Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249562.
The impact on health care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is continuously rising. To investigate the perception of hemato-oncologists concerning the recommended MDS patient care in Switzerland, we conducted a web-based survey on diagnosis, risk-stratification and treatment. 43/309 physicians (13.9%) replied to 135 questions that were based on current guidelines between 3/2017 and 2/2018. Only questions with feedback-rates >50% were further analysed and ratios >90% defined "high agreement", 70-90% "agreement", 30-70% "insufficient agreement" and <30% "disagreement". For diagnosis, we found insufficient agreement on using flow-cytometry, classifying MDS precursor conditions, performing treatment response assessment after hypomethylating agents (HMA) and evaluating patients with suspected germ-line predisposition. For risk-stratification, we identified agreement on using IPSS-R but insufficient agreement for IPSS and patient-based assessments. For treatment, we observed disagreement on performing primary infectious prophylaxis in neutropenia but agreement on using only darbepoetin alfa in anaemic, lower-risk MDS patients. For thrombopoietin receptor agonists, insufficient agreement was found for the indication, preferred agent and triggering platelet count. Insufficient agreement was also found for immunosuppressive treatment in hypoplastic MDS and HMA dose adjustments. In conclusion, we identified areas for improvement in MDS patient care, in need of further clinical trials, information, and guiding documents.
骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者对医疗保健的影响持续上升。为了调查血液科肿瘤学家对瑞士推荐的 MDS 患者护理的认知,我们在诊断、风险分层和治疗方面进行了一项基于网络的调查。在 2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 2 月期间,有 309 名医生中的 43 名(13.9%)回答了 135 个基于当前指南的问题。只有反馈率>50%的问题才会进一步分析,比例>90%定义为“高度一致”,70-90%定义为“一致”,30-70%定义为“不一致”,<30%定义为“不一致”。在诊断方面,我们发现使用流式细胞术、分类 MDS 前体疾病、在低甲基化剂(HMA)治疗后进行治疗反应评估以及评估疑似胚系易感性的患者方面存在不一致。在风险分层方面,我们发现对使用 IPSS-R 存在一致性,但对使用 IPSS 和基于患者的评估存在不一致。在治疗方面,我们观察到在中性粒细胞减少症中进行原发性感染预防存在不一致,但在贫血、低危 MDS 患者中仅使用达贝泊汀α存在一致性。对于血小板生成素受体激动剂,在适应证、首选药物和触发血小板计数方面存在不一致。在低增生 MDS 中的免疫抑制治疗和 HMA 剂量调整方面也存在不一致。总之,我们发现 MDS 患者护理需要进一步临床试验、信息和指导文件来改进。