Blonna Davide, Olivero Alberto, Galletta Claudia, Greco Valentina, Castoldi Filippo, Fracassi Matteo, Davico Marco, Rossi Roberto
Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 10;8(12):2325967120967776. doi: 10.1177/2325967120967776. eCollection 2020 Dec.
The effect of the double-incision technique on the supinator muscle is unclear.
The aim of this study was to quantify fatty atrophy of the supinator muscle and map the area of muscle damage.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
A total of 19 male patients (median age, 43 years) who underwent distal biceps tendon repair were included in the analysis. Patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. The following variables were analyzed: range of motion; shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score; Summary Outcome Determination (SOD) score; and isokinetic peak force and endurance in supination. Quantitative analysis and mapping of fatty infiltration of the supinator muscle were based on the calculation of proton density fat fraction on magnetic resonance imaging scans of both elbows using the IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Echoes of Asymmetrical Length) sequence.
At an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 12-64 months), the median SOD score was 9.0 (95% CI, 7.8-9.4), and the mean QuickDASH score was 6.7 (95% CI, 0.0-14.1). A difference of 17% in peak torque was measured between repaired and nonrepaired elbows (repaired elbow: 9.7 N·m; nonrepaired elbow: 11.7 N·m; = .11). Endurance was better in the repaired elbow than the nonrepaired elbow (8.4% vs 14.9% work fatigue, respectively; = .02). The average fat fraction of the supinator muscle was 19% (95% CI, 16%-21%) in repaired elbows and 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) in contralateral elbows ( = .04). The increase in fat fraction was located in a limited area between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity.
The assessment of the supinator muscle showed a limited increase in fat fraction between the radius and ulna at the level of the bicipital tuberosity. No significant effect on supination strength was highlighted.
双切口技术对旋后肌的影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在量化旋后肌的脂肪萎缩情况并绘制肌肉损伤区域图。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
共纳入19例接受肱二头肌远端肌腱修复的男性患者(中位年龄43岁)进行分析。纳入至少随访12个月的患者。分析以下变量:活动范围;手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍简化版(QuickDASH)评分;综合结果判定(SOD)评分;以及旋后时的等速峰值力和耐力。基于使用IDEAL(非对称长度回波迭代分解)序列对双侧肘部进行磁共振成像扫描计算质子密度脂肪分数,对旋后肌的脂肪浸润进行定量分析和绘图。
平均随访24个月(范围12 - 64个月),中位SOD评分为9.0(95%CI,7.8 - 9.4),平均QuickDASH评分为6.7(95%CI,0.0 - 14.1)。修复侧与未修复侧肘部的峰值扭矩差异为17%(修复侧肘部:9.7 N·m;未修复侧肘部:11.7 N·m;P = 0.11)。修复侧肘部的耐力优于未修复侧肘部(工作疲劳分别为8.4%和14.9%;P = 0.02)。修复侧肘部旋后肌的平均脂肪分数为19%(95%CI,16% - 21%),对侧肘部为14%(95%CI,13% - 16%)(P = 0.04)。脂肪分数增加位于肱二头肌结节水平的桡骨和尺骨之间的有限区域。
旋后肌评估显示,在肱二头肌结节水平的桡骨和尺骨之间,脂肪分数有有限增加。未发现对旋后力量有显著影响。