• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉搭桥术患者的血管造影结果与血管重建成功率

Angiographic Findings and Revascularization Success in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting.

作者信息

Blachutzik Florian, Achenbach Stephan, Troebs Monique, Roether Jens, Nef Holger, Hamm Christian, Schlundt Christian

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):473-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.040. Epub 2016 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.040
PMID:27328951
Abstract

Current guidelines recommend invasive coronary angiography and interventional revascularization in ST-elevation and Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). The aim of this study was to analyze culprit lesions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) success in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We analyzed the data of 121 consecutive patients in whom coronary angiography was performed in the setting of STEMI or NSTEMI and who had previous CABG. Coronary angiograms were reviewed, and clinical data were evaluated. The culprit vessel was identified by means of electrocardiographic findings, echocardiography, and coronary angiography. A bypass graft was the culprit vessel in 86% of patients with STEMI and 68% of patients with NSTEMI. Venous grafts were culprit vessels significantly more frequently than arterial grafts (81 of 260 venous grafts vs 4 of 65 arterial grafts, p <0.001). Attempted acute PCI was successful in 97% of native arteries (31 of 32 patients) but only in 81% of bypass grafts (68 of 84 patients, p = 0.031). Overall in-hospital mortality was 13% (STEMI: 25%, NSTEMI: 10%, p <0.001) and was significantly higher after failed acute PCI (6 of 11 patients; 55%) compared with successful acute PCI (7 of 110 patients; 6%; p = 0.006). In conclusion, the culprit lesion in patients with previous CABG who present with STEMI or NSTEMI is more often located in bypass grafts than in native arteries. Successful PCI is more likely in native arteries compared with bypass grafts.

摘要

当前指南推荐对ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI和NSTEMI)患者进行有创冠状动脉造影及介入性血运重建。本研究的目的是分析既往有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的罪犯病变及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)成功率。我们分析了121例连续患者的数据,这些患者在STEMI或NSTEMI情况下接受了冠状动脉造影且既往有CABG。回顾冠状动脉造影图像并评估临床数据。通过心电图表现、超声心动图和冠状动脉造影确定罪犯血管。在STEMI患者中,86%的罪犯血管为旁路移植血管,在NSTEMI患者中为68%。静脉移植血管作为罪犯血管的频率显著高于动脉移植血管(260条静脉移植血管中有81条,65条动脉移植血管中有4条,p<0.001)。97%的自身动脉(32例患者中的31例)急性PCI尝试成功,但旁路移植血管仅81%成功(84例患者中的68例,p = 0.031)。总体住院死亡率为13%(STEMI:25%,NSTEMI:10%,p<0.001),急性PCI失败后的死亡率(11例患者中的6例;55%)显著高于急性PCI成功后的死亡率(110例患者中的7例;6%;p = 0.006)。总之,既往有CABG且发生STEMI或NSTEMI的患者,其罪犯病变更常位于旁路移植血管而非自身动脉。与旁路移植血管相比,自身动脉成功进行PCI的可能性更大。

相似文献

1
Angiographic Findings and Revascularization Success in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting.急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉搭桥术患者的血管造影结果与血管重建成功率
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):473-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.040. Epub 2016 May 28.
2
Twelve-month clinical outcomes of acute non-ST versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with reduced preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前心肌梗死血流溶栓降低的情况下的12个月临床结局。
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Aug;29(5):416-422. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000632.
3
Current characteristics and management of ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the Tokyo metropolitan area: from the Tokyo CCU network registered cohort.东京都地区ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的当前特征与管理:来自东京CCU网络注册队列研究
Heart Vessels. 2016 Nov;31(11):1740-1751. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0791-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting during Hospitalization for ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST 段抬高或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间行冠状动脉旁路移植术的特征和院内转归。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jan 25;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00016. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
5
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Arteries Without Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Cardiogenic Shock.急性冠状动脉综合征无休克患者中行非机械循环支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术治疗原生冠状动脉。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;158:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
6
Prior coronary artery bypass graft patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗的前冠状动脉旁路移植术患者伴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.008.
7
Cardiovascular Risk Profile, Presentation and Management Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性冠状动脉综合征患者的心血管风险特征、临床表现和治疗结局。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101078. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101078. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Outcome after coronary bypass grafting for coronary complications following coronary angiography.冠状动脉造影术后冠状动脉并发症行冠状动脉搭桥术的预后
J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic disease burden between ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Non-culprit Gensini score and non-culprit SYNTAX score.比较 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病负担:罪犯 Gensini 评分和罪犯 SYNTAX 评分。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):238-243. doi: 10.1002/clc.23534. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Literature Overview.急性心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率:文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 12;16(8):e66729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66729. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
A Complex Left Internal Mammary Artery Intervention.复杂的左乳内动脉介入治疗。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 18;15(6):e40593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40593. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Retrograde CTO-PCI Using an Internal Thoracic Bypass Graft Segment in a Patient with Acute Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.
在一名急性下壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中使用胸廓内旁路移植段进行逆向慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Int Med Case Rep J. 2022 Sep 15;15:499-505. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S370231. eCollection 2022.
4
In-hospital outcome of primary PCI for patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass grafting.急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内结局。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1737-1745. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1813.
5
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Saphenous Vein Grafts in a Low to Middle-Income Country.低收入和中等收入国家隐静脉桥行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结局
Cureus. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):e11496. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11496.
6
Stable Hemodynamics within "No-Touch" Saphenous Vein Graft.“非接触式”大隐静脉移植物内的稳定血流动力学
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 20;26(2):88-94. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.19-00156. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Current State of the Art in Approaches to Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions.大隐静脉移植血管干预方法的当前技术水平
Interv Cardiol. 2017 Sep;12(2):85-91. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:4:2.
8
Increased Contractile Function of Human Saphenous Vein Grafts Harvested by "No-Touch" Technique.采用“非接触”技术获取的人隐静脉移植物收缩功能增强。
Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 12;8:1135. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01135. eCollection 2017.