Bannister James, Neve Mia, Kolanko Celeste
Liberum Independent Medical Education, London, UK.
J Eur CME. 2020 Oct 20;9(1):1834761. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1834761.
The quality of continuing medical education (CME) is frequently measured using the Moore's Level of Outcome framework, with higher-level outcomes (5 and above) perceived as more valuable than lower-level outcomes (such as Level 3 - knowledge). Higher-level outcomes require more rigorous evaluation, increasing the time requirements of an interaction; however, there is a trend among adult learners towards a preference for shorter, more informal education such as microlearning. This allows for greater reach but prevents outcome evaluation to higher levels. We explored the utility of combining microlearning with more traditional eLearning formats ("microlearning programme") to increase participation while retaining the ability to measure knowledge- and competence-level outcomes. Comparing two recent programmes with similar content run previously ("comparator programmes"), we identified a slight improvement in completion of evaluation activities associated with the microlearning programme. However, the significant reach microlearning affords presents a clear need to bridge the gap between participation and evaluation. Considering these two cases, we concluded that future microlearning initiatives should incorporate evaluation at the point of education, providing a combination of microlearning and microevaluation to drive knowledge gain in a form that is measurable in terms of educational outcomes.
继续医学教育(CME)的质量通常使用摩尔结果水平框架来衡量,较高水平的结果(5级及以上)被认为比较低水平的结果(如3级——知识)更有价值。较高水平的结果需要更严格的评估,这增加了互动所需的时间;然而,成年学习者有一种倾向,更喜欢更短、更非正式的教育方式,如微学习。这使得覆盖面更广,但阻碍了对更高水平结果的评估。我们探讨了将微学习与更传统的电子学习形式(“微学习计划”)相结合的效用,以提高参与度,同时保留衡量知识和能力水平结果的能力。通过比较两个之前运行的内容相似的近期项目(“对照项目”),我们发现与微学习计划相关的评估活动的完成情况略有改善。然而,微学习所带来的显著覆盖面显然需要弥合参与度和评估之间的差距。考虑到这两个案例,我们得出结论,未来的微学习倡议应在教育过程中纳入评估,提供微学习和微评估的结合,以推动知识的获取,其形式应能根据教育成果进行衡量。