Thompson R S, Michnich M E, Friedlander L, Gilson B, Grothaus L C, Storer B
Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA 98121.
Med Care. 1988 Jan;26(1):62-76. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198801000-00007.
Using a complete factorial design, we tested three interventions for smoking cessation in routine primary care practice. The interventions tested were 1) physician counseling, 2) mailed letters and educational materials designed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and 3) referral to smoking cessation classes. Thirty-seven family practice physicians at three of Group Health's outpatient facilities participated. Patient participation rates were 95%, and follow-up was complete for 92% of those participating. None of the interventions had any effect on point prevalence of quitting as determined 8-9 months later by self-report. However, the combination of physician counseling and NCI materials doubled the odds of occurrence of significant antismoking behavior (quit, quit and relapse, or cut down) during the ensuing 8-9 months in those individuals receiving that combination. Referral to smoking cessation classes was strikingly ineffective in this setting. Of 369 individuals designated by study design for referral, only 14% even investigated the classes. This compares with a 10% self-referral rate for those persons not designated for referral by our study design. Our results and other recent work suggest that more intensive interventions on multiple occasions based on relapse prevention strategies hold promise for future success in smoking cessation efforts in primary care.
我们采用完全析因设计,在常规初级保健实践中测试了三种戒烟干预措施。所测试的干预措施包括:1)医生咨询;2)邮寄由美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)设计的信件和教育材料;3)转介至戒烟课程。健康集团的三个门诊机构的37名家庭医生参与其中。患者参与率为95%,92%的参与者完成了随访。自我报告显示,8至9个月后,没有一种干预措施对戒烟点患病率有任何影响。然而,在接下来的8至9个月里,接受医生咨询和NCI材料组合的个体出现显著戒烟行为(戒烟、戒烟后复吸或减少吸烟量)的几率增加了一倍。在这种情况下,转介至戒烟课程的效果非常不佳。在研究设计指定转介的369人中,只有14%的人甚至去了解了这些课程。相比之下,未被我们的研究设计指定转介的人自我转介率为10%。我们的研究结果和其他近期研究表明,基于预防复吸策略的多次强化干预措施有望在初级保健戒烟工作中取得未来的成功。