Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, University Station A1100, Austin, TX 78759, USA.
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, University Station A1100, Austin, TX 78759, USA.
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105826. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105826. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
Previous literature has documented that college professors view hypothetical students who stutter more negatively than their fluent peers. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether individuals who stutter report they experience more negative perceptions in the college classroom, and the impact of those perceptions on their comfort approaching professors.
Two hundred forty-six adults who do and do not stutter, matched for age, participated in this study. Participants were presented with 16 positive and negative personality traits and asked to rate how strongly they believed their professor viewed them along each trait. All participants were asked whether they felt comfortable approaching their professors to discuss their performance. Adults who stutter were asked additional questions to investigate their college experience more comprehensively.
Adults who stutter reported they experienced significantly more negative perceptions from their professors than adults who do not stutter, and were significantly less likely to feel comfortable approaching their professors. These reported negative perceptions, specifically being perceived as less self-assured, predicted comfort approaching professors to receive performance feedback for adults who stutter. Finally, amongst adults who stutter, perception of how they were evaluated compared to their peers was significantly related to comfort approaching professors.
Results support that the negative perceptions towards hypothetical students who stutter reported in previous literature are experienced by individuals who stutter, and that these perceptions drive comfort approaching professors for performative feedback. Results suggest professors may increase students' comfort by clearly outlining equality in evaluation procedures.
先前的文献记录表明,大学教授对有口吃的假设学生的看法比他们流利的同龄人更为负面。本研究的目的是调查口吃者是否报告在大学课堂上经历更多的负面看法,以及这些看法对口吃者接近教授的舒适度的影响。
本研究共有 246 名口吃和不口吃的成年人参与,他们的年龄相匹配。参与者被呈现了 16 个积极和消极的人格特质,并被要求对教授对他们在每个特质上的看法的强烈程度进行评级。所有参与者都被问到他们是否感到舒适地接近教授讨论他们的表现。口吃者被问到额外的问题,以更全面地调查他们的大学经历。
口吃者报告说,他们从教授那里得到的负面看法比不口吃者明显更多,而且他们感到不太舒适地接近教授。这些负面看法,特别是被认为缺乏自信,预测了口吃者接近教授以获得表现反馈的舒适度。最后,在口吃者中,他们对自己与同龄人被评价的看法与接近教授的舒适度显著相关。
研究结果支持了先前文献中报告的对口吃假设学生的负面看法是由口吃者经历的,并且这些看法影响了他们接近教授获得表现反馈的舒适度。研究结果表明,教授可以通过明确概述评估程序的平等性来增加学生的舒适度。