• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知负荷理论:对药学教育评估的启示。

Cognitive load theory: Implications for assessment in pharmacy education.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.

College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1645-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.009
PMID:33358136
Abstract

The concept of mental workload is well studied from a learner's perspective but has yet to be better understood from the perspective of an assessor. Mental workload is largely associated with cognitive load theory, which describes three different types of load. Intrinsic load deals with the complexity of the task, extraneous load describes distractors to the task at hand, and germane load focuses on the development of schemas in working memory for future recall. Studies from medical education show that all three types of load are relevant when considering rater -based assessment (e.g. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), or experiential training). Assessments with high intrinsic and extraneous load may interfere with assessors' attention and working memory and result in poorer quality assessment. Reducing these loads within assessment tasks should therefore be a priority for pharmacy educators. This commentary aims to provide a theoretical overview of mental workload in assessment, outline research findings from the medical education context, and propose strategies to be considered for reducing mental workload in rater-based assessments relevant to pharmacy education. Suggestions for future research are also addressed.

摘要

从学习者的角度来看,心理工作量的概念已经得到了很好的研究,但从评估者的角度来看,还需要更好地理解。心理工作量与认知负荷理论密切相关,该理论描述了三种不同类型的负荷。内在负荷涉及任务的复杂性,附加负荷描述了手头任务的干扰因素,相关负荷则专注于工作记忆中模式的发展,以便将来回忆。医学教育的研究表明,在考虑基于评分者的评估(例如客观结构化临床考试(OSCEs)或经验性培训)时,这三种负荷都很重要。内在负荷和外在负荷高的评估可能会干扰评分者的注意力和工作记忆,并导致评估质量下降。因此,在评估任务中减轻这些负荷应该是药学教育者的首要任务。本评论旨在提供评估中心理工作量的理论概述,概述医学教育背景下的研究结果,并提出在与药学教育相关的基于评分者的评估中减轻心理工作量应考虑的策略。还讨论了未来研究的建议。

相似文献

1
Cognitive load theory: Implications for assessment in pharmacy education.认知负荷理论:对药学教育评估的启示。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1645-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Optimizing assessors' mental workload in rater-based assessment: a critical narrative review.基于评估者的评分评估中评估者心理工作量的优化:批判性叙事评论。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Dec;8(6):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-00535-6.
3
Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies.认知负荷理论在健康专业教育中的应用:设计原则与策略。
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x.
4
Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86.认知负荷理论:对医学教育的启示:AMEE指南第86号
Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):371-84. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Effects of cognitive appraisal and mental workload factors on performance in an arithmetic task.认知评估和心理负荷因素对算术任务表现的影响。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015 Dec;40(4):313-25. doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9302-0.
6
A multidisciplinary approach of workload assessment in real-job situations: investigation in the field of aerospace activities.实际工作场景中工作量评估的多学科方法:航空航天活动领域的调查
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 3;5:964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00964. eCollection 2014.
7
Unpacking the Complexity of Patient Handoffs Through the Lens of Cognitive Load Theory.从认知负荷理论视角剖析患者交接的复杂性
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):88-96. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1107491.
8
Learner, Patient, and Supervisor Features Are Associated With Different Types of Cognitive Load During Procedural Skills Training: Implications for Teaching and Instructional Design.学习者、患者和督导者的特征与程序技能培训期间不同类型的认知负荷相关:对教学和教学设计的启示。
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1622-1631. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001690.
9
Simulation-based education for novices: complex learning tasks promote reflective practice.基于模拟的新手教育:复杂的学习任务促进反思性实践。
Med Educ. 2019 Apr;53(4):380-389. doi: 10.1111/medu.13748. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
What is the relationship between mental workload factors and cognitive load types?心理工作负荷因素与认知负荷类型之间有什么关系?
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Mar;83(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.023. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative Study on Cognitive Load in Epilepsy Specialist Nurse Training in Northeast China: A Phenomenological Study Among Ten Trained Nurses.中国东北地区癫痫专科护士培训中认知负荷的质性研究:对十名受训护士的现象学研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 23;18:5173-5185. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S530409. eCollection 2025.
2
Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.使用基于微信的认知负荷训练平台降低护士报告不良事件的障碍:一项开放标签随机对照试验
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 21;18:947-961. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S482233. eCollection 2025.
3
Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system.
超越可靠性:使用行为标记系统时评估评分者能力
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Dec 31;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9.
4
Online learning resources and social media platforms used by medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.医学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用的在线学习资源和社交媒体平台。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):969. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04906-w.
5
Impact of Clinical Decision Support System Assisted prevention and management for Delirium on guideline adherence and cognitive load among Intensive Care Unit nurses (CDSSD-ICU): Protocol of a multicentre, cluster randomized trial.临床决策支持系统辅助预防和管理谵妄对 ICU 护士遵循指南和认知负荷的影响(CDSSD-ICU):一项多中心、集群随机试验方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0293950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293950. eCollection 2023.
6
A Pharmacy Drug Knowledge Assessment Pilot: Who Will Fly Farthest and What Downs the Plane?一项药房药物知识评估试点:谁能飞得最远,什么会使飞机坠毁?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 May 13;11(3):85. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030085.