Suppr超能文献

摩西、金钱与多项选择题:高激励下多项选择题格式中的摩西错觉。

Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives.

作者信息

Speckmann Felix, Unkelbach Christian

机构信息

Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Straße 2, 50931, Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):843-862. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Abstract

When people answer the question "How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the Ark?", they usually respond with "two," although Moses does not appear in the biblical story of the Ark. We investigated this "Moses illusion" in a multiple-choice format and tested the influence of monetary incentives on the illusion's strength. Thereby, we addressed the role of a cooperative communication context for the illusion's emergence, as well as the role of participants' motivation. In four experiments (total N = 914), we found that the Moses illusion persists in a multiple-choice format. As the multiple-choice format realizes a cooperative context in which the correct answer is always available, we exclude a cooperative context explanation for the illusion. Monetary incentives reduced the strength of the illusion. However, the reduction was numerically and statistically small. We thereby show that the illusion is not due to violations of cooperative communications, and not due to a lack of motivation. The multiple-choice approach will facilitate further research on the Moses illusion and the data provide additional evidence for the Moses illusion's empirical robustness and constrain its theoretical explanations.

摘要

当人们回答“摩西带了每种动物各多少只上方舟?”这个问题时,他们通常会回答“两只”,尽管摩西并未出现在方舟的圣经故事中。我们以多项选择题的形式研究了这种“摩西错觉”,并测试了金钱激励对错觉强度的影响。借此,我们探讨了合作交流背景对错觉产生的作用,以及参与者动机的作用。在四项实验(总样本量N = 914)中,我们发现摩西错觉在多项选择题形式中依然存在。由于多项选择题形式营造了一种总能找到正确答案的合作背景,我们排除了用合作背景来解释错觉的可能性。金钱激励降低了错觉的强度。然而,这种降低在数值上和统计上都很小。由此我们表明,这种错觉并非源于违反合作交流原则,也不是由于缺乏动机。多项选择题方法将有助于对方舟错觉进行进一步研究,而这些数据为摩西错觉的实证稳健性提供了额外证据,并限制了其理论解释。

相似文献

1
Moses, money, and multiple-choice: The Moses illusion in a multiple-choice format with high incentives.
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):843-862. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01128-z. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Ageing and the Moses illusion: older adults fall for Moses but if asked directly, stick with Noah.
Memory. 2014;22(5):481-92. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.799701. Epub 2013 May 24.
3
Here's looking at you: Visual similarity exacerbates the Moses illusion for semantically similar celebrities.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):75-90. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000144. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
Benzodiazepines and semantic memory: effects of lorazepam on the Moses illusion.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Mar;172(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1665-x. Epub 2003 Nov 28.
7
Susceptibility to illusions and cognitive style: implications for pharmacy dispensing.
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Dec;95(3 Pt 2):1063-86. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.3f.1063.
8
Partial matching in the Moses illusion: response bias not sensitivity.
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):687-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03201094.
9
The contribution of fronto-parietal regions to sentence comprehension: insights from the Moses illusion.
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.052. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
10
The mirror illusion's effects on body state estimation.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb-Mar;33(1-2):102-11. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1187591. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Monetary incentives do not reduce the repetition-induced truth effect.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):1045-1052. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02046-0. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验