Kenes Michael T, McSparron Jakob I, Marshall Vincent D, Renius Karl, Hyzy Robert C
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Pharmacy, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Dec 16;2(12):e0303. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000303. eCollection 2020 Dec.
To characterize the incidence and characteristics of propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia in coronavirus disease 2019 versus noncoronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Single-center prospective, observational cohort study.
Medical ICU and regional infectious containment unit.
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted from April 7, 2020, to May 15, 2020, requiring continuous propofol administration.
None.
Of 50 patients enrolled, 54% had coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 35.5 (interquartile range, 30.2-41) and 8 (interquartile range, 6-9). Pao/Fio ratio was 130.5 (interquartile range, 94.5-193.8). Patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome experienced a higher rate of hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride ≥ 500 mg/dL) than noncoronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (9 [33.3%] vs 1 [4.3%]; = 0.014). Those with coronavirus disease 2019, compared with those without, received more propofol prior to becoming hypertriglyceridemic (median, 5,436.0 mg [interquartile range, 3,405.5-6,845.5 mg] vs 4,229.0 mg [interquartile range, 2,083.4-4,972.1 mg]; = 0.027). After adjustment for propofol dose with logistic regression (odds ratio, 5.97; 95% CI, 1.16-59.57; = 0.031) and propensity score matching (odds ratio, 8.64; 95% CI, 1.27-149.12; = 0.025), there remained a significant difference in the development of hypertriglyceridemia between coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and noncoronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. There was no difference between groups in time to hypertriglyceridemia ( = 0.063). Serum lipase was not different between those who did or did not develop hypertriglyceridemia ( = 0.545). No patients experienced signs or symptoms of pancreatitis.
Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome experienced a higher rate of propofol-associated hypertriglyceridemia than noncoronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients, even after accounting for differences in propofol administration.
比较2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与非COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中丙泊酚相关高甘油三酯血症的发生率及特征。
单中心前瞻性观察队列研究。
医学重症监护病房和区域传染病隔离病房。
2020年4月7日至2020年5月15日收治的需要持续输注丙泊酚的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。
无。
纳入的50例患者中,54%患有COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的中位数分别为35.5(四分位间距,30.2 - 41)和8(四分位间距,6 - 9)。氧合指数(Pao/Fio)为130.5(四分位间距,94.5 - 193.8)。与非COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者相比,COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者发生高甘油三酯血症(甘油三酯≥500mg/dL)的比例更高(9例[33.3%] vs 1例[4.3%];P = 0.014)。与未发生高甘油三酯血症的患者相比,发生高甘油三酯血症的COVID-19患者在出现高甘油三酯血症之前接受的丙泊酚更多(中位数,5436.0mg[四分位间距,3405.5 - 6845.5mg] vs 4229.0mg[四分位间距,2083.4 - 4972.1mg];P = 0.027)。经逻辑回归调整丙泊酚剂量后(比值比,5.97;95%置信区间,1.16 - 59.57;P = 0.031)以及倾向评分匹配后(比值比,8.64;95%置信区间,1.27 - 149.12;P = 0.025),COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征与非COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者在高甘油三酯血症的发生方面仍存在显著差异。两组患者出现高甘油三酯血症的时间无差异(P = 0.063)。发生或未发生高甘油三酯血症的患者血清脂肪酶水平无差异(P = 0.545)。无患者出现胰腺炎的体征或症状。
即使考虑丙泊酚给药差异,COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者发生丙泊酚相关高甘油三酯血症的比例仍高于非COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。