Williamson Victoria, Greenberg Neil, Murphy Dominic
King's Centre for Military Health Research, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6 GG, UK.
King's Centre for Military Health Research, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Feb;112:104889. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104889. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
Moral injury is known to be associated with mental health difficulties in US military populations, however its impact on wellbeing in a UK Armed Forces (AF) context is less well understood. Additionally, it is not clear whether other factors known to affect service personnel's mental health, such as adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) or military trauma, may influence whether personnel experience moral injury.
To examine the relationship between moral injury and ACEs, adverse military events as well as the impact of moral injury on the mental health of UK AF veterans.
A nationally representative sample of UK AF veterans seeking psychological treatment (n = 177) were recruited. Participants completed self-report psychometric measures and expressions of moral injury, ACEs and traumatic in-service events.
Analyses yielded a significant association between ACEs and veteran expressions of moral injury (p < .001). A significant although weak relationship was found between veteran expressions of moral injury and experiencing adverse events during military service, including physical abuse (AOR 1.04; 95 % CI 1.02-1.06) and emotional abuse (AOR 1.03; 1.01-1.05). Those meeting criteria for mental health disorders, including probable posttraumatic stress disorder (AOR 1.09; 95 % CI 1.05-1.12), were significantly more likely to report expressions of moral injury.
These results illustrate the relationship between traumatic life events, including childhood adversity, and experiencing moral injury in UK AF veterans. The findings underscore the need for a validated measurement tool appropriate for the UK AF to better understand the impact of moral injury on wellbeing and to ensure that appropriate treatment can be given to those identified as suffering post-trauma.
已知道德伤害与美国军人的心理健康问题有关,然而在英国武装部队(AF)背景下,其对幸福感的影响尚不太清楚。此外,尚不清楚其他已知会影响军人心理健康的因素,如童年不良经历(ACEs)或军事创伤,是否会影响人员是否经历道德伤害。
研究道德伤害与ACEs、不良军事事件之间的关系,以及道德伤害对英国AF退伍军人心理健康的影响。
招募了一个具有全国代表性的寻求心理治疗的英国AF退伍军人样本(n = 177)。参与者完成了自我报告的心理测量量表以及道德伤害、ACEs和在职创伤事件的表达。
分析得出ACEs与退伍军人的道德伤害表达之间存在显著关联(p <.001)。退伍军人的道德伤害表达与在军事服役期间经历不良事件之间发现了显著但较弱的关系,包括身体虐待(优势比1.04;95%置信区间1.02 - 1.06)和情感虐待(优势比1.03;1.01 - 1.05)。符合心理健康障碍标准的人,包括可能的创伤后应激障碍(优势比1.09;95%置信区间1.05 - 1.12),报告道德伤害表达的可能性显著更高。
这些结果说明了包括童年逆境在内的创伤性生活事件与英国AF退伍军人经历道德伤害之间的关系。研究结果强调需要一种适用于英国AF的经过验证的测量工具,以更好地理解道德伤害对幸福感的影响,并确保能够为那些被确定为遭受创伤后痛苦的人提供适当的治疗。