From the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Booth, Ono, Gonzalez).
The Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Taggart).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Oct 1;145(10):1289-1296. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0591-RA.
CONTEXT.—: During the past 3 decades, numerous articles in the literature have offered terminology, diagnostic criteria, and consensus recommendations regarding the entity currently referred to by the World Health Organization as sessile serrated lesion. Given the many names and various, variably reproducible diagnostic criteria ascribed to sessile serrated lesion, confusion persists for many pathologists and gastroenterologists regarding the diagnosis. This distinction is important, as sessile serrated lesion can progress to malignancy, unlike its main differential diagnosis, hyperplastic polyp. Research studies have shed light on the characteristic architecture and morphology, immunohistochemical patterns, and molecular alterations of sessile serrated lesion, and multiple consensus meetings around the globe have developed their criteria and nomenclature, often clashing or mixing terms.
OBJECTIVE.—: To provide a narrative review from the entity's early description to our current understanding.
DATA SOURCES.—: The existing scientific and clinical literature, published texts, medical society recommendations, and specialty consensus guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS.—: The current World Health Organization criteria are a distillation of this scientific process, but terminology is still a point of contention worldwide.
在过去的 30 年中,文献中有许多文章提供了有关目前世界卫生组织称为无蒂锯齿状病变的术语、诊断标准和共识建议。鉴于无蒂锯齿状病变有许多名称和各种不同的、可重复的诊断标准,许多病理学家和胃肠病学家对其诊断仍然存在困惑。这种区别很重要,因为无蒂锯齿状病变可以进展为恶性肿瘤,而不同于其主要鉴别诊断增生性息肉。研究表明,无蒂锯齿状病变具有特征性的结构和形态、免疫组织化学模式以及分子改变,全球多次共识会议制定了其标准和命名法,这些术语经常相互冲突或混合。
从无蒂锯齿状病变的早期描述到我们目前的认识,提供一个叙述性的综述。
现有的科学和临床文献、出版文本、医学协会建议和专业共识指南。
目前的世界卫生组织标准是这一科学过程的提炼,但术语仍然是全世界争论的焦点。