Suppr超能文献

定义年轻急性髓系白血病患者最佳化疗总疗程数:三疗程与四疗程的比较。

Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses.

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Department of Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 10;39(8):890-901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01170. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction.

RESULTS

In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], = .02 and 43% 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of or , had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10 L.

CONCLUSION

Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of , or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit.

摘要

目的

对于患有急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)的年轻患者,最佳的治疗疗程尚不确定。英国国家癌症研究所 AML17 试验将不符合高危标准的患者随机分配至总共接受 3 个疗程或 4 个疗程的治疗。

患者和方法

患者接受基于柔红霉素和阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)的两个诱导疗程,通常联合吉妥珠单抗奥佐米星治疗。缓解后,1017 名患者被随机分配接受第三个疗程,即 MACE(安吖啶、Ara-C 和依托泊苷),加第四个疗程米托蒽醌和 Ara-C(MidAc),随后对一个或两个疗程高剂量 Ara-C 进行修订。主要终点是累积复发率(CIR)、无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)。结果与患者特征、突变、细胞遗传学、诱导治疗和诱导后可测量残留疾病(MRD)相关联。

结果

在对数秩分析中,接受 4 个疗程治疗的患者 CIR 和 5 年 RFS 均得到改善(50% vs 58%:风险比 [HR]0.81[0.69-0.97], =.02;43% vs 36%:HR0.83[0.71-0.98], =.03)。虽然 OS 无显著改善(63% vs 57%:HR0.84[0.69-1.03], =.09),但不能确立 3 个疗程与 4 个疗程相比不劣效。第四疗程仅在 Ara-C 时对复发有影响。在探索性分析中,尽管 MRD 影响生存,但第四疗程对 MRD 阳性或 MRD 阴性患者均无影响。对于缺乏 或 突变、其他基因的突变数<3 或初诊时白细胞计数<10×109/L 的患者,第四疗程有益。

结论

尽管第四疗程高剂量 Ara-C 降低了 CIR 并改善了 RFS,但并未显著提高 OS。包括细胞遗传学良好、缺乏 突变或其他突变数<3 的患者在内的亚组可能会获得生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0af/8177881/649437466bc6/jco-39-890-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验