Suppr超能文献

对采用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案进行体外受精治疗的患者使用两种重组人促卵泡素α注射液情况的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of the use of two recombinant follitropin alfa injections in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

作者信息

Šprem Goldštajn Marina, Dumančić Stipe, Mikuš Mislav

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Mar;47(3):992-1001. doi: 10.1111/jog.14626. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of biosimilar (Ovaleap) compared with the referenced follitropin alfa (Gonal-f), within the context of antagonistic multiple doses protocol of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective, monocentric study included 229 infertile women aged 22 to 43 years who underwent their first cycle of COH for the purpose of the IVF or ICSI during the period of 2017. Eligible patients underwent ovarian stimulation with either Ovaleap (n = 152) or Gonal-f (n = 77) starting at Cycle Day 2 and were receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in either fixed or flexible antagonist protocol manner.

RESULTS

Ovaleap-treatment resulted in fewer number of oocytes retrieved in regard to Gonal-f-treatment, with the median of seven oocytes retrieved in the Ovaleap group versus nine in the Gonal-f group (U = 5369.5, P = 0.3079). Clinical pregnancy rate was 24.3% in the overall study sample and 31.9% in women with embryo transfer, in the Ovaleap group. Similarly, in the Gonal-f group these rates were 25.0% and 34.5%, respectively. Only four patients experienced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, with one case in Ovaleap-treatment group and three cases in Gonal-f-treatment group.

CONCLUSION

While the clinical efficacy profile favored using Gonal-f formulation of follitropin alfa, this analysis showed that there is no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved between Ovaleap and Gonal-f follitropin alfa formulations, used within GnRH antagonist protocols of COH.

摘要

目的

在用于体外受精(IVF)或卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)技术的控制性卵巢刺激(COH)的拮抗剂多剂量方案背景下,评估生物类似物(Ovaleap)与参比促卵泡素α(果纳芬)相比的临床疗效。

方法

一项回顾性单中心研究纳入了229名年龄在22至43岁之间的不孕女性,她们在2017年期间接受了首个用于IVF或ICSI目的的COH周期治疗。符合条件的患者从周期第2天开始使用Ovaleap(n = 152)或果纳芬(n = 77)进行卵巢刺激,并以固定或灵活拮抗剂方案的方式接受促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂治疗。

结果

与果纳芬治疗相比,Ovaleap治疗获取的卵母细胞数量更少,Ovaleap组获取的卵母细胞中位数为7个,而果纳芬组为9个(U = 5369.5,P = 0.3079)。在整个研究样本中,临床妊娠率为24.3%,在Ovaleap组接受胚胎移植的女性中为31.9%。同样,在果纳芬组中,这些比率分别为25.0%和34.5%。只有4名患者发生卵巢过度刺激综合征,Ovaleap治疗组1例,果纳芬治疗组3例。

结论

虽然临床疗效方面更倾向于使用促卵泡素α的果纳芬制剂,但该分析表明,在COH的GnRH拮抗剂方案中使用时,Ovaleap和促卵泡素α的果纳芬制剂在获取的卵母细胞数量上没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验