• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较使用仿制药和品牌药他汀类药物患者的依从性、持久性和临床结局:使用日本索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of adherence, persistence, and clinical outcome of generic and brand-name statin users: A retrospective cohort study using the Japanese claims database.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2021 May;77(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.003
PMID:33371973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to statin treatment results in an increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. This study compared adherence, persistence, and clinical outcomes of patients who initiated brand-name and generic statins in the Japanese population.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included adult patients who initiated statins between 2014 and 2016. Primary adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) within 1 year. Persistence was assessed using the proportion of non-persistent users. Any major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) was assessed as a clinical outcome. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Among 47,770 patients who met inclusion criteria in the study, 32,130 (67.3%) initiated generic statins. The median age of the patients was 53 (interquartile range: 46-59) years and 60.2% were male. A higher proportion of patients with PDC ≥80% [60.2% vs. 57.1%; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.19; p<0.001] and a higher PDC value (median, 90.2% vs. 87.9%; difference, 2.3%; p<0.001) were observed in the generic group. Similarly, fewer patients discontinued statins in the generic group [24.2% vs. 27.7%; hazard ratio (HR), 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.95; p<0.001]. Differences in MACCE occurrence were not significant between the groups (4.3% vs. 4.2%; HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93-1.17; p=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence and persistence were higher among generic statin recipients; nevertheless, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were noted between the two groups, suggesting that generic medication did not impair treatment benefits and may improve patient adherence.

摘要

背景

他汀类药物治疗不依从会增加心血管事件和全因死亡率的风险。本研究比较了日本人群中使用品牌名和仿制药他汀类药物的患者的依从性、持久性和临床结局。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2014 年至 2016 年期间开始使用他汀类药物的成年患者。主要依从性通过在 1 年内的用药天数比例(PDC)来衡量。持久性通过非持续使用者的比例来评估。任何主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE)都被评估为临床结局。采用倾向评分匹配来调整混杂因素。

结果

在符合研究纳入标准的 47770 名患者中,32130 名(67.3%)患者开始使用仿制药他汀类药物。患者的中位年龄为 53 岁(四分位距:46-59 岁),60.2%为男性。PDC≥80%的患者比例更高[60.2% vs. 57.1%;比值比,1.14;95%置信区间(CI),1.09-1.19;p<0.001],PDC 值更高(中位数,90.2% vs. 87.9%;差值,2.3%;p<0.001)。同样,仿制药组中停药的患者更少[24.2% vs. 27.7%;风险比(HR),0.91;95%CI,0.87-0.95;p<0.001]。两组间 MACCE 发生率无显著差异(4.3% vs. 4.2%;HR,1.04;95%CI,0.93-1.17;p=0.99)。

