Matsukawa Keitaro, Yato Yoshiyuki, Imabayashi Hideaki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Asian Spine J. 2021 Oct;15(5):566-574. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0353. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. PURPOSE: To quantitatively investigate the effect of screw size on screw fixation in osteoporotic vertebrae with finite element analysis (FEA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Osteoporosis poses a challenge in spinal instrumentation; however, the selection of screw size is directly related to fixation and is closely dependent on each surgeon's experience and preference. METHODS: Total 1,200 nonlinear FEA with various screw diameters (4.5-7.5 mm) and lengths (30-50 mm) were performed on 25 patients (seven men and 18 women; mean age, 75.2±10.8 years) with osteoporosis. The axial pullout strength, and the vertebral fixation strength of a paired-screw construct against flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were examined. Thereafter, we calculated the equivalent stress of the bone-screw interface during nondestructive loading. Then, using diameter parameters (screw diameter or screw fitness in the pedicle [%fill]), and length parameters (screw length or screw depth in the vertebral body [%length]), multiple regression analyses were performed in order to evaluate the factors affecting various fixations. RESULTS: Larger diameter and longer screws significantly increased the pullout strength and vertebral fixation strength; further, they decreased the equivalent stress around the screws. Multiple regression analyses showed that the actual screw diameter and %length were factors that had a stronger effect on the fixation strength than %fill and the actual screw length. Screw diameter had a greater effect on the resistance to screw pullout and flexion and extension loading (β =0.38-0.43, p <0.01); while the %length had a greater effect on resistance to lateral bending and axial rotation loading (β =0.25-0.36, p <0.01) as well as mechanical stress of the bone-screw interface (β =-0.42, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The screw size should be determined based on the biomechanical behavior of the screws, type of mechanical force applied on the corresponding vertebra, and anatomical limitations.
研究设计:生物力学研究。 目的:通过有限元分析(FEA)定量研究螺钉尺寸对骨质疏松性椎体螺钉固定的影响。 文献综述:骨质疏松给脊柱内固定带来挑战;然而,螺钉尺寸的选择直接关系到固定效果,且很大程度上取决于每位外科医生的经验和偏好。 方法:对25例(7名男性和18名女性;平均年龄75.2±10.8岁)骨质疏松患者进行了总共1200次非线性有限元分析,采用了不同直径(4.5 - 7.5毫米)和长度(30 - 50毫米)的螺钉。检测了轴向拔出力,以及双螺钉结构在屈曲、伸展、侧弯和轴向旋转时的椎体固定强度。此后,我们计算了无损加载过程中骨 - 螺钉界面的等效应力。然后,使用直径参数(螺钉直径或椎弓根内螺钉适配度[填充率%])和长度参数(螺钉长度或椎体中螺钉深度[长度%])进行多元回归分析,以评估影响各种固定的因素。 结果:较大直径和较长的螺钉显著提高了拔出力和椎体固定强度;此外,它们降低了螺钉周围的等效应力。多元回归分析表明,实际螺钉直径和长度%对固定强度的影响比填充率%和实际螺钉长度更强。螺钉直径对螺钉拔出阻力以及屈曲和伸展加载的影响更大(β = 0.38 - 0.43,p < 0.01);而长度%对侧弯和轴向旋转加载的阻力(β = 0.25 - 0.36,p < 0.01)以及骨 - 螺钉界面的机械应力(β = -0.42,p < 0.01)影响更大。 结论:应根据螺钉的生物力学行为、相应椎体上施加的机械力类型以及解剖学限制来确定螺钉尺寸。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007-5-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001-11-15
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2003-7
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019-8
J Clin Med. 2025-5-29
Global Spine J. 2025-4-29
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-11-7
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-10-16
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014-10-15
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012-8
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010-8