的文化自我意识,并调查APPs在患者评估中纳入文化护理并记录这些数据的程度。肿瘤学APPs完成了一份评估文化自我意识的问卷。进行了一项前瞻性的质量改进图表审查,以分析在肿瘤门诊就诊期间文化主题被提及的程度。使用一份文化关键词列表作为指导。对该机构2015年癌症患者群体的约10%进行了检查,其中包括前六大疾病组的分层样本。对回复进行了分析。所有APPs都表现出平均或高于平均水平的文化意识。文化评估的记录较少。在每次就诊期间,28个文化关键词项目中平均有4.88个项目被提及。包括识字能力、语言、保险状况和对疾病的信念在内的多个文化项目被提及的时间不到5%。

相似文献

3
4
Implicit bias toward cervical cancer: Provider and training differences.对宫颈癌的隐性偏见:提供者和培训的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Guidelines for implementing culturally competent nursing care.实施具有文化胜任力的护理的指南。
J Transcult Nurs. 2014 Apr;25(2):109-21. doi: 10.1177/1043659614520998. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
Measures of cultural competence in nurses: an integrative review.护士文化能力的衡量:一项综合综述。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 May 30;2013:289101. doi: 10.1155/2013/289101. Print 2013.
5
Cultural competence in oncology: where do we stand?肿瘤学中的文化能力:我们目前的状况如何?
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jan;21(1):3-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp546. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
9
Transcultural concepts in nursing care.
J Transcult Nurs. 2002 Jul;13(3):178-80. doi: 10.1177/10459602013003002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验