Brain Dynamics Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bipolar Disord. 2021 May;23(3):284-294. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13042. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
Up to 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are initially diagnosed as having major depressive disorder (MDD), and emotional lability is a key aspect of both sets of mood disorders. However, it remains unknown whether differences in the regulation of emotions through cognitive reappraisal may serve to distinguish BD and MDD. Therefore, we examined this question in euthymic BD and MDD patients.
Thirty-eight euthymic BD, 33 euthymic MDD and 37 healthy control (HC) participants, matched for age, gender and depression severity, engaged in an emotion regulation (ER) cognitive reappraisal task during an fMRI scan were examined. Participants either reappraised (Think condition) or passively watched negative (Watch condition) or neutral (Neutral condition) pictures and rated their affect. Activation and connectivity analyses were used to examine group differences in reappraisal (Think vs Watch) and reactivity (Watch vs Neutral) conditions in ER-specific neural circuits.
Irrespective of group, participants rated most negatively the images during the Watch condition relative to Think and Neutral conditions, and more negatively to Think relative to Neutral. Notably, BD participants exhibited reduced subgenual anterior cingulate activation (sgACC) relative to MDD during reappraisal, but exhibited greater sgACC activation relative to MDD during reactivity, whereas MDD participants elicited greater activation in right amygdala relative to BD during reactivity. We found no group differences in task-related connectivity.
Euthymic BD and MDD patients engage differential brain regions to process and regulate emotional information. These differences could serve to distinguish the clinical groups and provide novel insights into the underlying pathophysiology of BD.
高达 40%的双相情感障碍(BD)患者最初被诊断为患有重度抑郁症(MDD),而情绪不稳定是这两种心境障碍的一个关键方面。然而,目前尚不清楚通过认知重评来调节情绪的差异是否可以区分 BD 和 MDD。因此,我们在心境稳定的 BD 和 MDD 患者中研究了这个问题。
我们检查了 38 名心境稳定的 BD、33 名心境稳定的 MDD 和 37 名健康对照(HC)参与者,这些参与者在 fMRI 扫描期间进行了情绪调节(ER)认知重评任务,按年龄、性别和抑郁严重程度进行匹配。参与者要么进行重评(思考条件),要么被动观看负面(观看条件)或中性(中性条件)图片,并对他们的情绪进行评分。激活和连接分析用于检查 ER 特定神经回路中重评(思考与观看)和反应性(观看与中性)条件下的组间差异。
无论组别如何,参与者在观看条件下对图片的评价最为负面,相对于思考和中性条件,而对思考条件的评价则比中性条件更为负面。值得注意的是,BD 患者在重评期间的扣带回前部亚区(sgACC)激活相对 MDD 降低,但在反应性期间的 sgACC 激活相对 MDD 增加,而 MDD 患者在反应性期间的右侧杏仁核激活相对 BD 增加。我们没有发现组间与任务相关的连接差异。
心境稳定的 BD 和 MDD 患者在处理和调节情绪信息时涉及不同的大脑区域。这些差异可以区分临床群体,并为 BD 的潜在病理生理学提供新的见解。