University of Barcelona, Spain.
KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Belgium.
Behav Modif. 2022 May;46(3):581-627. doi: 10.1177/0145445520982969. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
The current text deals with the assessment of consistency of data features from experimentally similar phases and consistency of effects in single-case experimental designs. Although consistency is frequently mentioned as a critical feature, few quantifications have been proposed so far: namely, under the acronyms CONDAP (consistency of data patterns in similar phases) and CONEFF (consistency of effects). Whereas CONDAP allows assessing the consistency of data patterns, the proposals made here focus on the consistency of data features such as level, trend, and variability, as represented by summary measures (mean, ordinary least squares slope, and standard deviation, respectively). The assessment of consistency of effect is also made in terms of these three data features, while also including the study of the consistency of an immediate effect (if expected). The summary measures are represented as points on a modified Brinley plot and their similarity is assessed via quantifications of distance. Both absolute and relative measures of consistency are proposed: the former expressed in the same measurement units as the outcome variable and the latter as a percentage. Illustrations with real data sets (multiple baseline, ABAB, and alternating treatments designs) show the wide applicability of the proposals. We developed a user-friendly website to offer both the graphical representations and the quantifications.
本文讨论了从实验相似阶段评估数据特征的一致性和单病例实验设计中效应的一致性。尽管一致性经常被提及为一个关键特征,但到目前为止,还没有提出多少量化方法:即缩写 CONDAP(相似阶段数据模式的一致性)和 CONEFF(效应的一致性)。虽然 CONDAP 允许评估数据模式的一致性,但这里的建议侧重于数据特征的一致性,例如水平、趋势和变异性,分别由汇总指标(平均值、普通最小二乘斜率和标准差)表示。效应的一致性评估也以这三个数据特征为基础,同时还包括对即时效应(如果预期的话)一致性的研究。汇总指标表示为修改后的 Brinley 图上的点,并且通过距离的量化来评估它们的相似性。本文提出了绝对和相对一致性的度量方法:前者用与结果变量相同的度量单位表示,后者用百分比表示。使用真实数据集(多个基线、ABAB 和交替处理设计)的说明展示了这些建议的广泛适用性。我们开发了一个用户友好的网站,提供图形表示和量化方法。