Suppr超能文献

物理治疗管理非创伤性肩部问题缺乏高质量的临床实践指南:使用 AGREE II 清单进行系统评价和质量评估。

Physical Therapy Management of Nontraumatic Shoulder Problems Lacks High-Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review With Quality Assessment Using the AGREE II Checklist.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Feb;51(2):63-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.9397. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for physical therapy management of nontraumatic shoulder pain disorders.

DESIGN

Systematic review of CPGs.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Two reviewers independently conducted a search of 7 databases and 7 gray literature sources.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

We included systematically developed CPGs for physical therapy management of nontraumatic musculoskeletal conditions of the shoulder in adults that were available in full text in the English language. We excluded CPGs for physical therapy management of surgically treated shoulder pain disorders.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three reviewers independently rated the quality of included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Data were compiled into tables that displayed AGREE II domain scores for each CPG and mean item scores across the CPGs.

RESULTS

We included 9 CPGs. Five CPGs focused on rotator cuff disorders, 2 focused on frozen shoulder, and 2 covered a range of soft tissue shoulder diagnoses. Three CPGs were judged as high quality (all were 5 or more years old) and 6 were judged as low quality. The quality domains in which CPGs were rated highest were "scope and purpose" (all CPGs scored greater than 50% and 4 scored greater than 80%) and "clarity of presentation" (all CPGs scored greater than 50% and 7 scored greater than 80%). The domains in which CPGs were rated most poorly were "applicability" (6 CPGs scored 40% or less) and "editorial independence" (4 CPGs scored less than 40%).

CONCLUSION

There were no high-quality, contemporary CPGs to guide physical therapy management of nontraumatic shoulder pain. .

摘要

目的

评价非创伤性肩部疼痛疾病物理治疗管理临床实践指南(CPG)的质量。

设计

CPG 的系统评价。

文献检索

两名审查员独立检索了 7 个数据库和 7 个灰色文献来源。

研究选择标准

我们纳入了针对成年人非创伤性肌肉骨骼肩部疾病的物理治疗管理的系统开发的 CPG,这些 CPG 可全文以英文提供。我们排除了针对肩部手术治疗疼痛疾病的物理治疗管理的 CPG。

数据综合

三名审查员使用评估指南研究与评估 II(AGREE II)工具独立评估纳入 CPG 的质量。数据被汇编成表格,显示每个 CPG 的 AGREE II 领域评分和 CPG 之间的平均项目评分。

结果

我们纳入了 9 项 CPG。其中 5 项 CPG 侧重于肩袖疾病,2 项侧重于冻结肩,2 项涵盖了一系列软组织肩部诊断。有 3 项 CPG 被评为高质量(均为 5 年或以上),6 项被评为低质量。CPG 评分最高的质量领域是“范围和目的”(所有 CPG 的评分均大于 50%,其中 4 项评分大于 80%)和“表述清晰度”(所有 CPG 的评分均大于 50%,其中 7 项评分大于 80%)。CPG 评分最差的领域是“适用性”(6 项 CPG 的评分在 40%或以下)和“编辑独立性”(4 项 CPG 的评分低于 40%)。

结论

没有高质量、现代的 CPG 可以指导非创伤性肩部疼痛的物理治疗管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验