• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于附件的干预措施用于心血管疾病患者及其伴侣:概念验证研究。

An attachment-based intervention for patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners: A proof-of-concept study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation.

Department of Psychoeducation and Psychology.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;40(12):909-919. doi: 10.1037/hea0001034. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1037/hea0001034
PMID:33346674
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Couple distress is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, whereas support is associated with heart-healthy behaviors and better CVD outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical benefit of the Healing Hearts Together (HHT) intervention, an attachment-based relationship enhancement program for couples in which 1 partner has CVD, on relationship quality, mental health, and quality of life (QoL).

METHOD

Patients from a tertiary cardiac care center and their partners (N = 78; 39 couples) attended the 8-session HHT group. Participants completed validated, self-report questionnaires pre- and postintervention, including the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the SF-36 (QoL). At intervention completion, participants completed a satisfaction survey. Between-groups comparisons (patient/partner) were examined with analysis of variance. Paired-sample t tests were used to assess changes over time with HHT participation for the complete sample and for patients and partners separately.

RESULTS

Many participants reported relationship and psychological distress at baseline. Clinically and statistically significant changes from pre to postintervention were observed for relationship distress (DAS: +7.8 points; p < .001; CSI changes [+3.6] were clinically significant) and depression (-1.8; p < .001), whereas statistically significant changes occurred for anxiety (-1.5; p < .001), and physical (+2.1; p = .047) and mental (+3.3; p < .001) QoL. Patients, but not partners, reported statistically significant changes in QoL-mental component summary. Clinically and statistically significant changes were observed for anxiety for partners, but not patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The HHT intervention was beneficial for patients' and partners' relationship quality, mental health, and QoL. A larger randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of this intervention on relationship quality, mental health and QoL is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

未加标签

夫妻关系紧张与心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素有关,而支持则与心脏健康行为和更好的 CVD 结果有关。

目的

评估“一起治愈心灵”(HHT)干预的临床益处,这是一种基于依恋的伴侣关系增强计划,适用于一方患有 CVD 的夫妻,该计划评估了对夫妻关系质量、心理健康和生活质量(QoL)的影响。

方法

来自三级心脏护理中心的患者及其伴侣(N=78;39 对夫妻)参加了 8 节 HHT 小组。参与者在干预前后完成了经过验证的自我报告问卷,包括对偶调整量表(DAS)、夫妻满意度指数(CSI)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和 SF-36(QoL)。在干预结束时,参与者完成了一份满意度调查。采用方差分析比较组间差异(患者/伴侣)。使用配对样本 t 检验评估了完整样本以及患者和伴侣分别随 HHT 参与的时间变化。

结果

许多参与者在基线时报告了关系和心理困扰。与干预前相比,干预后观察到关系困扰(DAS:+7.8 分;p<0.001;CSI 变化[+3.6]具有临床意义)和抑郁(-1.8;p<0.001)显著改善,而焦虑(-1.5;p<0.001)、身体(+2.1;p=0.047)和心理(+3.3;p<0.001)QoL 也有统计学意义的改善。患者而非伴侣报告 QoL 心理成分综合有统计学意义的变化。伴侣的焦虑也观察到了有临床意义和统计学意义的变化,但患者没有。

结论

HHT 干预对患者和伴侣的关系质量、心理健康和 QoL 有益。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来评估该干预对关系质量、心理健康和 QoL 的影响。

