• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是时候了。经腹宫颈长度筛查的优势。

It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(24):4797-4802. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1864317. Epub 2020 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2020.1864317
PMID:33345666
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sonographic cervical length (CL) measurement has become a standard practice for identifying women at increased risk for preterm birth. We aimed to assess the time needed for CL measurement during fetal anatomy scan using either transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasound, and to provide a predictive value of the transabdominal CL measurements for reassuring transvaginal CL measurements of more than 25 mm.

METHODS

In a prospective study we measured CL transabdominally, and transvaginally in all the anatomy scans performed at 18-25 weeks' gestation, from January 2017 until January 2018. CL and the duration of the examination were compared between the two approaches. Adjustments were made for, body mass index, previous cesarean sections and parity.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-eight patients participated in the study. The time needed for the transabdominal CL measurement was significantly lower compare with the transvaginal CL measurement (0.46 ± 0.3 min versus 6.9 ± 1.38 min,  < 0.001). The CL measured transabdominally was significantly shorter than the CL measured transvaginally (36.7 ± 6.7 mm versus 41.9 ± 7.3 mm, respectively  < 0.001). All women with transabdominal CL measurements above 36 mm (64.2% of patients) had a transvaginal CL of more than 25 mm.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal measurement of CL is a time-consuming procedure that prolong fetal anomaly scan by 25%. Transabdominal CL measurement of 36 mm is reassuring CL above 25 mm. Transabdominal ultrasound should be used as an initial tool for CL screening. Transvaginal measurements of CL should be reserved for high-risk women, for women with difficulties in demonstrating the cervix abdominally, and for women with transabdominal measurements of less than 36 mm.

摘要

目的

超声测量宫颈长度(CL)已成为识别早产风险增加的女性的标准方法。本研究旨在评估在胎儿解剖扫描中使用经腹或经阴道超声测量 CL 的时间,并为经阴道 CL 测量值超过 25mm 时经腹 CL 测量值的预测值提供依据。

方法

前瞻性研究纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月在 18-25 周行胎儿解剖扫描的所有孕妇,分别行经腹和经阴道 CL 测量。比较两种方法的 CL 及检查时间,并对体质量指数、既往剖宫产史和产次进行校正。

结果

共 468 例孕妇纳入研究。与经阴道 CL 测量相比,经腹 CL 测量时间明显缩短(0.46±0.3min 比 6.9±1.38min, <0.001)。经腹 CL 测量值明显短于经阴道 CL 测量值(36.7±6.7mm 比 41.9±7.3mm, <0.001)。所有经腹 CL 测量值大于 36mm(64.2%的患者)的孕妇经阴道 CL 测量值均大于 25mm。

结论

经阴道 CL 测量耗时,使胎儿畸形扫描时间延长 25%。经腹 CL 测量值 36mm 可预测经阴道 CL 测量值大于 25mm。经腹超声应作为 CL 筛查的初始工具。对于经阴道 CL 测量值大于 25mm 的高危孕妇、经腹部难以显示宫颈的孕妇以及经腹 CL 测量值小于 36mm 的孕妇,应保留经阴道 CL 测量。

相似文献

1
It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening.是时候了。经腹宫颈长度筛查的优势。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(24):4797-4802. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1864317. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
2
[Transabdominal-transvaginal ultrasound cervical length sequential screening to predict the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancy women with low risk of preterm birth].经腹-经阴道超声宫颈长度序贯筛查预测单胎妊娠低早产风险妇女自发性早产风险
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 25;59(9):667-674. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20240508-00266.
3
Assessment of a cervicometer compared to transvaginal ultrasound in identifying women with a short cervical length: a multicenter study.与经阴道超声相比,使用宫颈测量仪识别宫颈长度短的女性的评估:一项多中心研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate.经腹超声检查是合适的。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):739-743.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020.
5
Not transabdominal!不要经腹!
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):739-744.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.019.
6
Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention.经腹超声用于预防早产的宫颈长度筛查的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;209(6):546.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
7
Correlation Between Cervical Lengths Measured by Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonography for Predicting Preterm Birth.经腹超声与经阴道超声测量宫颈长度预测早产的相关性
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Mar;35(3):537-44. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.03026. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Can transabdominal ultrasound identify women at high risk for short cervical length?经腹超声能否识别短宫颈长度风险高的女性?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jun;92(6):637-41. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12111. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
9
[Predictive value of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound during the second and the third trimester of pregnancy for preterm birth in twin pregnancies].[经阴道超声测量孕中期和孕晚期宫颈长度对双胎妊娠早产的预测价值]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 May 25;54(5):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.05.006.
10
Comparison of cervical lengths using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in midpregnancy.经腹超声与经阴道超声在中孕期测量宫颈长度的比较。
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Oct;32(10):1721-8. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.10.1721.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing transabdominal and transvaginal cervical length measurements at mid-trimester fetal anomaly scan: The impact of bladder fullness and lower uterine contractions.孕中期胎儿结构超声检查中经腹与经阴道测量宫颈长度的比较:膀胱充盈度及子宫下段收缩的影响
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Aug 29;27(4):218-228. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12409. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Consistency in the transabdominal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in mid-pregnancy.孕中期经腹超声测量宫颈长度的一致性
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jun 3;25(3):127-136. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12303. eCollection 2022 Aug.