• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种改良的、可行的、安全的技术,具有更好的美容效果。

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions: an improved, feasible and safe technique with superior cosmetic outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Dec;48(12):300060520980589. doi: 10.1177/0300060520980589.

DOI:10.1177/0300060520980589
PMID:33351703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7758570/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) is usually performed with four incisions. Minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder disease with less pain and smaller scars has become increasingly popular. This study reported a new, two-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TILC) using conventional instruments.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 43 patients were recruited to undergo TILC and were compared with 43 historical cases undergoing CLC. We evaluated operative time, postoperative pain, cosmesis and complications.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, bile duct damage, blood loss and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. The mean operation time was longer with TILC than with CLC, but the difference was not statistically different. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower with TILC than with CLC. The mean cosmetic satisfaction score was significantly higher with TILC than that with CLC. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our work demonstrates that TILC generates less postoperative pain and significantly improved cosmesis for patients. TILC is a safe and feasible alternative to CLC.

摘要

目的

传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)通常需要进行四个切口。微创治疗胆囊疾病,减少疼痛和更小的疤痕,已变得越来越受欢迎。本研究报道了一种新的、使用传统器械的两切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TILC)。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,招募了 43 名患者进行 TILC,并与 43 名接受 CLC 的历史病例进行了比较。我们评估了手术时间、术后疼痛、美容效果和并发症。

结果

两组间的性别、年龄、体重指数、胆管损伤、出血量和术后住院时间无显著差异。TILC 的平均手术时间长于 CLC,但差异无统计学意义。TILC 的术后疼痛评分明显低于 CLC。TILC 的美容满意度评分明显高于 CLC。两组并发症的发生率无显著差异。

结论

我们的工作表明,TILC 术后疼痛减轻,美容效果显著改善。TILC 是 CLC 的一种安全可行的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd0/7758570/0ded691a55d2/10.1177_0300060520980589-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd0/7758570/0ded691a55d2/10.1177_0300060520980589-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd0/7758570/0ded691a55d2/10.1177_0300060520980589-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two incisions: an improved, feasible and safe technique with superior cosmetic outcomes.两切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种改良的、可行的、安全的技术,具有更好的美容效果。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Dec;48(12):300060520980589. doi: 10.1177/0300060520980589.
2
A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验比较隐匿性瘢痕切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经典三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1131-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3289-5. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
3
Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):235-43. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828b8b4e.
4
Comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of quality of life, body image, and cosmesis.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术在生活质量、身体形象和美容效果方面的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Apr;22(4):521-526. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_218_18.
5
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term operative outcomes.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机临床试验:短期手术结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Oct;21(5):311-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd.
6
Two-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Reducing Scars in a Simple Way.两切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:以简单方式减少疤痕。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):7-12. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0163. Epub 2017 May 17.
7
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis.单纯性胆囊疾病患者单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的Meta分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Dec;22(6):487-97. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a.
8
Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的短期疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):3089-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4601-3. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
A prospective controlled trial comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control.一项比较单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性对照试验:损伤控制前需谨慎。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Jun;22(3):220-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824e53db.
10
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Biliary Surgery.机器人胆道手术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):283-302. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4315-4329. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07198-8. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2015 Mar 4;5(1):5-7. doi: 10.1002/cld.431. eCollection 2015 Jan.
4
Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的长期切口疝发生率明显高于标准三孔腹腔镜:一项队列研究。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1205-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床效果比较。
Can J Surg. 2019 Feb 1;62(1):52-56. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000118.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与不良事件增加相关:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Sep;32(9):3739-3753. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6143-y. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with two mini cosmetic incisions.采用两个微小美观切口的腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Updates Surg. 2018 Mar;70(1):73-76. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0504-2. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Minimally invasive surgical approach for radicalization of incidental post-cholecystectomy gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility and outcomes.微创外科手术治疗胆囊切除术后意外胆囊癌根治术:安全性、可行性及疗效
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018 Aug;27(4):217-220. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1410489. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
9
Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy is associated with a high rate of trocar-site infection.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与很高的套管部位感染率相关。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Dec;13(4). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1856. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Two-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children.儿童双切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Mar;27(3):306-310. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0221. Epub 2017 Jan 13.