The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jun;35(6):911-919. doi: 10.1177/0269215520984025. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
To investigate acceptability, barriers to adherence with the interventions, and which outcome measures best reflect the participants' rehabilitation goals in a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial evaluating early patient-directed rehabilitation and standard rehabilitation, including sling immobilisation for four weeks, following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.
Nested qualitative study.
Five English National Health Service Hospitals.
Nineteen patient participants who had undergone surgical repair of the rotator cuff and 10 healthcare practitioners involved in the trial.
Individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed thematically.
Four themes: (1) Preconceptions of early mobilisation; many participants were motivated to enter the trial for the opportunity of removing their sling and getting moving early. (2) Sling use and movement restrictions; for some, sling use for four weeks was unacceptable and contributed to their pain, rather than relieving it. (3) Tensions associated with early mobilisation; clinical tensions regarding early mobilisation and the perceived risk to the surgical repair were apparent. (4) Processes of running the trial; participants found the trial processes to be largely appropriate and acceptable, but withholding the results of the post-operative research ultrasound scan was contentious.
Trial processes were largely acceptable, except for withholding results of the ultrasound scan. For some participants, use of the shoulder sling for a prolonged period after surgery was a reported barrier to standard rehabilitation whereas the concept of early mobilisation contributed tension for some healthcare practitioners due to concern about the effect on the surgical repair.
调查接受度、坚持干预措施的障碍以及哪些结果衡量指标最能反映接受肩部肩袖修补术的患者在试点和可行性随机对照试验中康复目标,这些患者接受早期患者导向的康复和标准康复,包括吊带固定四周。
嵌套定性研究。
五家英国国家医疗服务体系医院。
19 名接受肩部肩袖修补术的患者参与者和 10 名参与试验的医疗保健从业者。
个体半结构化访谈。数据进行主题分析。
四个主题:(1)早期运动的先入之见;许多参与者有动机参加试验,是为了有机会去除吊带并尽早开始活动。(2)吊带使用和运动限制;对于一些人来说,四周的吊带使用是不可接受的,并且增加了他们的疼痛,而不是缓解疼痛。(3)与早期运动相关的紧张局势;早期运动和对手术修复的感知风险之间存在明显的临床紧张局势。(4)运行试验的过程;参与者发现试验过程基本是适当和可接受的,但扣留术后研究超声扫描的结果是有争议的。
试验过程基本是可接受的,但扣留超声扫描的结果除外。对于一些参与者来说,手术后长时间使用肩部吊带是标准康复的一个障碍,而早期运动的概念由于担心对手术修复的影响,对一些医疗保健从业者造成了紧张。