• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改进医院药房的无菌转移程序 第 A 部分:安瓿和小瓶表面生物负荷测定方法。

Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part A: methods for the determination of the surface bioburden on ampoules and vials.

机构信息

Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands

Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jan;28(1):38-41. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001672. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001672
PMID:33355282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7788213/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop methods for surface bioburden determination of ampoules and vials to be used in the validation of the disinfection procedures and in routine monitoring of ampoules and vials.

METHODS

The surface bioburdens of ampoules and vials are determined before and after disinfection by contact plates and total immersion.

RESULTS

The mean surface bioburdens of non-disinfected ampoules and vials taken straight from the original boxes are 2.4 and 5.01 cfu (total immersion; n = 20), and 0.97 and 0.94 cfu (contact plates; n = 60). The mean surface bioburdens of ampules and vials after disinfection by wiping are 1.15 and 7.50 cfu (total immersion; n = 20), and 0.12 and 0.10 cfu (contact plates; n = 60). The high number of cfu on vials (total immersion) indicate hidden cfu around the neck not removable by wiping and not detected by contact plates. Total immersion needs special laboratory facilities and is expensive (about €50 a sample). Therefore, it is less appropriate for use in routine monitoring. However, because of the high recovery, it is the method of choice for the validation of the disinfection procedure. Surface bioburden determination by contact plates is relatively simple. Non-flat surfaces cannot be reached, but the recovery from the touched flat part of the surface is high (around 50%). The recovery from swabs is low (around 10%). Another disadvantage of swabs is the laboratory work after sampling. We therefore advise contact plates for routine monitoring. To get a reliable value of the mean surface bioburden at least 30 samples need to be examined.

CONCLUSION

Total immersion is the method of choice for the determination of the effectiveness of a disinfection procedure for ampoules and vials. Contact plate is the method of choice for routine monitoring of the surfaces of ampoules and vials.

摘要

目的

开发安瓿和小瓶表面生物负荷测定方法,用于验证消毒程序,并常规监测安瓿和小瓶。

方法

通过接触平板和全浸法测定消毒前后安瓿和小瓶的表面生物负荷。

结果

直接从原始包装中取出的未消毒安瓿和小瓶的平均表面生物负荷分别为 2.4 和 5.01 cfu(全浸法;n = 20)和 0.97 和 0.94 cfu(接触平板;n = 60)。经擦拭消毒后的安瓿和小瓶的平均表面生物负荷分别为 1.15 和 7.50 cfu(全浸法;n = 20)和 0.12 和 0.10 cfu(接触平板;n = 60)。小瓶(全浸法)上的高 cfu 数表明,颈部周围有无法通过擦拭去除且接触平板无法检测到的隐藏 cfu。全浸法需要特殊的实验室设施且昂贵(每个样本约 50 欧元)。因此,它不太适合常规监测。但是,由于回收率高,它是消毒程序验证的首选方法。接触平板法进行表面生物负荷测定相对简单。无法接触非平面表面,但从接触的平面部分的回收率很高(约 50%)。棉签的回收率较低(约 10%)。棉签的另一个缺点是采样后的实验室工作。因此,我们建议在常规监测中使用接触平板。为了获得可靠的平均表面生物负荷值,至少需要检查 30 个样本。

结论

全浸法是测定安瓿和小瓶消毒程序有效性的首选方法。接触平板法是常规监测安瓿和小瓶表面的首选方法。

相似文献

1
Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part A: methods for the determination of the surface bioburden on ampoules and vials.改进医院药房的无菌转移程序 第 A 部分:安瓿和小瓶表面生物负荷测定方法。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Jan;28(1):38-41. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001672. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies. Part B: evaluation of disinfection methods for materials with a non-sterile surface.改进医院药房的无菌转接程序。B 部分:非无菌表面材料的消毒方法评估。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):271-275. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001673. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
3
Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part C: evaluation and redesign of the transfer process.改进医院药房无菌转配程序 C 部分:转配过程的评估与再设计。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jan;29(1):12-17. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002034. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
4
Microbiological controls of aseptic handling in Dutch hospital pharmacies: Results, limits, and methods for assessing.荷兰医院药房无菌操作的微生物控制:结果、局限性以及评估方法。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2022 Aug 1;175:106228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106228. Epub 2022 May 29.
5
Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part B: risk control.降低医院药房无菌操作非无菌风险,第 B 部分:风险控制。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(6):325-330. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002179. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Microbial bioburden in endoscope reprocessing and an in-use evaluation of the high-level disinfection capabilities of Cidex PA.内窥镜再处理中的微生物生物负荷以及戊二醛(Cidex PA)高水平消毒能力的使用中评估。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(2):63-8. doi: 10.1097/00001610-199903000-00007.
7
Assessment of bioburden on human and animal tissues: part 2--results of testing of human tissue and qualification of a composite sample for routine bioburden determination.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2012 Aug;13(3):431-9. doi: 10.1007/s10561-012-9296-2. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
8
Is Transducer Hygiene sufficient when Vaginal Probes are used in the Clinical Routine?在临床常规操作中使用阴道探头时,换能器卫生是否足够?
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Apr;37(2):137-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-103605. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
9
Impact of pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection on surface contamination in a hospital facility's expressed human milk feed preparation area.脉冲氙紫外线消毒对医院设施中表达人乳喂养准备区表面污染的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2997-9.
10
Assessment of the Overall and Multidrug-Resistant Organism Bioburden on Environmental Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities.医疗机构环境表面总体及耐多药生物体生物负荷评估
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):1426-1432. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.198. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies part C: evaluation and redesign of the transfer process.改进医院药房无菌转配程序 C 部分:转配过程的评估与再设计。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Jan;29(1):12-17. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002034. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Improving the aseptic transfer procedures in hospital pharmacies. Part B: evaluation of disinfection methods for materials with a non-sterile surface.改进医院药房的无菌转接程序。B 部分:非无菌表面材料的消毒方法评估。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):271-275. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001673. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
3
Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part C: applying risk assessment and risk control in practice.降低医院药房无菌操作非无菌风险,第 C 部分:在实践中应用风险评估和风险控制。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 May;30(3):160-166. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002747. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring.不同拭子用于微生物环境监测的回收率评估
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2017;71(1):33-42. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006783. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
2
Comparison of sampling procedures for recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from stainless steel food contact surfaces.比较从不锈钢食品接触面回收单核细胞增生李斯特菌的采样程序。
J Food Prot. 2012 Jun;75(6):1077-82. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-421.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of commercially available contact plates for monitoring microbial environments.评估市售接触碟用于监测微生物环境的有效性。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Mar;48(3):379-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02534.x. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
4
Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.与传统人造纤维拭子相比,高回收率植绒拭子用于表面微生物环境监测的性能鉴定
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2008 May-Jun;62(3):191-9.
5
Fundamentals of an environmental monitoring program. Technical Report No. 13. Revised. Parenteral Drug Association.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Sep-Oct;55(5 Suppl TR13):i-iv, 1-35.