Division of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Division of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1245-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.207. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
(1) to improve the comprehension of the topographical position of the talar dome beneath the inferior articular surface of the tibia and, (2) to illustrate the changes of possible access to the articular surface of the talar dome during arthroscopic treatment of talar osteochondral defects in an anatomical model.
Twenty matched pairs (n = 40) of anatomical ankle specimen were used. All specimens were mounted in a standardized fashion, 3-dimensional radiography was performed in 4 defined positions (maximum dorsiflexion, neutral position, noninvasive distraction, and maximum plantarflexion). All radiographs were analyzed and statistically compared.
Anterior accessibility was highest in maximum plantarflexion (medial: 49.20 ± 9.86%, lateral: 48.19 ± 8.85%), followed by non-invasive distraction (medial: 33.60 ± 7.96%, lateral: 31.98 ± 8.30%). Neutral position (medial: 19.34 ± 6.90%, lateral: 17.54 ± 6.63%) and dorsiflexion (medial: 15.36 ± 5.03%, lateral: 13.88 ± 4.33%) were not able to significantly increase accessibility. Posterior accessibility was greatest in maximum dorsiflexion (medial: 56.69 ± 9.65%, lateral: 46.82 ± 8.36%), followed by neutral position of the ankle joint (medial: 40.95 ± 8.28%, lateral: 31.06 ± 6.92%). Noninvasive distraction (medial: 31.41 ± 8.18%, lateral: 22.99 ± 7.63%) was still significantly better than plantarflexion (medial: 14.54 ± 5.10%, lateral: 13.89 ± 3.14%) and slightly increased accessibility to the talar dome. Medially, a central area of 5.89 ± 9.76% was accessible by maximum plantarflexion and maximum dorsiflexion from anterior and posterior, respectively, laterally a central blind spot of 4.99 ± 8.61% was detected.
From an anatomical point of view, maximum joint positions of the ankle (i.e., plantarflexion and dorsiflexion) allow for better access to the talar dome in anterior and posterior ankle arthroscopy. Noninvasive distraction may increase accessibility in anterior approaches, but has no benefit from posterior.
This study provides insight into the morphology of the ankle joint in a standardized laboratory setup and illustrates the influence of different surgically relevant ankle joint positions. The presented data allow for better preoperative planning for the arthroscopic treatment of talar osteochondral defects.
(1)提高对胫骨下关节面下距骨穹顶的解剖位置的理解,(2)在解剖模型中展示在关节镜下治疗距骨骨软骨缺损时,关节表面的可能进入方式的变化。
使用 20 对(n=40)匹配的解剖踝关节标本。所有标本均以标准化方式安装,在 4 个定义位置(最大背屈、中立位、非侵入性牵开和最大跖屈)进行三维射线照相。所有射线照相均进行了分析和统计学比较。
最大跖屈时的前向可达性最高(内侧:49.20±9.86%,外侧:48.19±8.85%),其次是非侵入性牵开(内侧:33.60±7.96%,外侧:31.98±8.30%)。中立位(内侧:19.34±6.90%,外侧:17.54±6.63%)和背屈(内侧:15.36±5.03%,外侧:13.88±4.33%)均不能显著增加可达性。最大背屈时的后向可达性最大(内侧:56.69±9.65%,外侧:46.82±8.36%),其次是踝关节中立位(内侧:40.95±8.28%,外侧:31.06±6.92%)。非侵入性牵开(内侧:31.41±8.18%,外侧:22.99±7.63%)仍明显优于跖屈(内侧:14.54±5.10%,外侧:13.89±3.14%),并略微增加了距骨穹顶的可达性。在内侧,最大跖屈和最大背屈时从前部和后部分别可到达 5.89±9.76%的中央区域,而在外侧,检测到 4.99±8.61%的中央盲区。
从解剖学角度来看,踝关节的最大关节位置(即跖屈和背屈)允许在前侧和后侧踝关节关节镜下更好地进入距骨穹顶。非侵入性牵开可增加前入路的可达性,但对后入路没有益处。
本研究提供了在标准化实验室环境下对踝关节解剖结构的深入了解,并说明了不同与手术相关的踝关节位置的影响。所提供的数据可更好地为距骨骨软骨缺损的关节镜治疗进行术前规划。