新辅助放化疗后食管腺癌淋巴结反应的重要性。
Importance of Lymph Node Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
机构信息
Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CROMETA), Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Imaging & Pathology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
出版信息
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Dec;112(6):1847-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.074. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
BACKGROUND
Tumor response and lymph node involvement are the most important prognosticators in resected patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We hypothesize that lymph node response (LNR) is also a valuable prognosticator in these patients, potentially revealing the added effect of nCRT.
METHODS
Hematoxylin and eosin slides of 193 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with clinical suspicion of lymph node involvement (cN+) and treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2015 were assessed. Lymph nodes containing viable tumor cells were considered ypN+, and those negative for viable tumor were ypN0. LNR was also described according to an earlier defined method. Three groups were obtained: ypN0/LNR-, ypN0/LNR+, and ypN+. They were compared with 188 cN+ patients being pN0 (n = 45) or pN+ (n = 143) after upfront esophageal resection.
RESULTS
Forty-four patients were ypN0/LNR-, 55 were ypN0/LNR+, and 94 were ypN+. Median overall survival was 96.4, 31.2, and 20.6 months, respectively, and was significantly different between ypN0/LNR- and ypN0/LNR+ groups (P = .020). Survival was comparable between ypN0/LNR- and pN0 (104.2 months) groups (P = .519) and between ypN+ and pN+ (21.6 months) groups (P = .966). In ypN0 patients, risk of death in LNR+ patients was tripled compared with LNR- patients.
CONCLUSIONS
In cN+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with nCRT with postoperative final pathology being ypN0, median overall survival is tripled when no signs of LNR were found and comparable to cN+/pN0 upfront esophagectomy patients, suggesting that 23% of patients treated with nCRT were in fact true N0 and overtreated by nCRT. ypN+ patients have no survival benefit compared with pN+ patients.
背景
新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后,肿瘤反应和淋巴结受累是可切除食管腺癌患者最重要的预后因素。我们假设淋巴结反应(LNR)也是这些患者有价值的预后因素,可能揭示了 nCRT 的附加作用。
方法
评估了 193 例临床怀疑淋巴结受累(cN+)并于 2008 年至 2015 年间接受 nCRT 治疗的食管腺癌患者的苏木精和伊红染色切片。含有存活肿瘤细胞的淋巴结被认为是 ypN+,无存活肿瘤的淋巴结被认为是 ypN0。根据先前定义的方法,还描述了 LNR。获得了三组:ypN0/LNR-、ypN0/LNR+和 ypN+。将其与 188 例直接行食管切除术的 cN+患者 pN0(n=45)或 pN+(n=143)进行比较。
结果
44 例患者为 ypN0/LNR-,55 例为 ypN0/LNR+,94 例为 ypN+。中位总生存期分别为 96.4、31.2 和 20.6 个月,ypN0/LNR-和 ypN0/LNR+组之间差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。ypN0/LNR-与 pN0(104.2 个月)组之间的生存情况无差异(P=0.519),ypN+与 pN+(21.6 个月)组之间的生存情况无差异(P=0.966)。在 ypN0 患者中,LNR+患者的死亡风险是 LNR-患者的三倍。
结论
在接受 nCRT 治疗且术后最终病理为 ypN0 的 cN+食管腺癌患者中,当未发现 LNR 迹象时,中位总生存期增加了两倍,与直接接受 nCRT 治疗的 cN+/pN0 食管切除术患者相当,提示 23%接受 nCRT 治疗的患者实际上是真正的 N0,过度接受了 nCRT 治疗。与 pN+患者相比,ypN+患者无生存获益。