• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TLIF 融合术的并发症——它们会影响患者的预后吗?一项前瞻性的双中心研究。

Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopaedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Department of Spine Surgery, St. Franziskus-Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1320-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06689-w. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-020-06689-w
PMID:33354744
Abstract

PURPOSE

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for degenerative disk disease. While numerous studies have analyzed complication rates and risk factors this study investigates the extent to which complications after TLIF spondylodesis alter the clinical outcome regarding pain and physical function.

METHODS

A prospective clinical two-center study was conducted, including 157 patients undergoing TLIF spondylodesis with 12-month follow-up (FU). Our study classified complications into three subgroups: none (I), minor (IIa), and major complications (IIb). Complications were considered "major" if revision surgery was required or new permanent physical impairment ensued. Clinical outcome was assessed using visual analog scales for back (VAS-B) and leg pain (VAS-L), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of 157 patients (24.8%) had at least one complication during follow-up. At FU, significant improvement was seen for group I (n = 118) in VAS-B (-50%), VAS-L (-54%), and ODI (-48%) and for group IIa (n = 27) in VAS-B (-40%), VAS-L (-64%), and ODI (-47%). In group IIb (n = 12), VAS-B (-22%, P = 0.089) and ODI (-33%, P = 0.056) improved not significantly, while VAS-L dropped significantly less (-32%, P = 0.013) compared to both other groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that major complications with need of revision surgery after TLIF spondylodesis lead to a significantly worse clinical outcome (VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI) compared to no or minor complications. It is therefore vitally important to raise the surgeon´s awareness of consequences of major complications, and the topic should be given high priority in clinical work.

摘要

目的

经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)是一种广泛应用于治疗退行性椎间盘疾病的手术方法。虽然已有大量研究分析了并发症发生率和危险因素,但本研究旨在探讨 TLIF 融合术后并发症对疼痛和身体功能等临床结果的影响程度。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性的临床双中心研究,共纳入 157 例接受 TLIF 融合术的患者,随访时间为 12 个月。我们将并发症分为三组:无并发症(I 组)、轻微并发症(IIa 组)和严重并发症(IIb 组)。如果需要再次手术或出现新的永久性身体功能障碍,则认为并发症为“严重”。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估背部(VAS-B)和腿部疼痛(VAS-L),采用 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结果。

结果

157 例患者中有 39 例(24.8%)在随访期间至少发生了 1 种并发症。在随访结束时,I 组(n=118)的 VAS-B(-50%)、VAS-L(-54%)和 ODI(-48%)显著改善,IIa 组(n=27)的 VAS-B(-40%)、VAS-L(-64%)和 ODI(-47%)也显著改善。然而,在 IIb 组(n=12)中,VAS-B(-22%,P=0.089)和 ODI(-33%,P=0.056)的改善不显著,而 VAS-L 的下降程度明显低于其他两组(-32%,P=0.013)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,TLIF 融合术后需要再次手术的严重并发症会导致临床结果(VAS-B、VAS-L 和 ODI)明显恶化,与无并发症或轻微并发症相比差异具有统计学意义。因此,提高外科医生对严重并发症后果的认识至关重要,在临床工作中应高度重视这一问题。

相似文献

1
Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.TLIF 融合术的并发症——它们会影响患者的预后吗?一项前瞻性的双中心研究。
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1320-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06689-w. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
3
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
4
Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.在一家三甲医院比较经皮内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的初步临床疗效:经皮内镜术优于微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Revision for Endoscopic Diskectomy: Is Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion an Option?内镜下椎间盘切除术翻修:侧路腰椎椎体间融合术是否可行?
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e26-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.226. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
6
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与腰椎外侧椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):755-770. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0806-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的有效性:一项初步评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):28-33. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17989. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
8
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
9
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
10
The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.影像学融合对微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术后临床结果的影响。
Spine J. 2011 Mar;11(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid cortical bone trajectory and modified cortical bone trajectory techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: A finite element analysis.L4-L5节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中混合皮质骨轨迹和改良皮质骨轨迹技术:有限元分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 20;10(5):e26294. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26294. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
2
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) and mini-incision L5/S1 OLIF with a self-lock cage for the surgical treatment of L5 spondylolisthesis.经皮椎间孔内镜手术(PTES)与微型切口 L5/S1 前路腰椎间融合术(OLIF)联合自锁融合器治疗 L5 滑脱症
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 24;18(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04022-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.了解患者报告结局测量的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;161(4):551-560. doi: 10.1177/0194599819852604. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
2
Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes.对退行性疾病腰椎融合术趋势的批判性分析再探讨:技术对融合率和临床结果的影响
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1868-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5544-x. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Fusion in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for predicting cage subsidence by assessing bone mineral density following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis.
基于 MRI 的椎体骨质量评分通过评估经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后骨密度预测 cage 沉降:一项回顾性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3167-3175. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07854-7. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
4
CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.CT 亨氏单位是微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术螺钉松动或 cage 下沉的可靠参数。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 28;13(1):1620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28555-7.
5
What Preoperative Factors Are Associated With Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?对于退行性腰椎滑脱症,单节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后,哪些术前因素与实现具有临床意义的改善和满意度相关?
Global Spine J. 2024 May;14(4):1287-1295. doi: 10.1177/21925682221139816. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
OLIF versus MI-TLIF for patients with degenerative lumbar disease: Is one procedure superior to the other? A systematic review and meta-analysis.退行性腰椎疾病患者的斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF):一种手术方法是否优于另一种?一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 13;9:1014314. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014314. eCollection 2022.
7
Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age.70 岁以上患者单节段腰椎退变性疾病后路采用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)棒固定和经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)联合钛棒固定。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):2831-2843. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04448-8. Epub 2022 May 5.
8
Traumatic Vertebral Fracture in a Patient With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Rare Complication.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者发生创伤性椎体骨折:一种罕见的并发症。
Cureus. 2021 Oct 24;13(10):e19004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19004. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.同时单节段斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术联合O型臂导航技术下后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4938. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214938.
富血小板血浆在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中促进骨融合的疗效
Asian Spine J. 2018 Feb;12(1):112-118. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.112. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences.成人脊柱畸形手术的并发症:对近期文献的系统回顾,报告了汇总发生率。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(9):2272-2284. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5535-y. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.腰椎椎间融合术后2年内再次手术:一项多中心研究。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1972-1980. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5508-1. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion. 5-10 years long-term Follow-up: results from a RCT.与标准后路器械融合术相比,经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)并未改善治疗效果。5至10年长期随访:一项随机对照试验的结果
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):658-665. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4592-3. Epub 2016 May 7.
7
Vertebral body fracture after TLIF: a new complication.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后椎体骨折:一种新的并发症。
Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25 Suppl 1:230-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4517-1. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一项针对182例患者的前瞻性多中心研究的术后一年发病率、临床及影像学结果
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Oct;101(6 Suppl):S241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
9
Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.微创与开放后路腰椎椎间融合术/经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术在临床改善、融合率及主要并发症发生率方面的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1058-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3890-5. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
10
Surgery in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications, outcomes and complications. A systematic review.腰椎退变性脊柱滑脱症的手术治疗:适应证、疗效和并发症。系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):945-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3144-3. Epub 2014 Jan 9.