Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy), and Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243806. eCollection 2020.
Coping strategies and their efficacy vary greatly in patients suffering from fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
We aimed to identify somatic and psychosocial factors that might contribute to different coping strategies and resilience levels in FMS.
Standardized questionnaires were used to assess coping, pain, and psychological variables in a cohort of 156 FMS patients. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) determined gene expression of selected cytokines in white blood cells of 136 FMS patients and 25 healthy controls. Data of skin innervation, functional and structural sensory profiles of peripheral nociceptive nerve fibers of a previous study were included into the statistics. An exploratory factor analysis was used to define variance explaining factors, which were then included into cluster analysis.
54.9% of the variance was explained by four factors which we termed (1) affective load, (2) coping, (3) pain, and (4) pro-inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.05). Considering differences in the emerged factors, coping strategies, cytokine profiles, and disability levels, 118 FMS patients could be categorized into four clusters which we named "maladaptive", "adaptive", "vulnerable", and "resilient" (p < 0.05). The adaptive cluster had low scores in disability and in all symptom categories in contrast to the vulnerable cluster, which was characterized by high scores in catastrophizing and disability (p < 0.05). The resilient vs. the maladaptive cluster was characterized by better coping and a less pro-inflammatory cytokine pattern (p < 0.05).
Our data suggest that problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies and an anti-inflammatory cytokine pattern are associated with reduced disability and might promote resilience. Additional personal factors such as low anxiety scores, ability of acceptance, and persistence further favor a resilient phenotype. Individualized therapy should take these factors into account.
患有纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的患者的应对策略及其疗效差异很大。
我们旨在确定躯体和心理社会因素,这些因素可能导致 FMS 患者的不同应对策略和适应水平。
使用标准化问卷评估了 156 名 FMS 患者的应对、疼痛和心理变量。在 136 名 FMS 患者和 25 名健康对照者的白细胞中,采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)测定选定细胞因子的基因表达。将先前研究中皮肤神经支配、外周伤害性神经纤维的功能和结构感觉特征的数据纳入统计分析。采用探索性因子分析确定解释方差的因素,然后将这些因素纳入聚类分析。
四个因素解释了 54.9%的方差,我们将其命名为(1)情感负荷、(2)应对、(3)疼痛和(4)促炎细胞因子(p < 0.05)。考虑到出现的因素、应对策略、细胞因子谱和残疾程度的差异,118 名 FMS 患者可分为四个亚群,我们将其命名为“适应不良”、“适应”、“脆弱”和“有弹性”(p < 0.05)。与脆弱亚群相比,适应亚群的残疾和所有症状类别评分较低,而脆弱亚群的特点是灾难化和残疾评分较高(p < 0.05)。与适应不良亚群相比,有弹性亚群的应对能力更好,促炎细胞因子模式较弱(p < 0.05)。
我们的数据表明,问题焦点和情绪焦点的应对策略以及抗炎细胞因子模式与降低残疾有关,并可能促进适应能力。个人因素如低焦虑评分、接受能力和坚持性等也有利于适应能力强的表型。个体化治疗应考虑这些因素。