Suppr超能文献

2019 年乳腺细针抽吸术实践:美国病理学家学会全国调查结果。

Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Practice in 2019: Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey.

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus (Li).

Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;145(7):825-833. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0408-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: The College of American Pathologists surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice for laboratories.

OBJECTIVE.—: To investigate breast fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2019.

DESIGN.—: We analyzed data from the College of American Pathologists Breast FNA Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2019 College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytopathology Education Program.

RESULTS.—: Sixty-one percent (499 of 816) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated breast FNAs. Cystic lesions were the most common indication, and radiologists primarily performed FNAs in most settings. Forty-five percent (220 of 491) of laboratories performed ancillary studies on breast FNA samples, but 33.8% (70 of 207) did not report fixation time for breast biomarker studies. Only 54.5% (271 of 497) of laboratories had a standardized reporting system and only 16.8% (82 of 488) were aware of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Breast FNA Biopsy Cytology Reporting System. There were significant differences among different types of institutions in several aspects of breast FNA practice, including frequency of concurrent FNA and core needle biopsy for the same lesion, primary personnel who performed the FNA, etc. Significant differences existed between domestic and international laboratories in slide preparation, ancillary studies, fixation time reporting, standardized/descriptive diagnosis, and International Academy of Cytology Yokohama Reporting System awareness.

CONCLUSIONS.—: This is the first survey from the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee to investigate breast FNA practices. The data reveal significant differences in breast FNA practice among different types of institutions and between domestic and international laboratories, and provide a baseline for future breast FNA studies in a variety of practice settings.

摘要

背景

美国病理学家学院的调查为实验室提供了病理学实践的国家基准。

目的

调查 2019 年国内外实验室的乳腺细针抽吸(FNA)活检实践。

设计

我们分析了参加 2019 年美国病理学家学院非妇科细胞学教育计划的实验室参与的美国病理学家学院乳腺 FNA 实践补充问卷的数据。

结果

61%(816 个中的 499 个)的应答实验室常规评估乳腺 FNA。囊性病变是最常见的指征,大多数情况下放射科医生主要进行 FNA。45%(220/491)的实验室对乳腺 FNA 样本进行辅助研究,但 33.8%(70/207)未报告乳腺生物标志物研究的固定时间。只有 54.5%(497 个中的 271 个)的实验室有标准化报告系统,只有 16.8%(488 个中的 82 个)了解国际细胞学协会横滨乳腺 FNA 活检细胞学报告系统。在乳腺 FNA 实践的几个方面,不同类型的机构之间存在显著差异,包括同一病变同时进行 FNA 和核心针活检的频率、进行 FNA 的主要人员等。国内外实验室在切片制备、辅助研究、固定时间报告、标准化/描述性诊断和国际细胞学协会横滨报告系统意识方面存在显著差异。

结论

这是美国病理学家学院细胞病理学委员会首次调查乳腺 FNA 实践。这些数据显示,不同类型的机构和国内外实验室的乳腺 FNA 实践存在显著差异,为各种实践环境中的未来乳腺 FNA 研究提供了基线。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验