Speckmann Felix, Unkelbach Christian
Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931, Köln, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):843-862. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
When people answer the question "How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?", they usually respond with "two," although Moses does not appear in the biblical story of the Ark. We investigated this "Moses illusion" in a multiple-choice format and tested the influence of monetary incentives on the illusion's strength. Thereby, we addressed the role of a cooperative communication context for the illusion's emergence, as well as the role of participants' motivation. In four experiments (total N = 914), we found that the Moses illusion persists in a multiple-choice format. As the multiple-choice format realizes a cooperative context in which the correct answer is always available, we exclude a cooperative context explanation for the illusion. Monetary incentives reduced the strength of the illusion. However, the reduction was numerically and statistically small. We thereby show that the illusion is not due to violations of cooperative communications, and not due to a lack of motivation. The multiple-choice approach will facilitate further research on the Moses illusion and the data provide additional evidence for the Moses illusion's empirical robustness and constrain its theoretical explanations.
当人们回答“摩西带了每种动物各多少只上方舟?”这个问题时,他们通常会回答“两只”,尽管摩西并未出现在方舟的圣经故事中。我们以多项选择题的形式研究了这种“摩西错觉”,并测试了金钱激励对错觉强度的影响。借此,我们探讨了合作交流背景对错觉产生的作用,以及参与者动机的作用。在四项实验(总样本量N = 914)中,我们发现摩西错觉在多项选择题形式中依然存在。由于多项选择题形式营造了一种总能找到正确答案的合作背景,我们排除了用合作背景来解释错觉的可能性。金钱激励降低了错觉的强度。然而,这种降低在数值上和统计上都很小。由此我们表明,这种错觉并非源于违反合作交流原则,也不是由于缺乏动机。多项选择题方法将有助于对方舟错觉进行进一步研究,而这些数据为摩西错觉的实证稳健性提供了额外证据,并限制了其理论解释。