Department of Political Economy, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Br J Sociol. 2021 Mar;72(2):286-299. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12799. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
A growing strand of the literature finds a causal negative impact of terrorism on undifferentiated discriminatory attitudes toward Muslims, migrants, and other minorities. In this paper, we argue that jihadist terrorism threatens first and foremost Muslims. To evaluate this claim, we estimate the causal effect of jihadist terrorism on the perceived discrimination among Muslims through a 2×2 quasi-experimental design. Exploiting "natural experiments" driven by exogenous variation in terror threat caused by jihadist attacks that unexpectedly occurred during the fieldwork of a large survey, we compare the perceived ethoracial discrimination of the relevant minority (Muslims) against other minorities (non-Muslims) before and after five different terror attacks in five different European countries. We find that jihadist attacks increase perceived ethnoracial discrimination among Muslims while reducing it among non-Muslims, and that individual-level factors including social status and economic insecurity mitigate public opinion responses to a greater extent than group-level factors do. Hence, while in-group attitudes toward out-groups tend to be undifferentiated, the experience of out-groups in the aftermath of jihadist attacks depends on the specific identity of the respondents.
越来越多的文献发现,恐怖主义对穆斯林、移民和其他少数群体的无差别歧视态度具有因果负面影响。在本文中,我们认为圣战恐怖主义首先威胁到穆斯林。为了评估这一说法,我们通过 2×2 准实验设计来估计圣战恐怖主义对穆斯林感知歧视的因果效应。我们利用圣战袭击引发的恐怖威胁的外生变化所带来的“自然实验”,这些变化在一项大型调查的实地调查期间意外发生,我们比较了在五个不同的欧洲国家发生五次不同的恐怖袭击前后,相关少数群体(穆斯林)对其他少数群体(非穆斯林)的感知种族歧视。我们发现,圣战袭击增加了穆斯林内部对种族的歧视,同时减少了非穆斯林内部的歧视,而包括社会地位和经济不安全在内的个体因素比群体因素在更大程度上减轻了公众舆论的反应。因此,虽然群体内部对群体外部的态度往往是无差别的,但群体外部在圣战袭击后的经历取决于受访者的具体身份。