Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102848. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102848. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The right choice of dressing after skin grafting, especially in the anatomically complex and aesthetically important head and neck area, is difficult. It is important to have a dressing which is durable and doesn't need a lot of dressing changes. This study introduces a novel, individually moulded silicon dressing; and investigates the number of dressing changes, durability of the dressing and the aesthetic outcome of patients receiving this new type of dressing, in comparison to a control group.
The present retrospective single center controlled case series study reports our experiences using two different types of dressing on patients undergoing full thickness skin grafts in the head during the period 01 May 2016 to 01 May 2020. Data were analysed according to the type of dressing with either a transparent moulded silicone dressing or an established silicone sheet dressing.
52 patients were included in the study. We found no difference in the aesthetic outcome and complication rate (p > 0.05) between the two groups. The number of days until first dressing change after surgery, the number of dressing changes or follow up visits in the outpatient care until complete wound healing, and the overall number of dressing changes were all statistically significantly reduced (p < 0.05).
Addition-cured silicone used as a moulded dressing in full thickness skin grafts has longer durability and leads to a significant reduction of dressing changes with equal aesthetic outcome compared to an establishes silicone sheet dressing.
在进行皮肤移植后,选择合适的敷料非常困难,尤其是在解剖结构复杂且对美观要求较高的头部和颈部区域。理想的敷料应具有耐用性,且无需频繁更换。本研究介绍了一种新型的个体化成型硅酮敷料,并将其与对照组进行比较,以评估其更换敷料的次数、敷料的耐用性以及患者的美学效果。
本回顾性单中心对照病例系列研究报告了我们在 2016 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 1 日期间对头部全厚皮片移植患者使用两种不同类型敷料的经验。根据使用的敷料类型进行数据分析,分别为透明成型硅酮敷料或传统硅酮片敷料。
本研究共纳入 52 例患者。我们发现两组患者的美学效果和并发症发生率无差异(p>0.05)。术后首次更换敷料的时间、门诊随访次数直至伤口完全愈合以及总的更换敷料次数均显著减少(p<0.05)。
与传统硅酮片敷料相比,加成固化硅酮作为全厚皮片移植的成型敷料具有更长的耐用性,可显著减少更换敷料的次数,同时具有相同的美学效果。