相似文献

1
An attachment-based intervention for patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners: A proof-of-concept study.基于附件的干预措施用于心血管疾病患者及其伴侣:概念验证研究。
Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;40(12):909-919. doi: 10.1037/hea0001034. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Dyadic patterns of mental health and quality of life change in partners and patients during three months of cardiac rehabilitation.在心脏康复的三个月中,伴侣和患者的心理健康和生活质量变化呈现出二元模式。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Dec;37(8):1315-1321. doi: 10.1037/fam0000898. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Dyadic effects of anxiety and depression on quality of life among couples facing cardiovascular disease.焦虑和抑郁对心血管疾病患者夫妇生活质量的双向影响。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct;149:110601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110601. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
Psychological distress of cancer patients with children under 18 years and their partners-a longitudinal study of family relationships using dyadic data analysis.有18岁以下子女的癌症患者及其伴侣的心理困扰——一项使用二元数据分析对家庭关系进行的纵向研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):255-264. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3411-z. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
5
Illness uncertainty, partner support, and quality of life: A dyadic longitudinal investigation of couples facing prostate cancer.疾病不确定性、伴侣支持与生活质量:夫妻共同面对前列腺癌的纵向研究
Psychooncology. 2019 Nov;28(11):2188-2194. doi: 10.1002/pon.5205. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Quality of life and dyadic adjustment in oral cancer patients and their female partners.口腔癌患者及其女性伴侣的生活质量与二元调适
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Mar;17(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00817.x.
7
Learning a new way of living together: a qualitative study exploring the relationship changes and intervention needs of patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners.学习一种新的相处方式:一项定性研究,探索心血管疾病患者及其伴侣关系变化和干预需求。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 6;10(5):e032948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032948.
8
Quality of life, anxiety and depression of German, Italian and French couples undergoing cross-border oocyte donation in Spain.中德、中意和中法跨境捐卵夫妇在西班牙的生活质量、焦虑和抑郁情况。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1862-1870. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex247.
9
A Dyadic Perspective on Coping and its Effects on Relationship Quality and Psychological Distress in Couples Living with Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Study.夫妻应对方式及其对慢性疼痛患者婚姻质量和心理困扰影响的双重观点:一项纵向研究。
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):e102-e113. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz267.
10
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.聚焦于夫妻的干预措施对局限性前列腺癌男性及其配偶的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Healing Hearts Together - an emotionally focused intervention for couples after a cardiac event: a randomized controlled trial protocol.携手治愈心灵——心脏事件后针对夫妻的情感聚焦干预:一项随机对照试验方案
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1564666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1564666. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of dyadic psychoeducational interventions for haemodialysis patients and their family caregivers: a randomised controlled trial.针对血液透析患者及其家庭照顾者的二元心理教育干预措施的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 4;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02835-1.
3
Partners Now Parents: Supporting Couples During the Journey to Parenthood.
伴侣变父母:在为人父母的旅程中支持夫妻。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13097. doi: 10.1111/famp.13097.
4
How Does Trauma Make You Sick? The Role of Attachment in Explaining Somatic Symptoms of Survivors of Childhood Trauma.创伤如何使人生病?依恋在解释童年创伤幸存者躯体症状中的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 15;12(2):203. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020203.
5
Psychological couple-oriented interventions for patients with heart disease and their partners: a scoping review and guidelines for future interventions.针对心脏病患者及其伴侣的以夫妻为导向的心理干预措施:一项范围综述及未来干预指南。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 29;14:1194767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1194767. eCollection 2023.
6
Interventions for Caregivers of Heart Disease Patients in Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.心脏病患者康复中照顾者的干预措施:范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2023 Jul 28;13(3):1016-1029. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030089.
7
Attachment insecurities, caregiver burden, and psychological distress among partners of patients with heart disease.心脏病患者的伴侣的依恋不安全感、照顾者负担和心理困扰。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 19;17(9):e0269366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269366. eCollection 2022.
8
Intimate Relationships and Coronary Heart Disease: Implications for Risk, Prevention, and Patient Management.亲密关系与冠心病:风险、预防及患者管理的意义。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):761-774. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01695-4. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
The Healing Hearts Together Randomized Controlled Trial and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Tutorial for Transitioning From an In-Person to a Web-Based Intervention.《Healing Hearts Together 随机对照试验和 COVID-19 大流行:从线下干预到线上干预的过渡教程》。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 6;23(4):e25502. doi: 10.2196/25502.