• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线度伐利尤单抗联合顺铂-依托泊苷用于广泛期小细胞肺癌:一项成本效益分析。

First-Line Durvalumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Platinum-Etoposide for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Longfeng, Hang Yongfu, Liu Maobai, Li Na, Cai Hongfu

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 4;10:602185. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.602185. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.602185
PMID:33344252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide platinum-etoposide as first-line treatments for small-cell lung cancer from the perspective of the US payer.

METHODS

This study established a partition survival model for three health states, metastasis probability, and safety data based on the CASPIAN clinical trial. The health utility value was mainly derived from the published literature. Only direct medical costs were considered. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide increased QALY by 0.220 compared to that observed with platinum-etoposide only. The cost increased by $78,198.75 and the incremental cost per QALY increased by $355,448.86. One-way and probability sensitivity analyses indicated that the model parameters varied within a limited range and had no significant effect on the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide can improve quality of life, it also substantially increases the cost of medical treatment. Under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, durvalumab does not have a cost-effective comparative advantage.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是从美国医保支付方的角度评估度伐利尤单抗联合铂类-依托泊苷与铂类-依托泊苷作为小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

本研究基于CASPIAN临床试验建立了一个包含三种健康状态、转移概率和安全性数据的分区生存模型。健康效用值主要来源于已发表的文献。仅考虑直接医疗成本。进行敏感性分析以评估每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本的稳健性。

结果

与仅使用铂类-依托泊苷相比,度伐利尤单抗联合铂类-依托泊苷使QALY增加了0.220。成本增加了78,198.75美元,每QALY的增量成本增加了355,448.86美元。单向和概率敏感性分析表明,模型参数在有限范围内变化,对结果无显著影响。

结论

尽管度伐利尤单抗联合铂类-依托泊苷可改善生活质量,但也大幅增加了医疗成本。在支付意愿阈值为100,000美元的情况下,度伐利尤单抗不具有成本效益比较优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/932d16f17e43/fonc-10-602185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/928899f645ea/fonc-10-602185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/dc44b28a28c0/fonc-10-602185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/932d16f17e43/fonc-10-602185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/928899f645ea/fonc-10-602185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/dc44b28a28c0/fonc-10-602185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb95/7747765/932d16f17e43/fonc-10-602185-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
First-Line Durvalumab Plus Platinum-Etoposide Platinum-Etoposide for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.一线度伐利尤单抗联合顺铂-依托泊苷用于广泛期小细胞肺癌:一项成本效益分析。
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 4;10:602185. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.602185. eCollection 2020.
2
First-Line Durvalumab in Addition to Etoposide and Platinum for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A U.S.-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.广泛期小细胞肺癌中依托泊苷和铂类药物联合一线 durvalumab 治疗:一项基于美国的成本效益分析。
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):e2013-e2020. doi: 10.1002/onco.13954. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus etoposide: platinum in the first-line therapy of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer from the Chinese payers' perspective.度伐利尤单抗联合依托泊苷对比依托泊苷联合顺铂/卡铂用于广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析:中国支付者视角。
Tumori. 2022 Feb;108(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/0300891620985309. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.度伐利尤单抗、替西木单抗和依托泊苷-铂类药物一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 19;103(16):e37836. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037836.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Durvalumab Plus Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.度伐利尤单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Aug 4;19(10):1141-1147. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7796.
6
Durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide alone in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): updated results from a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.度伐利尤单抗联合或不联合 Tremelimumab 与单用依托泊苷联合顺铂一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(CASPIAN):一项随机、对照、开放标签、3 期临床试验的更新结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):51-65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30539-8. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.度伐利尤单抗联合铂类依托泊苷与铂类依托泊苷一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(CASPIAN):一项随机、对照、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1929-1939. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32222-6. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
First-Line Chemo-Immunotherapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.广泛期小细胞肺癌的一线化疗免疫疗法:一项基于美国的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 29;11:699781. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.699781. eCollection 2021.
9
Patient-reported outcomes with first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III study.度伐利尤单抗联合铂类-依托泊苷与铂类-依托泊苷一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的患者报告结局(CASPIAN):一项随机、对照、开放标签的III期研究。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Nov;149:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0258605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258605. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of the addition of sintilimab as a first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a Chinese healthcare system perspective.从中国医疗保健系统角度看,信迪利单抗作为局部晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌一线治疗药物的成本效益
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jan 10;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00588-2.
2
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Combination Treatment with Chemotherapy for Patients with Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Japan.在日本,广泛期小细胞肺癌患者一线化疗联合阿替利珠单抗与度伐利尤单抗比较的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Oct;44(10):749-759. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01383-x. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Durvalumab vs placebo consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated PACIFIC trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.度伐利尤单抗与安慰剂用于III期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后的巩固治疗:基于PACIFIC试验的最新成本效益分析
Lung Cancer. 2020 Aug;146:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
United States Life Tables, 2017.《2017年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(7):1-66.
3
Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.
免疫检查点抑制剂作为晚期胆道癌一线治疗的成本效益分析。
Immunotherapy. 2024;16(10):669-678. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2024.2347822. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Serum albumin and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are potential predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in small cell lung cancer.血清白蛋白和衍生的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是小细胞肺癌免疫检查点抑制剂的潜在预测生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 7;15:1327449. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1327449. eCollection 2024.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.度伐利尤单抗、替西木单抗和依托泊苷-铂类药物一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 19;103(16):e37836. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037836.
6
Cost-effectiveness of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.免疫治疗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析:系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09727-7.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer based on the TOPAZ-1 trial.基于TOPAZ-1试验的度伐利尤单抗联合化疗作为晚期胆管癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Mar 1;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00429-9.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.度伐利尤单抗联合化疗作为一线治疗胆道癌的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;11:1046424. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1046424. eCollection 2023.
9
Economic evaluation of first-line sugemalimab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China.中国转移性非小细胞肺癌一线苏金单抗联合化疗的经济学评价
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;12:1081750. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1081750. eCollection 2022.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab combined with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.阿地瑞利单抗联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 26;13:1019826. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1019826. eCollection 2022.
度伐利尤单抗联合铂类依托泊苷与铂类依托泊苷一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(CASPIAN):一项随机、对照、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1929-1939. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32222-6. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Immunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: from molecular promises to clinical challenges.小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗:从分子前景到临床挑战。
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Aug 5;7(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0690-1.
5
First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.贝伐珠单抗联合化疗基础上加用一线阿替利珠单抗治疗转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌:一项基于美国的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;125(20):3526-3534. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32368. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Emerging therapies for small cell lung cancer.小细胞肺癌的新兴疗法。
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 May 2;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0736-3.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.阿替利珠单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Apr;130:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
8
First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌:成本效果分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):491-496. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7086.
9
Cost-effectiveness and Budgetary Consequence Analysis of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy vs No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Context of the US Health Care System.在考虑到美国医疗保健系统的情况下,durvalumab 巩固治疗与放化疗后不进行巩固治疗在 III 期非小细胞肺癌中的成本效果和预算后果分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):358-365. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5449.
10
First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.阿替利珠单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2220-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064. Epub 2018 Sep 25.