Escola Superior de Saúde, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.
Escola Superior de Saúde, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
Physical activity, muscle fatigue or age have been suggested as factors that positively or negatively influence the knee joint position sense (KJPS). However, conflicting results about the influence of sports practice, limb dominance and gender are found in the literature. This study aimed to assess the influence of sports practice, limb dominance and gender on the KJPS of soccer players and untrained individuals.
Sixty subjects participated in this study: 29 soccer players (SPs) and 31 untrained participants (UPs). KJPS was tested in a seated position, for the target angles of 20° and 45° of knee flexion, through an open kinetic chain technique and active repositioning method. Intergroup analysis was performed to compare KJPS between SPs and UPs and between gender, and intragroup analysis was performed to compare proprioceptive acuity between dominant and non-dominant limbs.
Knee repositioning errors were lower in SPs than in the UPs. Repositioning errors of the dominant and non-dominant limb were not significantly different in SPs (P > 0.05), but in UPs the dominant limb showed significantly lower repositioning errors, both for 20° (P = 0.046) and 45° target (P = 0.036). There were no gender differences in the KJPS in both groups (P > 0.05).
Proprioceptive acuity is higher in trained than in untrained participants. Dominance seems not to influence KJPS of SPs, but in UPs the dominant limb showed a higher accuracy. There were no differences in KJPS related to gender. These results suggest that sports practice, but neither gender nor limb dominance, may positively influence proprioceptive acuity.
体力活动、肌肉疲劳或年龄被认为是积极或消极影响膝关节位置感(KJPS)的因素。然而,文献中关于运动实践、肢体优势和性别对 KJPS 的影响存在相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在评估运动实践、肢体优势和性别对足球运动员和非训练个体 KJPS 的影响。
共有 60 名受试者参加了这项研究:29 名足球运动员(SP)和 31 名非训练参与者(UP)。通过开放式动力链技术和主动重定位方法,在坐姿下测试 KJPS,目标膝关节屈曲角度为 20°和 45°。进行组间分析比较 SP 和 UP 之间以及性别之间的 KJPS,进行组内分析比较优势和非优势肢体之间的本体感觉敏锐度。
SP 的膝关节重定位误差低于 UP。SP 中优势和非优势肢体的重定位误差无显著性差异(P>0.05),但在 UP 中,优势肢体的重定位误差明显较低,在 20°(P=0.046)和 45°目标(P=0.036)时均如此。两组中 KJPS 均无性别差异(P>0.05)。
训练有素的参与者的本体感觉敏锐度高于未经训练的参与者。优势似乎不会影响 SP 的 KJPS,但在 UP 中,优势肢体的准确性更高。性别与 KJPS 无差异。这些结果表明,运动实践可能会积极影响本体感觉敏锐度,而性别或肢体优势则不会。