• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BET 1:最佳证据主题报告:钩试验是否足够敏感,可用于排除肱二头肌长头腱远端撕裂?

BET 1: Best Evidence Topic Report: is the hook test sensitive enough to be used to exclude distal biceps tendon rupture?

机构信息

South Tees Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Jan;38(1):78-79. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211011.2.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-211011.2
PMID:33372045
Abstract

A shortcut review was carried out to see whether the hook test is sensitive enough for a negative result to exclude complete distal biceps tendon rupture (DBTR) in adults. 3 papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. It is concluded that the hook test is moderately sensitive at detecting complete DBTR when carried out by skilled clinicians in specialist upper limb clinics. As a single test, it is not sensitive enough to be used to exclude complete DBTR.

摘要

进行了快捷回顾,以观察钩试验的结果是否足够灵敏,从而可以在成人中排除完全肱二头肌肌腱断裂(DBTR)。3 篇论文提供了最佳证据来回答临床问题。作者、出版日期和国家/地区、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局、这些论文的结果和研究局限性均列于表中。结论是,在专业上肢诊所中由熟练的临床医生进行钩试验时,其检测完全 DBTR 的敏感性中等。作为单一检测方法,其不够灵敏,无法用于排除完全 DBTR。

相似文献

1
BET 1: Best Evidence Topic Report: is the hook test sensitive enough to be used to exclude distal biceps tendon rupture?BET 1:最佳证据主题报告:钩试验是否足够敏感,可用于排除肱二头肌长头腱远端撕裂?
Emerg Med J. 2021 Jan;38(1):78-79. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211011.2.
2
Improving the rapid and reliable diagnosis of complete distal biceps tendon rupture: a nuanced approach to the clinical examination.提高完全性肱二头肌肌腱断裂的快速、可靠诊断:临床检查的细致入微方法。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):1998-2004. doi: 10.1177/0363546513493383. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
The "bicipital aponeurosis flex test": evaluating the integrity of the bicipital aponeurosis and its implications for treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures.肱二头肌腱膜屈肌试验:评估肱二头肌腱膜的完整性及其对治疗远端肱二头肌腱断裂的意义。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):908-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 May 7.
4
Bye Bye Biceps: Case Report Describing Presentation, Physical Examination, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment of Acute Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture.再见了,肱二头肌:描述急性肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂的临床表现、体格检查、诊断检查及治疗的病例报告
J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):702-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
5
The hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion.肱二头肌远端肌腱撕脱的钩试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1865-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546507305016. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
6
The biceps squeeze test for diagnosis of distal biceps tendon ruptures.用于诊断肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂的肱二头肌挤压试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug(437):128-31. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000167668.18444.f5.
7
Complete rupture of the distal biceps tendon in a woman: case report.一名女性肱二头肌远端肌腱完全断裂:病例报告。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 May-Jun;31(5):798-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.02.007.
8
The biceps crease interval for diagnosing complete distal biceps tendon ruptures.用于诊断肱二头肌远端肌腱完全断裂的肱二头肌褶皱间距。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0334-0. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
9
[Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps--diagnosis and results].[肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂——诊断与结果]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992 Jan-Feb;130(1):31-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039509.
10
Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting partial and complete distal biceps tendon rupture.磁共振成像在检测肱二头肌远端部分和完全断裂中的有效性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 May;35(5):865; author reply 865-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Distal biceps tendon injuries treatment: A survey of orthopaedic surgeons' current practice and preferences.肱二头肌远端肌腱损伤的治疗:骨科医生当前的实践与偏好调查。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Oct;16(6):646-653. doi: 10.1177/17585732231215504. Epub 2023 Nov 17.