Suppr超能文献

台式温度计在新生儿中的比较。

Bench-top comparison of thermometers used in newborn infants.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Jul;106(4):435-437. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320123. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

Abstract

We wished to determine the accuracy of thermometers used to measure temperature in newborn infants. We measured the temperature of a water bath with three types of thermometer set at 0.5°C increments between 32.5°C and 38.5°C and compared the values to a control. We recorded the time to display steady-state temperature. The Microlife thermometer most closely approximated control temperature (mean difference <0.1°C (SD<0.1°C)) and displayed a reading in a mean time of 29 s (SD 2 s). Used in 'predictive' (default) mode, the Welch Allyn SureTemp Plus 692 thermometer differed from the control by a mean of 0.6°C (SD 0.3°C), displaying a temperature at 15 s (SD 3 s). This device consistently overestimated temperature. In 'continuous' mode, the mean difference was <0.1°C (SD<0.1°C) at 5 min. The Phillips probe differed from the control by a mean of 0.4°C (SD 0.2°C). Thermometers used to measure temperature in newborn infants may underestimate hypothermia. A prospective study in newborn infants is needed.

摘要

我们旨在确定用于测量新生儿体温的温度计的准确性。我们测量了三种类型的温度计在 32.5°C 至 38.5°C 之间以 0.5°C 为增量设置的水浴温度,并将测量值与对照值进行比较。我们记录了达到稳定温度的时间。Microlife 温度计最接近对照温度(平均差值<0.1°C(SD<0.1°C)),平均显示读数时间为 29 秒(SD 2 秒)。在“预测”(默认)模式下,Welch Allyn SureTemp Plus 692 温度计与对照值相差 0.6°C(SD 0.3°C),平均 15 秒(SD 3 秒)显示温度。该设备始终高估温度。在“连续”模式下,5 分钟时平均差值<0.1°C(SD<0.1°C)。Phillips 探头与对照值相差 0.4°C(SD 0.2°C)。用于测量新生儿体温的温度计可能会低估低体温。需要对新生儿进行前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验