Morotti Fábio, de Campos Jefferson Tadeu, Lunardelli Paula Alvares, Costa Camila Bortoliero, Bergamo Larissa Zamparone, Barreiros Thales Ricardo Rigo, Dos Santos Gustavo Martins Gomes, Seneda Marcelo Marcondes
Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, University of Londrina, Parana, .
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, University of North Parana, Bandeirantes, PR, .
Anim Reprod. 2018 Aug 16;15(1):17-22. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-2017-AR928.
The aims of this study were I) to compare the follicular diameter, corpus luteum diameter and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations in cows treated with conventional protocol injectable P4 protocol; II) to determine the serum P4 profile in ovariectomized heifers; and III) to compare pregnancy rate between protocols. In experiment I, multiparous cows received a protocol for ovulation synchronization with an intravaginal P4 device (n = 38; device + EB day 0; device removal + PGF2α + eCG + EC day 8) or injectable P4 (n = 38; injection + EB day 0; PGF2α + eCG + EC day 8). In experiment II, ovariectomized heifers (n = 8) were treated with injectable P4 and blood samples were collected to determine the serum P4 profile. In experiment III, multiparous cows were timed AI with two different P4 approaches, intravaginal P4 device (n = 48) or injectable P4 (n = 47). In the first experiment, cows treated with P4 device had higher (P < 0.05) diameter of dominant follicle after ovulation induction (11.6 ± 1.8 10.3 ± 1.8 mm) and ovulation rate (97%, 37/38 . 47.3%, 18/38) than cows treated with injectable P4. But, the follicular growth daily was higher (P < 0.05) in cows treated with injectable P4 than intravaginal device (1.3 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.3 mm/day, respectively). In experiment II, the P4 concentration peak occurred within 48 hours (6.54 ng/mL) and decreased after 96 hours (P < 0.05) after P4 injection. In experiment III, cows with P4 device had higher (P < 0.05) pregnancy rate than the injectable P4 group (60.4 34.0%, respectively). These results demonstrate that although the intravaginal P4 devices showed a higher pregnancy rate, a protocol with injectable P4 represents an easier method and a promising alternative for TAI in cattle.
I)比较采用传统方案(注射用孕酮方案)处理的奶牛的卵泡直径、黄体直径和血清孕酮(P4)浓度;II)测定去卵巢小母牛的血清P4水平;III)比较不同方案间的妊娠率。在实验I中,经产奶牛采用阴道内孕酮装置进行排卵同步化处理(n = 38;装置 + 第0天注射雌二醇苯甲酸酯;第8天取出装置 + 注射前列腺素F2α + 注射孕马血清促性腺激素 + 胚胎移植)或注射用孕酮处理(n = 38;注射 + 第0天注射雌二醇苯甲酸酯;第8天注射前列腺素F2α + 注射孕马血清促性腺激素 + 胚胎移植)。在实验II中,对去卵巢小母牛(n = 8)采用注射用孕酮处理,并采集血样以测定血清P4水平。在实验III中,经产奶牛采用两种不同的孕酮方法进行定时人工授精,即阴道内孕酮装置(n = 48)或注射用孕酮(n = 47)。在第一个实验中,与注射用孕酮处理的奶牛相比,采用孕酮装置处理的奶牛在诱导排卵后优势卵泡直径更大(P < 0.05)(分别为11.6 ± 1.8对10.3 ± 1.8毫米)且排卵率更高(97%,37/38对47.3%,18/38)。但是,注射用孕酮处理的奶牛卵泡每日生长速度比阴道内装置处理的奶牛更高(P < 0.05)(分别为1.3 ± 0.4对1.0 ± 0.3毫米/天)。在实验II中,注射孕酮后48小时内P4浓度达到峰值(6.54纳克/毫升),96小时后下降(P < 0.05)。在实验III中,采用孕酮装置处理的奶牛妊娠率高于注射用孕酮组(分别为60.4%对34.0%,P < 0.05)。这些结果表明,尽管阴道内孕酮装置显示出更高的妊娠率,但注射用孕酮方案是一种更简便的方法,也是牛定时人工授精的一种有前景的替代方法。