Focosi Daniele, Maggi Fabrizio, Mazzetti Paola, Pistello Mauro
North-Western Tuscany Blood Bank, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Division of Virology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Mar;31(2):e2170. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2170. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Viral neutralization tests (VNTs) have long been considered old-fashioned tricks in the armamentarium of fundamental virology, with laboratory implementation for a limited array of viruses only. Nevertheless, they represent the most reliable surrogate of potency for passive immunotherapies, such as monoclonal or polyclonal antibody therapy. The recent interest around therapy with convalescent plasma or monoclonal antibodies for the Covid-19 pandemic has paralleled the revival of VNTs. We review here the available methods by dissecting variations for each fundamental component of the VNT (i.e., virus type and dose, replication-competent cell line, serum, and detection system).
病毒中和试验(VNTs)长期以来一直被视为基础病毒学手段中的老式方法,仅在实验室针对有限种类的病毒进行操作。然而,它们是被动免疫疗法(如单克隆或多克隆抗体疗法)效力最可靠的替代指标。近期,针对新冠疫情采用康复期血浆或单克隆抗体进行治疗引发的关注,与病毒中和试验的复兴同步。我们在此通过剖析病毒中和试验每个基本组成部分(即病毒类型和剂量、具有复制能力的细胞系、血清和检测系统)的差异,回顾现有的方法。