UES, Inc., Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing/RHMO, 2510 Fifth Street, Area B, Building 840, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA.
UES, Inc., Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing/RHMO, 2510 Fifth Street, Area B, Building 840, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2021 Jan 11;1636:461784. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461784. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
Commercial gas chromatograph-mass spectrometers, one of which being Inficon's HAPSITE® ER, have demonstrated chemical detection and identification of nerve agents (G-series) and blistering agents (mustard gas) in the field; however most analyses relies on self-contained or external calibration that inherently drifts over time. We describe an analytical approach that uses target-based thermal desorption standards, called focusing agents, to accurately calculate concentrations of chemical warfare agents that are analyzed by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Here, we provide relative response factors of focusing agents (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide, diisopropyl fluorophosphate, diethyl methylphosphonate, diethyl malonate, methyl salicylate, and dichlorvos) that are used to quantify concentrations of tabun, sarin, soman, cyclosarin and sulfur mustard loaded on thermal desorption tubes (Tenax® TA). Aging effects of focusing agents are evaluated by monitoring deviations in quantification as thermal desorption tubes age in storage at room temperature and relative humidity. The addition of focusing agents improves the quantification of tabun, sarin, soman, cyclosarin and sulfur mustard that is analyzed within the same day as well as a 14-day period. Among the six focusing agents studied here, diisopropyl fluorophosphate has the best performance for nerve agents (G-series) and blistering agents (mustard gas) compared to other focusing agents in this work and is recommended for field use for quantification. The use of focusing agent in the field leads to more accurate and reliable quantification of Tabun (GA), Sarin (GB), Soman (GD), Cyclosarin (GF) and Sulfur Mustard (HD) than the traditional internal standard. Future improvements on the detection of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive materials (CBRNE) can be safely demonstrated with standards calibrated for harmful agents.
商用气相色谱-质谱联用仪,其中一种是英福康的 HAPSITE® ER,已在现场证明了对神经毒剂(G 系列)和糜烂性毒剂(芥子气)的化学检测和识别;然而,大多数分析都依赖于自包含或外部校准,而这些校准随着时间的推移会发生漂移。我们描述了一种分析方法,该方法使用基于目标的热解吸标准品,称为聚焦剂,来准确计算气相色谱-质谱分析的化学战剂浓度。在这里,我们提供了聚焦剂(2-氯乙基乙基硫醚、二异丙基氟磷酸酯、二乙基甲基膦酸酯、二乙基丙二酸酯、水杨酸甲酯和敌敌畏)的相对响应因子,这些聚焦剂用于量化加载在热解吸管(Tenax® TA)上的塔崩、沙林、梭曼、沙林和芥子气的浓度。通过监测在室温相对湿度下储存时热解吸管老化过程中定量的偏差,评估聚焦剂的老化效应。添加聚焦剂可提高当天以及 14 天内分析的塔崩、沙林、梭曼、沙林和芥子气的定量结果。在本研究中研究的六种聚焦剂中,与其他聚焦剂相比,二异丙基氟磷酸酯在神经毒剂(G 系列)和糜烂性毒剂(芥子气)方面的性能最好,建议在现场用于定量。与传统的内标相比,在现场使用聚焦剂可更准确可靠地定量检测塔崩(GA)、沙林(GB)、梭曼(GD)、沙林(GF)和芥子气(HD)。使用针对有害剂校准的标准,可安全地展示对化学、生物、放射性、核和爆炸物(CBRNE)的检测的改进。