Suppr超能文献

评估继续医学教育在跨学科团队中的影响:一种新颖的、有针对性的方法。

Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Medical Education in the Interdisciplinary Team: A Novel, Targeted Approach.

作者信息

Jenkins Billy, Lester Katrina, Nobel Alex, Such Helen, Yawn Barbara, Scott Alison

机构信息

Touch Independent Medical Education Ltd, Cheshire, UK.

Department of Family and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mn, USA.

出版信息

J CME. 2023 Jan 15;12(1):2161730. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2022.2161730. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

In order to maximise the learning potential of medical education programmes aimed at interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary teams, it is important to understand how the effectiveness of these programmes can vary between healthcare professionals from different specialities. Measuring the impact of educational activities between specialities may facilitate the development of future interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary education programmes, yielding enhanced learner outcomes and, ultimately, improving outcomes for patients. In this analysis, we report on a new approach to measuring change in knowledge and competence among learners from different physician specialities. We did this by tailoring post-activity competency assessments to three specialities - primary care physicians, pulmonologists and immunologists caring for patients with severe asthma. Our findings revealed that primary care physicians had markedly improved knowledge, measured using assessment questions, compared with the other specialities after completing the activity. We also report on differences between these specialities in intention to change clinical practice, confidence in clinical practice, and remaining educational gaps. Understanding how different members of the interdisciplinary team have benefited from an educational activity is essential for designing future educational activities and targeting resources.

摘要

为了最大限度地发挥针对跨学科或多学科团队的医学教育项目的学习潜力,了解这些项目的有效性在不同专业的医疗保健专业人员之间如何变化非常重要。衡量不同专业之间教育活动的影响可能有助于未来跨学科和多学科教育项目的发展,产生更好的学习者成果,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。在本分析中,我们报告了一种衡量来自不同内科专业的学习者知识和能力变化的新方法。我们通过为三个专业——初级保健医生、肺病学家和治疗重度哮喘患者的免疫学家量身定制活动后的能力评估来做到这一点。我们的研究结果显示,在完成活动后,与其他专业相比,初级保健医生使用评估问题衡量的知识有显著提高。我们还报告了这些专业在改变临床实践的意愿、临床实践的信心以及剩余教育差距方面的差异。了解跨学科团队的不同成员如何从教育活动中受益对于设计未来的教育活动和分配资源至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dc6/10031772/a1c8fe1f8f9c/ZJEC_A_2161730_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验