• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低收入和中等收入国家隐静脉桥行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结局

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts in a Low to Middle-Income Country.

作者信息

Adnan Ghufran, Ahmed Intisar, Tai Javed, Khan Maria Ali, Hasan Hammad

机构信息

Cardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):e11496. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11496.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.11496
PMID:33354442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7744211/
Abstract

Background Revascularization of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) is challenging and debated for the last few decades. The percutaneous revascularization of SVGs was reported to have poorer long-term outcomes than native coronary artery revascularization. Purpose We aim to study the peri-procedural complications and long-term outcomes of the percutaneous revascularization of SVGs in a low-middle-income country. Methods In this retrospective study, we included 110 patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization from January 2011 to March 2020 and followed them retrospectively for long-term outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events. Results The mean age was 71 ±9, and 81% were male. The most common reason for the presentation was non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (46%). The mean follow-up period of the study was 48±27 months. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (86%). A drug-eluting stent (80%) was placed in most of the patients, followed by a bare-metal stent (BMS) (14%) and percutaneous balloon angioplasty (POBA) (6%). We did not find any significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (P=0.48), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (p=0.69), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p=0.54) with drug-eluting stent (DES) as compared to either BMS or POBA. The mean period from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to SVG percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was 15± 5.5 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event, stroke, and female sex were independently associated with MACE. Conclusion The long-term outcomes of SVG PCI are not affected by the types of stents. Female gender, ACS, and stroke are the independent predictors of MACE after SVG PCI, and statin therapy has a positive impact on the long-term outcomes of SVG PCI.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,隐静脉移植血管(SVG)的血管重建具有挑战性且存在争议。据报道,SVG的经皮血管重建的长期效果比天然冠状动脉血管重建的效果更差。目的:我们旨在研究在低收入和中等收入国家中SVG经皮血管重建的围手术期并发症和长期效果。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了2011年1月至2020年3月期间接受经皮血管重建的110例患者,并对他们进行长期效果和主要不良心血管事件的回顾性随访。结果:平均年龄为71±9岁,男性占81%。就诊的最常见原因是非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)(46%)。研究的平均随访期为48±27个月。最常见的合并症是高血压(86%)。大多数患者(80%)植入了药物洗脱支架,其次是裸金属支架(BMS)(14%)和经皮球囊血管成形术(POBA)(6%)。与BMS或POBA相比,我们发现使用药物洗脱支架(DES)在主要不良心脏事件(MACE)(P=0.48)、靶血管重建(TVR)(P=0.69)和靶病变血管重建(TLR)(P=0.54)方面没有显著差异。从冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)到SVG经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的平均时间为15±5.5年。多变量Cox回归分析表明,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)事件、中风和女性性别与MACE独立相关。结论:SVG PCI的长期效果不受支架类型的影响。女性性别、ACS和中风是SVG PCI后MACE的独立预测因素,他汀类药物治疗对SVG PCI的长期效果有积极影响。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts in a Low to Middle-Income Country.低收入和中等收入国家隐静脉桥行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结局
Cureus. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):e11496. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11496.
2
Drug eluting versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;19(7 Pt B):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.大隐静脉移植血管介入治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较:随机试验的最新综合荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein bypass graft percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the Veterans Affairs CART program.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在隐静脉旁路移植经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的安全性和有效性:来自退伍军人事务 CART 计划的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 28;64(17):1825-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1207. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
5
Long-term outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗隐静脉桥病变的长期预后:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):1035-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25279. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
6
Beneficial 2-years results of drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft lesions.药物洗脱支架治疗隐静脉桥病变的两年有益结果。
EuroIntervention. 2008 May;4(1):108-14. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i1a18.
7
Drug-eluting stenting is superior to bare metal stenting in saphenous vein grafts.在隐静脉移植血管中,药物洗脱支架置入术优于裸金属支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Dec;66(4):507-11. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20498.
8
The short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stent vs bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft disease: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架经皮介入治疗隐静脉移植血管病变的短期和长期疗效:所有随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 May;41(5):685-692. doi: 10.1002/clc.22908. Epub 2018 May 11.
9
Continued benefit from paclitaxel-eluting compared with bare-metal stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions during long-term follow-up of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial.在 SOS(静脉桥血管支架置入术)试验的长期随访中,紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架置入相比,在静脉桥病变中持续获益。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.003.
10
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous interventions in saphenous vein grafts using drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents: a comprehensive meta-analysisof all randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架经皮介入治疗静脉桥的临床结局:所有随机临床试验的综合荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2012 May;35(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.21984. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on saphenous vein grafts.隐静脉搭桥血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期和长期临床结果
ARYA Atheroscler. 2024;20(3):7-11. doi: 10.48305/arya.2024.41338.2867.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery bypass in treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗非ST段抬高急性综合征的系统评价和荟萃分析研究
Eur J Transl Myol. 2025 Mar 31;35(1). doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12930. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in grafts and native vessels in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病冠状动脉旁路移植术患者移植血管和自身血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Nov;11(11):4798-4806. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.33.
2
Mortality From Ischemic Heart Disease.缺血性心脏病导致的死亡率
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jun;12(6):e005375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005375. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
Current State of the Art in Approaches to Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions.
大隐静脉移植血管干预方法的当前技术水平
Interv Cardiol. 2017 Sep;12(2):85-91. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:4:2.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的隐静脉桥。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004953.
5
Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents With Bare-Metal Stents for PCI of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):E139-E169. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Angiographic Findings and Revascularization Success in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting.急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉搭桥术患者的血管造影结果与血管重建成功率
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):473-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.040. Epub 2016 May 28.
7
Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy.常规手动血栓切除术与否的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1389-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415098. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV.冠状动脉旁路移植手术后大隐静脉桥失败:来自 PREVENT IV 的研究结果。
Circulation. 2014 Oct 21;130(17):1445-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008193. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
9
Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions.冠状动脉旁路移植术后大隐静脉桥失败:病理生理学、处理方法和未来方向。
Ann Surg. 2013 May;257(5):824-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c38d.
10
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及心血管造影和介入学会的报告
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 15;79(3):453-95. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23438.