• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非华法林口服抗凝剂共付额与房颤患者的依从性:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics; Department of Medicine; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics; Department of Medicine; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Mar;233:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.010
PMID:33358690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with atrial fibrillation, incomplete adherence to anticoagulants increases risk of stroke. Non-warfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are expensive; we evaluated whether higher copayments are associated with lower NOAC adherence.

METHODS

Using a national claims database of commercially-insured patients, we performed a cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation who newly initiated a NOAC from 2012 to 2018. Patients were stratified into low (<$35), medium ($35-$59), or high (≥$60) copayments and propensity-score weighted based on demographics, insurance characteristics, comorbidities, prior health care utilization, calendar year, and the NOAC received. Follow-up was 1 year, with censoring for switching to a different anticoagulant, undergoing an ablation procedure, disenrolling from the insurance plan, or death. The primary outcome was adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary outcomes included NOAC discontinuation (no refill for 30 days after the end of NOAC supply) and switching anticoagulants. We compared PDC using a Kruskal-Wallis test and rates of discontinuation and switching using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

After weighting patients across the 3 copayment groups, the effective sample size was 17,558 patients, with balance across 50 clinical and demographic covariates (standardized differences <0.1). Mean age was 62 years, 29% of patients were female, and apixaban (43%), and rivaroxaban (38%) were the most common NOACs. Higher copayments were associated with lower adherence (P < .001), with a PDC of 0.82 (Interquartile range [IQR] 0.36-0.98) among those with high copayments, 0.85 (IQR 0.41-0.98) among those with medium copayments, and 0.88 (IQR 0.41-0.99) among those with low copayments. Compared to patients with low copayments, patients with high copayments had higher rates of discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.19; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating NOACs, higher copayments in commercial insurance were associated with lower adherence and higher rates of discontinuation in the first year. Policies to lower or limit cost-sharing of important medications may lead to improved adherence and better outcomes among patients receiving NOACs.

摘要

背景

在患有心房颤动的患者中,抗凝药物治疗不依从会增加中风风险。非华法林口服抗凝剂(NOAC)价格昂贵;我们评估了较高的共付额是否与较低的 NOAC 依从性相关。

方法

我们使用全国商业保险患者的索赔数据库,对 2012 年至 2018 年新开始使用 NOAC 的心房颤动患者进行了队列研究。患者分为低(<$35)、中($35-$59)或高(≥$60)共付额,并根据人口统计学、保险特征、合并症、既往医疗保健利用情况、日历年度和接受的 NOAC 进行倾向评分加权。随访 1 年,随访截止点为改用其他抗凝剂、行消融术、退出保险计划或死亡。主要结局为通过比例天数覆盖(PDC)测量的依从性。次要结局包括 NOAC 停药(NOAC 供应结束后 30 天无再配药)和更换抗凝剂。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较 PDC,使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较停药和换药率。

结果

在对 3 个共付额组的患者进行加权后,有效样本量为 17558 例患者,50 个临床和人口统计学协变量平衡(标准化差异<0.1)。平均年龄为 62 岁,29%的患者为女性,最常见的 NOAC 为阿哌沙班(43%)和利伐沙班(38%)。较高的共付额与较低的依从性相关(P<0.001),高共付额组的 PDC 为 0.82(四分位距 [IQR] 0.36-0.98),中共付额组为 0.85(IQR 0.41-0.98),低共付额组为 0.88(IQR 0.41-0.99)。与低共付额组相比,高共付额组的停药率更高(风险比 [HR] 1.13,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.08-1.19;P<0.001)。

结论

在新开始使用 NOAC 的心房颤动患者中,商业保险中较高的共付额与第一年较低的依从性和较高的停药率相关。降低或限制重要药物费用共付额的政策可能会提高接受 NOAC 治疗的患者的依从性并改善其结局。

相似文献

1
Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study.非华法林口服抗凝剂共付额与房颤患者的依从性:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Am Heart J. 2021 Mar;233:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Absolute Benefit and Harm Assessments Yield Novel Insights.非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂与华法林用于房颤患者:绝对获益和危害评估带来新的见解。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2016 Apr;34(2):100-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12173.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants for Ischemic Stroke Prophylaxis Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者缺血性脑卒中预防的口服抗凝剂成本效益分析。
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1555-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012325. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US.在美国,新型口服抗凝剂用于治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞患者时与华法林或安慰剂相比的医疗成本差异比较。
J Med Econ. 2015 Jun;18(6):399-409. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
5
Adherence to Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Incident, Treatment-Naïve Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.依诺肝素、达比加群和阿哌沙班预防新发、未经治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中和体循环栓塞的依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1319-1329. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1319.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Standard-Dose Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With a Single Stroke Risk Factor: A Nationwide Cohort Study.伴有单一卒中危险因素的房颤患者中标准剂量非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂和华法林的有效性和安全性:一项全国性队列研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):872-881. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1883.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2018 Dec;49(12):2933-2944. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232.
8
Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with Well-Managed Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding.比较非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂与华法林在高出血风险的心房颤动患者中的卒中预防的成本效果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Aug;18(4):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0279-y.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Impaired Liver Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在肝功能受损的心房颤动患者中的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 7;7(15):e009263. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009263.
10
Drug Utilization Pattern of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.口服抗凝药物在心房颤动患者中的用药模式:韩国全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jul;39(7):3112-3130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02151-z. Epub 2022 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Out-of-pocket costs for direct oral anticoagulants and prescription abandonment among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.非瓣膜性心房颤动或静脉血栓栓塞患者使用直接口服抗凝剂的自付费用及处方放弃情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Apr;31(4):366-376. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.366.
2
Health Care Spending After Initiating Sacubitril-Valsartan vs Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers for Heart Failure Treatment.与肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂相比,起始沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭后的医疗保健支出。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Feb 7;6(2):e245385. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5385.
3
Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Dabigatran as a Bridging Therapy while Optimizing Warfarin Dosage for Cardioembolic Stroke.
直接口服抗凝剂达比加群作为桥接治疗,同时优化华法林剂量用于心源性栓塞性卒中
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2025;15(1):48-55. doi: 10.1159/000543301. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences.与医生抗生素处方偏好相关因素的全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):838-846. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09195-7. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
5
Social drivers in atrial fibrillation occurrence, screening, treatment, and outcomes: systematic-narrative hybrid review.心房颤动发生、筛查、治疗及预后中的社会驱动因素:系统叙述性混合综述
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 Jul 31;26(Suppl 4):iv50-iv60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae073. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Not all cost conversations are the same: An exploration of potential value in cost conversations during Atrial fibrillation treatment decision making.并非所有的成本对话都是一样的:在心房颤动治疗决策过程中探讨成本对话的潜在价值。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Nov;128:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
7
Measuring and Understanding Market Exclusivity Length for New Prescription Drugs in France, Australia, and the USA.测量和理解法国、澳大利亚和美国新处方药的市场独占期长度。
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Jul;38(4):303-310. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00527-w. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
8
Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Competition.生物类似药竞争后生物药的患者自付费用。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e235429. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5429.
9
Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.临床实践及复杂情况下接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 13;12(18):5955. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185955.
10
Association of Prescription Co-payment With Adherence to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Diabetes.心力衰竭合并糖尿病患者的处方共付额与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 抑制剂治疗依从性的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2316290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16290.