结论

仿制药他汀类药物使用者的依从性和持久性更高;然而,两组间的临床结局无显著差异,表明仿制药并未损害治疗效果,反而可能提高了患者的依从性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of adherence, persistence, and clinical outcome of generic and brand-name statin users: A retrospective cohort study using the Japanese claims database.比较使用仿制药和品牌药他汀类药物患者的依从性、持久性和临床结局:使用日本索赔数据库的回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiol. 2021 May;77(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
2
Treatment persistence and adherence and their consequences on patient outcomes of generic versus brand-name statins routinely used to treat high cholesterol levels in Spain: a retrospective cost-consequences analysis.在西班牙,常规使用通用名和品牌名他汀类药物治疗高胆固醇水平,本回顾性成本后果分析评估了这些药物在治疗持续性和患者依从性及其对患者结局的影响。
Lipids Health Dis. 2018 Dec 6;17(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0918-y.
3
Comparative effectiveness of generic and brand-name statins on patient outcomes: a cohort study.比较通用名他汀类药物和品牌名他汀类药物对患者结局的疗效:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 16;161(6):400-7. doi: 10.7326/M13-2942.
4
Patient adherence to generic versus brand statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the Can Rapid Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines Registry.急性心肌梗死后患者对通用名与品牌他汀类药物治疗的依从性:来自“能否通过早期实施美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南快速对不稳定型心绞痛患者进行分层以抑制不良结局”注册研究的见解
Am Heart J. 2015 Jul;170(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
5
The impact of manufacturer coupon use in the statin market.制造商优惠券在他汀类药物市场中的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(9):765-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.9.765.
6
Adherence to changing from brand-name to generic atorvastatin in newly treated patients: a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims.新治疗患者中从品牌阿托伐他汀转换为通用阿托伐他汀的依从性:一项使用医疗保险理赔数据的回顾性队列研究
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2015 Apr 1;1:12. doi: 10.1186/s40780-015-0013-8. eCollection 2015.
7
Switching, Persistence and Adherence to Statin Therapy: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Australian National Pharmacy Data.他汀类药物治疗的转换、持续性和依从性:一项使用澳大利亚国家药房数据的回顾性队列研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Oct;36(5):867-877. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07199-7. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
Adherence to statins and its impact on clinical outcomes: a retrospective population-based study in China.他汀类药物的依从性及其对临床结局的影响:中国一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01566-2.
9
Statin persistence and adherence among older initiators: A nationwide cohort study using the national health insurance claims database in Japan.老年他汀类药物起始使用者的持续性和依从性:一项使用日本国民健康保险索赔数据库的全国性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Aug;32(8):873-885. doi: 10.1002/pds.5622. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
10
Adherence to statin treatment and health outcomes in an Italian cohort of newly treated patients: results from an administrative database analysis.在一个意大利新治疗患者队列中,他汀类药物治疗的依从性与健康结果:来自行政数据库分析的结果。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jan;34(1):190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.12.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of treatment patterns, efficacy and safety between generic and branded atorvastatin users in China: a multicenter, retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.中国仿制药与原研阿托伐他汀使用者的治疗模式、疗效及安全性比较:一项多中心、回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究
Lipids Health Dis. 2025 Jul 22;24(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12944-025-02673-9.
2
Can Generic Medications Be a Safe and Effective Alternative to Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.通用型药物能否成为治疗心血管疾病的安全有效替代品牌药?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 7;26(3):26116. doi: 10.31083/RCM26116. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Testing the unintended cost effects of health policies for generic substitutions: the case of China's National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) policy.
测试仿制药替代健康政策的意外成本影响:以中国国家集中带量采购(NVBP)政策为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):194-205. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae101.
4
Factors Influencing Drug Prescribing for Patients With Hospitalization History in Circulatory Disease-Patient Severity, Composite Adherence, and Physician-Patient Relationship: Retrospective Cohort Study.影响有循环系统疾病住院史患者用药处方的因素——患者严重程度、综合依从性及医患关系:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 6;7:e59234. doi: 10.2196/59234.
5
Impact and implications of national centralized drug procurement in China.中国国家集中药品采购的影响与启示
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1557-1562. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01767-1. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
Statins use amidst the pandemic: prescribing, dispensing, adherence, persistence, and correlation with COVID-19 statistics in nationwide real-world data from Poland.疫情期间他汀类药物的使用情况:波兰全国真实世界数据中的处方开具、配药、依从性、持续性以及与新冠肺炎统计数据的相关性
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 9;15:1350717. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1350717. eCollection 2024.
7
Generic substitution of amlodipine is not associated with increased risk of mortality or adverse cardiovascular events: An observational cohort study.氨氯地平的通用替代与死亡率或不良心血管事件的增加无关:一项观察性队列研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13779. doi: 10.1111/cts.13779.
8
Factors influencing drug switching and changes in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels with atorvastatin: a real-world observational study.阿托伐他汀药物转换及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平变化的影响因素:一项真实世界观察性研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2023 Sep 13;22(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01903-2.
9
Clinical epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology studies with real-world databases.临床流行病学和基于真实世界数据库的药物流行病学研究。
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2022;98(10):517-528. doi: 10.2183/pjab.98.026.
10
The Potential to Reduce Patient Co-Payment and the Public Payer Spending in Poland through an Optimised Implementation of the Generic Substitution: The Win-Win Scenario Suggested by the Real-World Big Data Analysis.通过优化仿制药替代实施来降低波兰患者自付费用和公共支付方支出的潜力:真实世界大数据分析提出的双赢方案
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 28;13(8):1165. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081165.