• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右心室起搏后心力衰竭患者升级为左束支起搏的疗效。

Efficacy of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with heart failure after right ventricular pacing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

College of Computing, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):472-480. doi: 10.1111/pace.14147. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1111/pace.14147
PMID:33372293
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with an increased incidence of heart failure and mortality. Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing could produce near-physiological electrical activation and mechanical synchrony. We aimed to report the effects of upgrading to LBB pacing in heart failure patients after chronic RV pacing.

METHODS

The indications included pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in Group 1 and heart failure after RV pacing with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% in Group 2. LBB pacing was achieved by penetrating the pacing lead to the subendocardium of left-sided interventricular septum through the venous access. Left ventricular activation time (LVAT) was measured from the pacing stimulus to the ascending peak of lead V5 or V6. All patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluations before and after upgrading.

RESULTS

Totally 27 patients (13 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2) were consecutively enrolled. The mean follow-up time after upgrade was 10.4 ± 6.1 months. Paced QRS duration was significantly shortened from 174.1 ± 15.8 milliseconds to 116.6 ± 11.7 milliseconds (p < .0001). The mean LVAT was 83.2 ± 11.7 milliseconds. LVEF increased from 40.3 ± 5.2% before upgrading to 48.1 ± 9.5% at follow-up in patients with PICM. Serum N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels decreased and New York Heart Association classification improved in both groups. No upgrade-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrading to LBB pacing was feasible and effective with improved cardiac function in heart failure patients with both reduced and preserved LVEF after RV pacing.

摘要

背景

慢性右心室(RV)起搏与心力衰竭和死亡率的发生率增加有关。左束支(LBB)起搏可以产生接近生理的电激活和机械同步性。我们旨在报告在慢性 RV 起搏后心力衰竭患者中升级为 LBB 起搏的效果。

方法

适应证包括 1 组中的起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)和 2 组中的 RV 起搏后心力衰竭伴左心室射血分数(LVEF)≥50%。通过经静脉通路将起搏导线穿透到左室间隔的心内膜下,实现 LBB 起搏。从起搏刺激到导联 V5 或 V6 的上升峰测量左心室激活时间(LVAT)。所有患者在升级前后均进行临床和超声心动图评估。

结果

共有 27 例患者(1 组 13 例,2 组 14 例)连续入选。升级后平均随访时间为 10.4±6.1 个月。起搏 QRS 时限明显缩短,从 174.1±15.8 毫秒缩短至 116.6±11.7 毫秒(p<0.0001)。平均 LVAT 为 83.2±11.7 毫秒。PICM 患者的 LVEF 从升级前的 40.3±5.2%增加到随访时的 48.1±9.5%。两组血清 N 末端脑利钠肽前体水平降低,纽约心脏协会分级改善。未观察到与升级相关的并发症。

结论

在慢性 RV 起搏后 LVEF 降低和保留的心力衰竭患者中,升级为 LBB 起搏是可行且有效的,可以改善心功能。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with heart failure after right ventricular pacing.右心室起搏后心力衰竭患者升级为左束支起搏的疗效。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):472-480. doi: 10.1111/pace.14147. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
Beneficial effects of upgrading to His bundle pacing in chronically paced patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50.升级为希氏束起搏对左心室射血分数<50%的慢性起搏患者的有益影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Mar;15(3):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Electrophysiological Insights into Three Modalities of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients Indicated for Pacing Therapy.三种左束支区域起搏模式的电生理见解在需要起搏治疗的患者中。
Int Heart J. 2021 Jan 30;62(1):78-86. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-490. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
4
Longer Paced QRS Duration is Associated With Increased Prevalence of Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy.更长的起搏QRS波时限与右心室起搏诱导性心肌病患病率增加相关。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1174-1179. doi: 10.1111/jce.13045. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
5
The specific value of upgrading to left bundle branch area pacing in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or non-pacing-induced cardiomyopathy related upgrade status: A retrospective study.升级为左束支区域起搏在起搏诱导性心肌病或非起搏诱导性心肌病相关升级状态患者中的具体价值:一项回顾性研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):761-770. doi: 10.1111/pace.14723. Epub 2023 May 29.
6
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
7
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
His-Purkinje conduction system pacing for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.希氏-浦肯野系统起搏治疗起搏诱导性心肌病的系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;66(4):1005-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01296-9. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum.经室间隔行永久性左束支起搏的可行性和心脏同步性。
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1694-1702. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz188.
10
Lead performance and clinical outcomes of patients with permanent His-Purkinje system pacing: a single-centre experience.永久性希氏-浦肯野系统起搏患者的临床疗效和表现:单中心经验。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii45-ii53. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa295.

引用本文的文献

1
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏指征的临床共识声明,欧洲心律协会对ESC有特别贡献,并得到亚太心律协会、加拿大心律协会、心律协会和拉丁美洲心律协会的认可。
Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf050.
2
Conduction system pacing upgrade biventricular pacing on pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy: a retrospective observational study.传导系统起搏升级为双心室起搏治疗起搏器介导的心肌病:一项回顾性观察研究。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 23;15:1355696. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1355696. eCollection 2024.
3
New Insights into Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy.起搏诱导性心肌病的新见解
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 27;25(4):118. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504118. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Clinical value of the fibrosis-4 index in predicting mortality in patients with right ventricular pacing.纤维化-4指数在预测右心室起搏患者死亡率中的临床价值。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0294221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294221. eCollection 2024.
5
Beneficial effects of upgrading to His-Purkinje system pacing in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.升级为希氏-浦肯野系统起搏对起搏诱导性心肌病患者的有益影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 11;11:e16268. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16268. eCollection 2023.
6
Left bundle branch area pacing in mildly reduced heart failure: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.左束支区域起搏治疗轻度心力衰竭:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):713-720. doi: 10.1002/clc.24028. Epub 2023 May 5.
7
Recruitment of the cardiac conduction system for optimal resynchronization therapy in failing heart.在心力衰竭中招募心脏传导系统以实现最佳再同步治疗。
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1045740. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1045740. eCollection 2022.
8
Left bundle branch area pacing: A promising modality for cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支区域起搏:心脏再同步治疗的一种有前景的方式。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 18;9:901046. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.901046. eCollection 2022.
9
Speckle tracking imaging evaluation of left ventricular myocardial work comparing right ventricular septal pacing with His-Purkinje system area pacing.对比右心室间隔起搏与希氏-浦肯野系统区域起搏的左心室心肌做功的斑点追踪成像评估
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;9:949841. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.949841. eCollection 2022.
10
Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.升级右心室起搏器为双心室起搏或传导系统起搏:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac188.