文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

螺钉直径和长度对骨质疏松性椎体椎弓根螺钉固定强度的影响:有限元分析

Impact of Screw Diameter and Length on Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Matsukawa Keitaro, Yato Yoshiyuki, Imabayashi Hideaki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2021 Oct;15(5):566-574. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0353. Epub 2020 Dec 28.


DOI:10.31616/asj.2020.0353
PMID:33355846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8561163/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate the effect of screw size on screw fixation in osteoporotic vertebrae with finite element analysis (FEA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Osteoporosis poses a challenge in spinal instrumentation; however, the selection of screw size is directly related to fixation and is closely dependent on each surgeon's experience and preference. METHODS: Total 1,200 nonlinear FEA with various screw diameters (4.5-7.5 mm) and lengths (30-50 mm) were performed on 25 patients (seven men and 18 women; mean age, 75.2±10.8 years) with osteoporosis. The axial pullout strength, and the vertebral fixation strength of a paired-screw construct against flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were examined. Thereafter, we calculated the equivalent stress of the bone-screw interface during nondestructive loading. Then, using diameter parameters (screw diameter or screw fitness in the pedicle [%fill]), and length parameters (screw length or screw depth in the vertebral body [%length]), multiple regression analyses were performed in order to evaluate the factors affecting various fixations. RESULTS: Larger diameter and longer screws significantly increased the pullout strength and vertebral fixation strength; further, they decreased the equivalent stress around the screws. Multiple regression analyses showed that the actual screw diameter and %length were factors that had a stronger effect on the fixation strength than %fill and the actual screw length. Screw diameter had a greater effect on the resistance to screw pullout and flexion and extension loading (β =0.38-0.43, p <0.01); while the %length had a greater effect on resistance to lateral bending and axial rotation loading (β =0.25-0.36, p <0.01) as well as mechanical stress of the bone-screw interface (β =-0.42, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The screw size should be determined based on the biomechanical behavior of the screws, type of mechanical force applied on the corresponding vertebra, and anatomical limitations.

摘要

研究设计:生物力学研究。 目的:通过有限元分析(FEA)定量研究螺钉尺寸对骨质疏松性椎体螺钉固定的影响。 文献综述:骨质疏松给脊柱内固定带来挑战;然而,螺钉尺寸的选择直接关系到固定效果,且很大程度上取决于每位外科医生的经验和偏好。 方法:对25例(7名男性和18名女性;平均年龄75.2±10.8岁)骨质疏松患者进行了总共1200次非线性有限元分析,采用了不同直径(4.5 - 7.5毫米)和长度(30 - 50毫米)的螺钉。检测了轴向拔出力,以及双螺钉结构在屈曲、伸展、侧弯和轴向旋转时的椎体固定强度。此后,我们计算了无损加载过程中骨 - 螺钉界面的等效应力。然后,使用直径参数(螺钉直径或椎弓根内螺钉适配度[填充率%])和长度参数(螺钉长度或椎体中螺钉深度[长度%])进行多元回归分析,以评估影响各种固定的因素。 结果:较大直径和较长的螺钉显著提高了拔出力和椎体固定强度;此外,它们降低了螺钉周围的等效应力。多元回归分析表明,实际螺钉直径和长度%对固定强度的影响比填充率%和实际螺钉长度更强。螺钉直径对螺钉拔出阻力以及屈曲和伸展加载的影响更大(β = 0.38 - 0.43,p < 0.01);而长度%对侧弯和轴向旋转加载的阻力(β = 0.25 - 0.36,p < 0.01)以及骨 - 螺钉界面的机械应力(β = -0.42,p < 0.01)影响更大。 结论:应根据螺钉的生物力学行为、相应椎体上施加的机械力类型以及解剖学限制来确定螺钉尺寸。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/f430029abc04/asj-2020-0353f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/ac9d4ff3d997/asj-2020-0353f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/0e315c8c3927/asj-2020-0353f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/71cd1b76b339/asj-2020-0353f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/39c5322c8b35/asj-2020-0353f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/a75d8359a3f5/asj-2020-0353f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/f430029abc04/asj-2020-0353f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/ac9d4ff3d997/asj-2020-0353f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/0e315c8c3927/asj-2020-0353f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/71cd1b76b339/asj-2020-0353f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/39c5322c8b35/asj-2020-0353f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/a75d8359a3f5/asj-2020-0353f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e76/8561163/f430029abc04/asj-2020-0353f6.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Impact of Screw Diameter and Length on Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis.

Asian Spine J. 2021-10

[2]
Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation?

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016-3

[3]
Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015-10

[4]
Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-6

[5]
Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007-5-1

[6]
Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-11-15

[7]
A biomechanical study of the cortex-anchorage vertebral screw.

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2003-7

[8]
Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.

World Neurosurg. 2015-3

[9]
Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

J Biomech. 2018-3-21

[10]
Thoracic pedicle screw fixation under axial and perpendicular loadings: A comprehensive numerical analysis.

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Insertional torque and pullout strength of reinserted screws for sacroiliac joint fusion: Effects of implant dimensions, bone density, and tapping.

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-5-29

[2]
Visuohaptic Feedback in Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery for Pedicle Screw Placement.

J Clin Med. 2025-5-29

[3]
Biomechanical Evaluation of a C1-C2 Posterior Arch Screw Construct.

Global Spine J. 2025-4-29

[4]
Autonomous Establishment of CT-Independent Sections to Obtain Optimum Pedicle-Screw Axis in Direction, Length, and Safety Margin.

Int J Med Robot. 2025-4

[5]
A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.

Biomimetics (Basel). 2025-1-24

[6]
Computational Modeling, Augmented Reality, and Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024

[7]
A novel personalized homogenous finite element model to predict the pull-out strength of cancellous bone screws.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-11-7

[8]
Effect of screw insertion depth into fractured vertebrae in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-10-16

[9]
A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study.

Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024-3-11

[10]
An Outline on the Advancements in Surgical Management of Osteoporosis-Associated Fractures.

Cureus. 2024-6-26

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

J Biomech. 2018-3-21

[2]
Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength.

Eur Spine J. 2017-11

[3]
Minimizing Pedicle Screw Pullout Risks: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Design and Placement.

Clin Spine Surg. 2017-4

[4]
Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation?

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016-3

[5]
Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015-4

[6]
Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014-10-15

[7]
Bicortical versus unicortical pedicle screws in direct vertebral rotation: an in vitro experimental study.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012-8

[8]
Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter?

Eur Spine J. 2012-2-19

[9]
Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study.

Spine J. 2012-2-14

[10]
The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索